Who here is not bothered by the alleged Huntress bug?
#151
Posté 03 décembre 2012 - 07:00
In the heat of the game I forget that I have cloak anyway.
#152
Posté 03 décembre 2012 - 07:02
Stardusk wrote...
I am not. I think she is well-balanced as such.
You are full of weird ideas.
#153
Posté 03 décembre 2012 - 07:16
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
#154
Posté 03 décembre 2012 - 07:38
Seriously speaking, getting the full damage bonus for weapons might be too much. How about a compromise: half of her TC bonus is applied to weapon damage?
#155
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:55
Aedolon wrote...
I don't understand why some people think fixing her would make her too powerful. How would updating the power description affect gameplay in any way?
Seriously speaking, getting the full damage bonus for weapons might be too much. How about a compromise: half of her TC bonus is applied to weapon damage?
No it wouldn't be too much , she should be able to do just as much weapon damage as the rest of the infiltrators can.
Modifié par Enhanced, 04 décembre 2012 - 01:18 .
#156
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 01:00
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
#157
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 01:35
Distilled Poison wrote...
I find her to be boring. =/
#158
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 01:36
people that are mad are just people perpetually pissed off at BW.
#159
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 01:42
Modifié par Paradise Ablaze, 04 décembre 2012 - 01:42 .
#160
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:26
CitizenThom wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
There's another character in the game with every power she has. So why should I use her when I can just use the Fury to DC + detonate? Or TC + sniper\\Claymore on every other infiltrator?
Modifié par sc_ajk29, 04 décembre 2012 - 12:29 .
#161
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:31
sc_ajk29 wrote...
CitizenThom wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
There's another character in the game with every power she has. So why should I use her when I can just use the Fury to DC + detonate? Or TC + sniperClaymore on every other infiltrator?
Uhm...105% multiplicative power damage +45% power damage passive. That's why.
#162
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:32
sc_ajk29 wrote...
CitizenThom wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
There's another character in the game with every power she has. So why should I use her when I can just use the Fury to DC + detonate?
So? The Fury uses - if at all - DC in a different way then the Huntress does. Most other kits with Warp use it as a Primer or simple debuff, not to set off BEs and actually do respectable damage to some defenses. Since cloak seems to be the favorite power of many, I don't see how "recycling" it is a bad thing, even more since they actually tried something new with the Huntress' TC.
Not to mention that the Huntress' signature power - DC - is hardly as over-recycled than for example Incinerate.
#163
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:38
spudspot wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
CitizenThom wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
There's another character in the game with every power she has. So why should I use her when I can just use the Fury to DC + detonate?
So? The Fury uses - if at all - DC in a different way then the Huntress does. Most other kits with Warp use it as a Primer or simple debuff, not to set off BEs and actually do respectable damage to some defenses. Since cloak seems to be the favorite power of many, I don't see how "recycling" it is a bad thing, even more since they actually tried something new with the Huntress' TC.
Not to mention that the Huntress' signature power - DC - is hardly as over-recycled than for example Incinerate.
Meh, whatever floats your boat. Myself, I don't see much of an incentive to use her (like every other Retaliation character after the first four, except maybe the Trooper) when everything can be accomplished with a pre-Retaliation character. But that's just me.
Now, if they gave her Dominate or Flare instead...
Modifié par sc_ajk29, 04 décembre 2012 - 12:40 .
#164
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:49
#165
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 12:50
sc_ajk29 wrote...
spudspot wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
CitizenThom wrote...
sc_ajk29 wrote...
Leland Gaunt wrote...
I don't bother because she's boring.
^This. I don't find recycled characters all that interesting.
There's another character in the game with tactical cloak, dark channel, and warp?
There's another character in the game with every power she has. So why should I use her when I can just use the Fury to DC + detonate?
So? The Fury uses - if at all - DC in a different way then the Huntress does. Most other kits with Warp use it as a Primer or simple debuff, not to set off BEs and actually do respectable damage to some defenses. Since cloak seems to be the favorite power of many, I don't see how "recycling" it is a bad thing, even more since they actually tried something new with the Huntress' TC.
Not to mention that the Huntress' signature power - DC - is hardly as over-recycled than for example Incinerate.
Meh, whatever floats your boat. Myself, I don't see much of an incentive to use her (like every other Retaliation character after the first four, except maybe the Trooper) when everything can be accomplished with a pre-Retaliation character. But that's just me.
Now, if they gave her Dominate or Flare instead...
Good thing you don't have to use her.
#166
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 01:02
i have also had good results with her, but i keep not getting the respec i need to put her warp back to BE/debuff instead of damage/damage.
#167
Posté 04 décembre 2012 - 02:16
#168
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:01
#169
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:08
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
"Alleged"
The bug was confirmed today, so it is no longer alleged.
As I have said before. If she had lift grenades or cluster grenades, along with warp, I'd be in agreement that she is fine as she is. But as it stands now, I feel that the other characters with warp are much stronger since their kits currently all have better synergy than one that has a power that is, in essence, less powerful than incinerate.
#170
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:11
Modifié par CitizenThom, 05 décembre 2012 - 04:11 .
#171
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:22
CitizenThom wrote...
The Huntress is not a Fury or a Valkyrie... if that's the way you're playing her...you're doing it wrong.
How else would you play her? As far as I can tell the best way to play her right now is to sit in a corner, hide, and cast DC. If you are playing her based on warp, her powers are, at best, slightly worse than the other characters with warp.
#172
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:43
If BW fixes the TC bug, I'd be happy, but the Huntress would instantly rise up to TGI / GI levels in terms of potency.
Modifié par Locutus_of_BORG, 05 décembre 2012 - 04:45 .
#173
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 04:46
#174
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 09:47
I just really really want Tactical Cloak Evolution 6 to be a bit better. Since it's additive, it's debateable if an extra 25% power damage is really worth 11 points. It's a pretty small increase in actual damage. In practice, it's roughly a 9-10% boost to effective power damage (~7% with equipment), compared to getting Fitness to rank 4 without sacrificing points from Warp/DC and class passive.
...But they probably should fix the bug. It's just a weird one. If nothing else Tactical Cloak's description should be accurate.
Modifié par EvanKester, 05 décembre 2012 - 09:59 .
#175
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 01:44





Retour en haut







