Profit Hungry managers ruin games
#1
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:16
I paid $60 dollars for Dragon Age: Origins. After five hours of gameplay, the only substantive side quests in this painfully linear and horribly, horribly unoriginal storyline require that I purchase and download additional content.
This is offensive to my intelligence- and probably offensive to anyone who played BGII. If you don't feel the same way, then you should consider that you aren't smart enough to realize that you're the victim of an industry that has fallen by the wayside out of greed.
This game is, in no conceivable way, as immersive as BGII. Moreover, the developers clearly didn't care enough about the quality of this game to consider that having to pay $7 and spend time downloading additional content everytime you wanted to do a ****ing side-quest might ruin what little immersion this game could have potentially offered.
This game is a ****ing sham.
#2
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:20
Hell, in BG1 it takes a newbie player about 2 hours to do all the little side mission, search everything and get out of Candlekeep, While you're stuck in Candlekeep the game feels a lot smaller than it really is.. If you judged Baldur's Gate on the first 2 hours of gameplay, you'd be an idiot.
..Just saying..
Modifié par Rayvolution, 04 novembre 2009 - 07:21 .
#3
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:21
#4
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:24
You could get the feel of the BG series right away, even if you were stuck in the candlekeep or Irenicus's dungeon. You were free to move from location to location at will- though within certain limits. There were also more sidequests in the Candlekeep and Irenicus's dungeon than there have been so far total in DA:O.
Also, I didn't have to get on the internet, pay $7, and then download a patch to enter the Djinni's layer in Irenicus's dungeon to get Severok's sword.
Did I?
#5
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:26
MrGOH wrote...
Troll thread. Move along.
hahaha agreed.
#6
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:28
Do I not sound serious? Clearly neither of you have played any of the Baldur's Gate series. Either that or your standards for these types of games have been significantly lowered as a result of all the garbage that has come out since BGII.
#7
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:29
Regardless, 5 hours is NOT long enough to judge a game claimed to take "140 hours" to do everything in, before DLC. I think you're too quick to judge this game.
I still have my reservations, I've found points I don't like and points I do. But I too am only about 5 hours into the game, and I'm still pretty much "Just getting the ball rolling" inthe storyline. So it's expected to still be linear somewhat.
#8
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:30
#9
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:31
#10
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:32
#11
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:33
Can you honestly say that there is any justification for making us pay to download the substantive side quests, THE ****ING DAY THE GAME CAME OUT? You think there's so much content that they couldn't get it all on the disc?
You don't understand what people mean when they say troll.
#12
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:33
The storyline is very cliche and uninspired imo.
#13
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:34
#14
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:39
Sidequests in BGII- The Planar Sphere, the Shade Lord, Lord Firkraag, and the dozens of other in depth experiences that filled every zone. These are side quests. Some bull**** delivery quest that you'd find in World of Warcraft is not. The quests in this game are just a ****ty as the ones in MMOs, so is the plot.
Sadly, there is no PvP to make up for it.
#15
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:43
this is not a game for everyone, keep smile.
#16
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:45
If you want a game you REALLY have the right to moan about, go play Spore. now THERE'S a blatant ripoff and overhyped bit of garbage. But did I go to their website and complain? No. I just never played it again after I completed the game once.
You still haven't even given this game a chance, I gave Spore a chance! I even beat it! Don't call a game "bad" until you've actually played enough of the game to have the RIGHT to call it bad.
#17
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:47
Then I'll reinstall BG II. Ironically, I still haven't played all the classes or even experienced all of the content on the evil side.
DAO doesn't even have a ****ing evil side. It just has a douche, cliche good side.
#18
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:48
Fortunately, there's no pvp at all, people can play a mmorpg if they want pvp
#19
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:49
ReallyAngry6969 wrote...
Yea, the Warden's Keep is a SUBSTANTIVE side-quest. There's another one soon after it involving a golem controller rod or some nonsense. However, the part where you find the ring on that dead Templar and then give it to the guy in that town where you find Sten does not count as a side quest.
Sidequests in BGII- The Planar Sphere, the Shade Lord, Lord Firkraag, and the dozens of other in depth experiences that filled every zone. These are side quests. Some bull**** delivery quest that you'd find in World of Warcraft is not. The quests in this game are just a ****ty as the ones in MMOs, so is the plot.
Sadly, there is no PvP to make up for it.
Those were hybrid quests - you had to do some of them to advance the main quest. But go ahead, hate the game and troll the forum.
#20
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:50
#21
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:50
#22
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:52
#23
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 07:59
#24
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 08:01
And he's pissed because he can't play a DLC side quest without paying for it? LOL. See you at the Fallout 3, Oblivion, Mass Effect etc etc forums..
#25
Posté 04 novembre 2009 - 08:02
SlimCharles - every post I have seen from you is extremely negative, on multiple threads. If you hate the game this much stop playing it, and get off the forums.





Retour en haut






