Zero132132 wrote...
There's one counterexample, and part of me thinks that the way that many (especially me) reacted to it is what brought about their current stance.CmnDwnWrkn wrote...
If there's an issue that can't be fixed in a balance change, this is their standard way of dealing with the issue - they simply don't respond to it. At times, they'll say something like, "We're planning on looking into it," and then you'll never hear from them again. But if there isn't a easy solution, and there isn't a patch on the horizon, they will never respond to the issue.
In other words, you'll never see the following: "We're aware of this problem, and unfortunately there is nothing we can do about it at this time."
Which I understand is very frustrating, annoying, anger-inducing, etc. But let's be honest, this is not the only bug in the game, nor is it the most critical. They might respond to it, they might not. But that's the way it is, and is not all inconsistent with their past behavior.
Someone asked a thread that devs were active in why they hadn't done anything about Geth hunters and rocket troopers firing when they shouldn't be able to (staggered, stasised, pulled, otherwise ragdolled). Eric Fagnan basically said that it wasn't a priority, and everyone got pretty pissed, including me. I was even the ass hole that started a thread specifically pointing at the other stupid fixes that they HAD bothered to work on that clearly should have been less important. Even then, I really wish he'd just given a vague claim that they were looking into it like they did with blade armor on the Batarians.
So there have been times where they responded, even though it wasn't something they could fix in a balance change. And it didn't go well. And to a substantial extent, it was my fault.
LOL I would be pissed too if he said that. That type of response might be why they now avoid responding when they don't have a specific fix identified or impending plans to fix a problem. I get the impression they think that not responding at all is better than admitting a fault but saying they either can't or won't fix it.
Do you have a link to the thread you're talking about? I'd like to see that discussion. Sounds interesting, I didn't realize Fagnana replied regarding that issue.





Retour en haut





