Aller au contenu

Photo

Why is everyone saying the game is bad/has bad graphics? It does not!!!


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
88 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Skullreaver13

Skullreaver13
  • Members
  • 9 messages
I noticed there are so many posts of people whining and crying about how bad the graphics are, or how terrible the game is. To all the people who have not got the game yet, do not let these stupid douche cakes make you re think about buying the game. IT IS AMAZING! The graphics are far from terrible, imo they are great. The gameplay is great the fighting is awesome and intense and you never want to stop playing, ill admit I have played it all day today because its so addictive! I havn't even scraped the surface yet, I havnt met all the characters but still im so immersed already into this beautiful world.

People who say the game is bad are terrible and dont play many games, this game is amazing and you should not listen to noobs who dont know what they are talking about :D

K thanks ^^

#2
AcrylamideTic

AcrylamideTic
  • Members
  • 74 messages
http://yfrog.com/0wb...xture1g...1080p

http://img337.images...gins.jpg...look at suit of armor (this one's not mine)

http://a.imagehost.o...03224227269.jpg (again not mine)

Modifié par AcrylamideTic, 04 novembre 2009 - 07:09 .


#3
hazelam

hazelam
  • Members
  • 42 messages
game looks pretty good to me.

with those pictures, the url for the first one doesn't seem to work, it looks like the textures haven't loaded fully yet.

certainly reminds me of when the same thing happens in mass effect.

and when it's only one object that has the low quality textures that makes me think that might be the case.

#4
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*

Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
  • Guests
I also think the graphics look great. There is much more to graphical quality other than texture resolution.



People who are saying the graphics are bad are doing so because there is basically nothing else they can complain about the game.

#5
Cork85

Cork85
  • Members
  • 99 messages
game looks great, people just like to complain about small details.

#6
Razcalking1978

Razcalking1978
  • Members
  • 160 messages
Game looks very good for me on a mid-range graphics card. No complaints here.

#7
FalloutBoy

FalloutBoy
  • Members
  • 580 messages
Some things look amazing, like the faces, the clothing, and the armor. And since these are the things you look at the most, it makes sense that you want them to look good. There is a good variety of character animation, though I've seen some popping. In cutscenes the head tracking looks very mechanical at times. If you stand on a cliff and look out over the horizon, you can see where the graphics look less impressive, but you can't even walk over there without loading a new area anyway so it really doesn't matter.



Overall the graphics are very good, but not great, except the faces and armor which look outstanding. Anyone who says the graphics are bad is trolling.


#8
Sarevok Anchev

Sarevok Anchev
  • Members
  • 1 404 messages
If they want kickass graphics AND tactical fantasy fights,

they should play p&p and close their eyes...

#9
cback

cback
  • Members
  • 39 messages
Game looks great! I agree the graphics are well done.

#10
NyarghoDirge

NyarghoDirge
  • Members
  • 11 messages
Graphics are fantastic.

#11
icepetro

icepetro
  • Members
  • 7 messages
highest settings 1600x1200 - game runs smooth, graphics look awesome

#12
Tech6425

Tech6425
  • Members
  • 23 messages
agreed, looks fine to me



especially considering the amount of other stuff in the game... sure crysis and MW2 look great, they are FPS's for gods sake... they are shallow games without the content of an RPG. its easy to make a great looking game if you can devote so much more disk space to textures

#13
redman5427

redman5427
  • Members
  • 8 messages
I will say that the female character models are very well done for once. Nothing at all like the ugly women in Oblivion or Nwn2

#14
Dam Wookie

Dam Wookie
  • Members
  • 130 messages
Graphics run at high on my 4 year old laptop. People who have desktop machines from the last year or two will and should be disappointed. People who've built their hopes up for an advance on mass effect graphics especially given the time difference from release will be disappointed. They aren't rubbish but they are a strange mix between NWN quality in parts and "wow that looks sweet" in others.



Just because I think the game is great, doesn't mean I should fanboy about things that aren't true.

#15
IspectreI7

IspectreI7
  • Members
  • 12 messages
The game was in development for 5 years. People, please, wake up. There are games that have been in development for that long, but they keep scrapping the process to update the texture base (Duke Nukem, etc). It is what it is... and I think it certainly looks good considering the undertaking that BioWare had on it's hands with this massive of a game. The Eclipse engine was used for this.. and it's showing it's age. Once all the artwork was finalized and the plot was written (probably 2005ish) they had to settle on a graphics engine. Keep that in mind, everyone.

Bringing up Mass Effect is garbage as that had a completely different development timeline and is on the UT3 engine.

Modifié par IspectreI7, 04 novembre 2009 - 06:17 .


#16
krol146

krol146
  • Members
  • 324 messages
Im only running it on medium, and i still think it looks great.

#17
Ashbery

Ashbery
  • Members
  • 143 messages
The game was never a pretty third person game like MassEffect.You never saw large amounts of enemies in that game for a reason.DA has battles with up to 20 or more enemies on the screen but with that comes a price.

#18
dragero

dragero
  • Members
  • 115 messages
Dissing on something everyone likes makes you cool, amirite?

#19
twigster

twigster
  • Members
  • 20 messages
Honestly, I was a little disappointed in the graphics. They aren't FANTASTIC and they also aren't blah. I acquiesce it my be my graphics card. It's not a top-of-the-line card- 8500 GT.

#20
Guest_elvn2007_*

Guest_elvn2007_*
  • Guests

icepetro wrote...

highest settings 1600x1200 - game runs smooth, graphics look awesome


1440x900 here same settings, looks fantastic.

#21
BoomWav

BoomWav
  • Members
  • 151 messages
1680x1050 2x aa. Fine with me.

#22
childofbhaal

childofbhaal
  • Members
  • 59 messages
I have sunk the past 2 days of my life into this game. That said, the graphics are not great.

It 'shows' that the game has been in development for 5 years. Can't fault them really, they just didn't have the tech back 5 (or 3.5 years ago when I suspect the engine work itself started.).

But look at the difference between Mass Effect and Dragon Age. Mass Effect is a better look game (not even talking about the better looking PC version). Its also 2 year older.



/shrug. It was disappointing, but I got over it quickly. What IS there (textures aside) looks pretty darn decent.

#23
Skyplatoon

Skyplatoon
  • Members
  • 76 messages
This game looks GREAT maxed out on my pc at 1680 x 1050. The low res texture are there....but image when user generated content starts to pour out, that will be fixed. This game will be endless. I love it.

#24
Carukia

Carukia
  • Members
  • 10 messages
I was highly disappointed with the graphics in the third-person over-the-shoulder view. I had been unsure if I wanted to play in that view or in isometric. The game made up my mind for me. I'm having a lot of fun in the isometric view and I think it looks great. I just can't stomach the third-person view. Otherwise, I'm loving the game so far.

#25
LIDEN

LIDEN
  • Members
  • 3 messages
I am playing at max res, maxed everything and the game plays smooth as butter and looks amazing. I think most people that complain are new to PC gaming because I just can't see where they get off saying this game looks bad.