693 réponses à ce sujet

[himegoto]

Good morning

[Hiero Glyph]

Bueller?  er ... Fagnan?  ...Fagnan?  ...Fagnan?

[tonnactus]

bump.

[BjornDaDwarf]

himegoto wrote...

Good morning

late afternoon

[Hiero Glyph]

BjornDaDwarf wrote...

himegoto wrote...

Good morning

late afternoon

Evening now (at least here).

[Radwar]

Phew, the thread almost made it to the second page. We're safe for now.

[ForTuchanka]

Atheosis wrote...

ForTuchanka wrote...

Before we start lighting the torches and grabbing the pitchforks, lets at least give them a week to try and fix or at least comment on it via the weekly balance update and its thread.

They have read this thread by now, and have conciously chosen not to comment.  To think otherwise is profoundly naive.

You have read my post and have chosen not to notice the explicit mention of the weekly balance thread.  To think that I was talking about Bioware commenting here instead indicates profound illiteracy on your part.

[Hirosama_White-PR]

I wonder why there is no comment from bioware...

[Megadawg169]

don't know if has already been stated, but i don't feel like looking though twenty pages, but...... Its Biotic Damage boost. Not Weapon. She has a special Cloak tree.  Sources are info found in data mines, and I belive that a Developer mentioned it as a teaser before she was released.

[darkpassenger2342]

^lol

bumped.

[Grunt_Platform]

I'd just be happy if the Power Damage bonus for taking her cloak to Rank 6 actually made a significant difference. Instead of, you know, being a puny additive bonus.

Though official word on if it's working as intended, or buggy, would be nice.

[tonnactus]

bump

[himegoto]

MastahDisastah wrote...

New trend is "cloak is supposed not to give damage bonus on the huntress".
If it's like this can we have at least some sort of comment on the matter? I don't know, maybe a "yes it's working as intended"...
Thanks...

Would smell too fishy if they give such a response after several days. Poor bioware seems like the best thing to do right now is to keep silent.
Unless they want to surprise us with a huge bugs fix patch.

Still, bump for justice.

[TODD 5184]

Morning bump

[Zero132132]

'nother bump.

[Upfunkt]

himegoto wrote...

MastahDisastah wrote...

New trend is "cloak is supposed not to give damage bonus on the huntress".
If it's like this can we have at least some sort of comment on the matter? I don't know, maybe a "yes it's working as intended"...
Thanks...

Would smell too fishy if they give such a response after several days. Poor bioware seems like the best thing to do right now is to keep silent.
Unless they want to surprise us with a huge bugs fix patch.

Still, bump for justice.

It costs something like $40,000 to release a patch for xbox live/psn. If there will ever be another patch, it will probably accompany the next multiplayer dlc.... if there is a next multiplayer dlc.

[himegoto]

Upfunkt wrote...

himegoto wrote...

MastahDisastah wrote...

New trend is "cloak is supposed not to give damage bonus on the huntress".
If it's like this can we have at least some sort of comment on the matter? I don't know, maybe a "yes it's working as intended"...
Thanks...

Would smell too fishy if they give such a response after several days. Poor bioware seems like the best thing to do right now is to keep silent.
Unless they want to surprise us with a huge bugs fix patch.

Still, bump for justice.

It costs something like $40,000 to release a patch for xbox live/psn. If there will ever be another patch, it will probably accompany the next multiplayer dlc.... if there is a next multiplayer dlc.

Which is why their response (or lack of) on this matter is completely understandable to me.
What's incomprehensible is the amount of people who think this is an "intended" release. Of course, that's just my opinion.

[TODD 5184]

Page 5. Keep bumping. This is my dinner bump.

[TODD 5184]

Dinner bump. #2?

[Stardusk]

MastahDisastah wrote...

himegoto wrote...
Which is why their response (or lack of) on this matter is completely understandable to me.
What's incomprehensible is the amount of people who think this is an "intended" release. Of course, that's just my opinion.

Pretty simple to me.
Warp/Incendiary IV with rail amp III.
Something that clearly everyone has plenty of.

If the TC will be fixed be prepared for an incoming storm of "Huntress is OP, too easy!" threads from the same uber 1337 players that cried for a harder difficulty.
They'll never be pleased.

So a class that can one clip a Platinum Praetorian is not OP? OK...

[Zero132132]

Stuff in this thread seems to be an argument for warp ammo being OP. Just throwing that out there. Anything at all that the Asari Infiltrator can get in weapon damage boosts can also be done by any character with warp. Claiming that she'd be OP with a TC boost just seems odd. Why don't people utilize teams with one biotic with an AoE primer (reave) and Infiltrators with warp ammo?

There's nothing new here. Warp ammo's boosts are clearly ridiculous. It isn't exclusive to this class.

[etm125]

BW could make this go away with a simple 'working as intended' or 'bugged and working on it'