megabeast37215 wrote...
You're being ridiculous. I have no dog in your fight with the PC guys... but seriously, the math on the Valiant doesn't add up to how it performs in game.
How you can bring two unrelated arguments together is just...?!? Anyway, I have no bone to pick with you, so...
Please tell me what soldier would pick a weapon that requires two headshots to kill an enemy, versus one that can kill an enemy just by touching them.
Are we still comparing Valiant II to BW X? Because that is patently ridiculous itself. Compare Valiant II with BW II, or Valiant X to BW X, or don't make any comparison at all.
megabeast37215 wrote...
My kid just unlocked the Valiant X on his account. Later tonight I'm going to do alot of testing/comparing and make a thread about it.
Just burst DPS and burst lengths for starters (to ridicule Stardusk's assertion). This is on all kits without taking into consideration any race/class/weapon mod/ammo related bonii:
Viper X ~426 DPS, ~5.1s per burst/being out of cover
Valiant II ~682DPS, ~1.8s per burst/being out of cover
clear winnerBW X ~924 DPS, 3s per burst/being out of cover
Valiant X ~859 DPS, ~1.8s per burst/being out of cover
No clear winner, and would depend largely on your play style. I'm sure you'd come to the same conclusion after your own testing.
Conclusion: uninformed, knee-jerk, idiotic OP with inflammatory title, from Stardusk.
Modifié par Kyrene, 02 décembre 2012 - 03:11 .