Aller au contenu

Photo

Who here is not bothered by the alleged Huntress bug?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
177 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Stardusk

Stardusk
  • Members
  • 6 353 messages
 I am not. I think she is well-balanced as such.

#2
Crimson Vanguard

Crimson Vanguard
  • Members
  • 6 130 messages
Go home Stardusk, you're drunk

#3
Topographer

Topographer
  • Members
  • 1 213 messages
The only way to balance her is to add the BPP.

#4
Stardusk

Stardusk
  • Members
  • 6 353 messages

Topographer wrote...

The only way to balance her is to add the BPP.


It would be a good weapon for her, no doubt.

#5
Crimson Vanguard

Crimson Vanguard
  • Members
  • 6 130 messages

Topographer wrote...

The only way to balance her is to add the BPP.

:lol:

#6
Guest_N7 Krisixus_*

Guest_N7 Krisixus_*
  • Guests
I am not bothered by it at all and I actually seem to find it more fun to use the huntress then any of the other infiltrators.

#7
kaileena_sands

kaileena_sands
  • Members
  • 1 489 messages
 I am not bothered since it seems she is a beast now... I cannot even imagine what she will be like with that weapon damage boost from TC. <3

#8
Homey C-Dawg

Homey C-Dawg
  • Members
  • 7 498 messages
I'm not losing any sleep over it one way or the other, but if it really is a bug they should fix it.

#9
Kogia

Kogia
  • Members
  • 1 156 messages
I just posted in the other big thread that I kind of like that they're trying to add in a bit of variation in Tactical Cloak, so I'm okay with it. However, if it is intended, as she doesn't get the weapon boost I'd like the boost to powers to be a bit more.

#10
Distilled Poison

Distilled Poison
  • Members
  • 1 361 messages
I find her to be boring. =/

#11
Road Wulf

Road Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 008 messages

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Go home Stardusk, you're drunk


Actually just go play, drunk, and record it with commentary.

Bound to be hilarious. Image IPB

#12
CitizenThom

CitizenThom
  • Members
  • 2 429 messages
I'm not bothered, I agree with what you said in the review. Power damage is more than sufficient.

Consider this:

Dark Channel plus the Huntress's power damage bonuses from cloak (40%, 65%, 80% or 105%) and passive (45%)... if you compare that damage per second to the damage per second of a weapon... how much of a weapon damage boost are you effectively getting with just Dark Channel?

With the 'Expose' evolution of Warp, add another 15%.

So at a minimum the Huntress has a 100% Dark Channel bonus on a Warped target then hit with Dark Channel from Tactical Cloak (40% + 45% + 15% = 100%).

SO whatever Dark Channel's base damage is when represented in proportion to your Weapon's DPS... you're at least multiplying it by two.

Playing with the Huntress on Gold with Duration on Tactical Cloak and a Wraith feels effective... and I'm probably not perfectly min/maxing with my build.

Modifié par CitizenThom, 03 décembre 2012 - 08:32 .


#13
HolyAvenger

HolyAvenger
  • Members
  • 13 848 messages
You know my feelings on the matter.

#14
Stardusk

Stardusk
  • Members
  • 6 353 messages

HolyAvenger wrote...

You know my feelings on the matter.


Sort of. You also know that duration is a waste on DC because everything is dead before the DOT is up, right?

#15
Daihannya

Daihannya
  • Members
  • 763 messages
The only thing I find annoying is to do the high weapons damage I need to run warp ammo 4. Dark Channel which doesn't miss then fire away.

But I'm thinking this is why they may not have given her weapons damage boost. Can you imagine warp ammo 4's 120% damage boost on a primed target plus TC weapons damage boost?

Modifié par Daihannya, 03 décembre 2012 - 08:37 .


#16
Stardusk

Stardusk
  • Members
  • 6 353 messages

Daihannya wrote...

The only thing I find annoying is to do the high weapons damage I need to run warp ammo 4. Dark Channel which doesn't miss then fire away.

But I'm thinking this is why they may not have given her weapons damage boost. Can you imagine warp ammo 4's 120% damage boost on a primed target plus TC weapons damage boost?


Exactly.

#17
HolyAvenger

HolyAvenger
  • Members
  • 13 848 messages

Stardusk wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

You know my feelings on the matter.


Sort of. You also know that duration is a waste on DC because everything is dead before the DOT is up, right?


I need to switch my build and see for myself, but the argument makes sense.

#18
Badpanzer

Badpanzer
  • Members
  • 1 921 messages
I play with a melee build and she is fine..I think her TC is functioning as intended..she is just different which is cool.

#19
Edwardian070580

Edwardian070580
  • Members
  • 142 messages
just add a few points in warp and you got a debuff anyway so dnt really miss the extra damage

#20
FellowMusicFan

FellowMusicFan
  • Members
  • 242 messages
Yeah, but that would imply Infiltrators are balanced. She should be just as unbalanced as the rest of them. What I would personally like to see is a weapon damage buff but ONLY the initial 40% from the power itself. On track 4 of her evo just have it be pure power damage. She's a great character as now but feels so damn misplaced without SOME sort of damage buff to weapons from Tac Cloak. It just HAS to be there. It is an Infiltrator staple.

Modifié par FellowMusicFan, 03 décembre 2012 - 08:57 .


#21
Daihannya

Daihannya
  • Members
  • 763 messages

Stardusk wrote...

Daihannya wrote...

The only thing I find annoying is to do the high weapons damage I need to run warp ammo 4. Dark Channel which doesn't miss then fire away.

But I'm thinking this is why they may not have given her weapons damage boost. Can you imagine warp ammo 4's 120% damage boost on a primed target plus TC weapons damage boost?


Exactly.


My only other problem though is its hard to sometimes figure out where DC went after you kill one target.   It would have been nice to just keep firing away, at the other mooks.  But I often DC again just to make sure.

Warp is only useful on bosses and for detonation.   Stupid mooks keep dodging it. 

#22
Kalas Magnus

Kalas Magnus
  • Members
  • 10 327 messages

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Go home Stardusk, you're drunk

this.

Defending a bugged character, unbelievable. 

#23
Stardusk

Stardusk
  • Members
  • 6 353 messages

Kalas321 wrote...

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Go home Stardusk, you're drunk

this.

Defending a bugged character, unbelievable. 


Why is she bugged? because she can't one clip a Platinum Banshess with a Reegar?

#24
Kalas Magnus

Kalas Magnus
  • Members
  • 10 327 messages

Stardusk wrote...

Kalas321 wrote...

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Go home Stardusk, you're drunk

this.

Defending a bugged character, unbelievable. 


Why is she bugged? because she can't one clip a Platinum Banshess with a Reegar?

You plan on abusing the warp+incendiary bug?

I'm pro infiltrator nerfs. Where other people say characters like the ghost are balanced I know they are OP. I wouldnt mind if they were nerfed again.

I want powers to work correctly though. Everyone knows tc adds power,melee, and weapon damage.

Modifié par Kalas321, 03 décembre 2012 - 09:09 .


#25
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 356 messages
Performance is irrelevant. If there is a bug in the character's abilities they should be fixed.

I'm not expecting the fix to happen on Tuesday, but it should still be fixed.