184 réponses à ce sujet

[capn233]

tyhw wrote...

Bursting all the ravager sacs does 30% damage.  This can be increased by a debuff, so cryo blast>bursting sacs will do 37.5% damage, or 3037.5 damage.  So the Ravager now has 5062.5 Armor left.  With Warp Ammo IV, Shotgun Rail III, and Shotgun Amp IV, with the Cryo Blast debuff, a QFE with a Claymore can do 5201.5 damage.

In conclusion, yes this is possible


EDIT: Just realized this was with Incendiary Ammo.  With this, you get 4995.5 damage, or just 67 damage short.  This is well within the realm of possibility.

Yes, I just did it in a game.  I asked because I usually used the Saber or various other weapons on the Quarian before.

But I still don't get the math.  So how much damage does it take to break a sac and is that damage also applied to the Ravager?

Modifié par capn233, 30 novembre 2012 - 02:28 .

[Tybo]

I don't know how much damage it takes to break the Ravager sacs. From playing, I would guess not much. But I don't have a number for it.

Once you do enough damage to the Ravagers sacs, the sac bursts. When the sac bursts, the Ravager takes damage.I don't know how much each sac burst does, but according to corlist, all the sacs do 30% damage combined.

[Ogrinash]

Raider seems more like a "weaker but two shot" Claymore.

Roughly 2/3rds damage per shot, but with two quick shots for that instant effect that you get from Claymore. Wraith has the damage (about 150 or so more than Raider), but it doesn't have that instant, "get the hell away from me" that Claymore [and Raider] has.

[capn233]

tyhw wrote...

Once you do enough damage to the Ravagers sacs, the sac bursts. When the sac bursts, the Ravager takes damage.I don't know how much each sac burst does, but according to corlist, all the sacs do 30% damage combined.

I guess it doesn't matter, it works in the end.  I also didn't think that Cryo worked on the burst, so learned a couple things worthwhile.

Modifié par capn233, 30 novembre 2012 - 03:05 .

[Kronner]

Wraith sounds like a peashooter. No thanks.

[AgentStark]

Its actually a pretty good double barrel shotgun essentially. I'd try it out.

[Locutus_of_BORG]

Kronner wrote...

Wraith sounds like a peashooter. No thanks.

Yes, the Wraith is a peashooter. A shooter of superheated, hypersonic, metallic, hate-filled peas.

[Kenadian]

Feneckus wrote...

How come so many people are obcessed about the time between each power they cast ?

The time between each kill should be more relevant.

I'd rather be able to one shot Ravagers and two shot Brutes than being able to cast a power one second earlier.

This goes back to the Drellguard thread, and the point I made there. Difference of play style. Some people prefer to rely on their character's powers, and it may very well be necessary for what they want to do.

[Kingston Atticus]

Kenadian wrote...

I understand what you're saying, but just to be a pedantic bastard, the Wraith is to the Eviscerator what the Black Widow is to the Widow.

Exactly. Wraith and Claymore are way different so why compare them? Yes they are both shotguns, but comparing a Claymore and a Wraith is like comparing the Kishok to the Valient. Same weapon catagory different usage set.

[Stardusk]

Kingston Atticus wrote...

Kenadian wrote...

I understand what you're saying, but just to be a pedantic bastard, the Wraith is to the Eviscerator what the Black Widow is to the Widow.

Exactly. Wraith and Claymore are way different so why compare them? Yes they are both shotguns, but comparing a Claymore and a Wraith is like comparing the Kishok to the Valient. Same weapon catagory different usage set.

Not really. Since changing the title to a question of whether the Wraith is better on a T.Soldier or a Claymore I think Marksman compensates for the fire delay.