539 réponses à ce sujet

[dreman9999]

J. Reezy wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

J. Reezy wrote...

Really? The amount of updates it gets is your criteria for "tacked on multiplayer"?

Indeed, especially since it is those updates that make it a actual, full-fledged experience. MP out of the box was a clear-cut tack job.

Oh it's a full-fledged MP experience now? How many game modes does it have?

It 's a strong co-op experiance.It does not matter how many modes it has. Borderlands also has a strong mp experiance and it barely has any modes.

[LieutenantSarcasm]

J. Reezy wrote...

Oh it's a full-fledged MP experience now? How many game modes does it have?

It's only one, but it's as much content as many other MPs are now. I'm not happy about it, but at least it's somewhat capable with the DLC.

[KingZayd]

dreman9999 wrote...

J. Reezy wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

J. Reezy wrote...

Really? The amount of updates it gets is your criteria for "tacked on multiplayer"?

Indeed, especially since it is those updates that make it a actual, full-fledged experience. MP out of the box was a clear-cut tack job.

Oh it's a full-fledged MP experience now? How many game modes does it have?

It 's a strong co-op experiance.It does not matter how many modes it has. Borderlands also has a strong mp experiance and it barely has any modes.

The entire game is coop. That's as strong mp experience as you're going to get.
Mass Effect 3's mp experience is nothing in comparison.

[dreamgazer]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

Absolutely.

[cavs25]

dreman9999 wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

LMAO the first sentence
All your choices culminated in Mass Effect 3
Ohh my godddddddd hahahahhaahahhaahahahahah

I'm not surprised though. These is are the same journalist that gave it over 75 perfect scores 
Has nothing to do with the fanbase

4 different versions of destroy.
3 different versions of control.


And some how choice does not matter.

Your attacking an argument I didn't make...Strawman?
Ahh those choice have nothing to do with past choices.....
Is just trown at you at the end to make the mighty so important war assets mean something
and they still dont mean crap lolz
so many different endingssssssss

Sorry.Ems is effect by all choices. Add Tuchanka is controled by your choices in ME1 and 2 and rennoch is effect by the choices in ME2. It matters not that you have other means to make up that ems.  More options is not a minus. The entire point with the choice are based on how it effect later on in the plot. The multiple game ending is just that.
It only does not matter if the results are always the same no matter what you do. Thatis not the case in ME3 with ec.

Nothing matters though
you killled the rachni queen? Here you go a new one
You killed wrex?, here is his brother
Mordin is dead?, here is another salarian
You kill the geth you get quarian support and vice versa
You cure the genophage you get krogan support, you don't and you get the same support from the salarians.
Saved the collector's base? Who cares
EMS is just a number...Your decisions are in no way reflected in the endings
Despite who supports you, priority earth will always be the same....and the tacked on, out of place endings abadon all previous mass effect themes in a matter of seconds

[Someone With Mass]

dreman9999 wrote...
It 's a strong co-op experiance.It does not matter how many modes it has. Borderlands also has a strong mp experiance and it barely has any modes.

Except for the duels, arena battles, races and raid bosses.

[LieutenantSarcasm]

dreamgazer wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

Absolutely.

Also agreed, but it still didn't get enough recognition. It was oversadowed is all I really meant.

[Matchy Pointy]

Does anyone even really care about these things?

[ObserverStatus]

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...
Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

Absolutely.

Also agreed, but it still didn't get enough recognition. It was oversadowed is all I really meant.

It totally was an injustice, Metroid Prime 3 was the best game of 2007.

[Ghost Lightning]

bobobo878 wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...
Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

Absolutely.

Also agreed, but it still didn't get enough recognition. It was oversadowed is all I really meant.

It totally was an injustice, Metroid Prime 3 was the best game of 2007.

No Halo 3

[Maximazed]

Well lets see.
Halo 4 to me was a huge disappointment.
Black Ops II was pretty much more of the same, plus they sort of ruined the natural progression of the series(Modern Warfare is pretty much it's own series).
Haven't played any Assassin's Creed games, but the fact that this one takes place during the American Revolutionary war may persuade me otherwise.
Haven't played Borderlands I or II either. Probably should change that.
Mass Effect 3 was pretty enjoyable for me. Just finished my second play-through. The only thing that bugs me is how the ending just loses the momentum.
As for best DLC, I'm surprised they didn't go for Dawnguard, but for how Bethesda treats PS3 users I'm glad they didn't get it.

[dreman9999]

cavs25 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

LMAO the first sentence
All your choices culminated in Mass Effect 3
Ohh my godddddddd hahahahhaahahhaahahahahah

I'm not surprised though. These is are the same journalist that gave it over 75 perfect scores 
Has nothing to do with the fanbase

4 different versions of destroy.
3 different versions of control.


And some how choice does not matter.

Your attacking an argument I didn't make...Strawman?
Ahh those choice have nothing to do with past choices.....
Is just trown at you at the end to make the mighty so important war assets mean something
and they still dont mean crap lolz
so many different endingssssssss

Sorry.Ems is effect by all choices. Add Tuchanka is controled by your choices in ME1 and 2 and rennoch is effect by the choices in ME2. It matters not that you have other means to make up that ems.  More options is not a minus. The entire point with the choice are based on how it effect later on in the plot. The multiple game ending is just that.
It only does not matter if the results are always the same no matter what you do. Thatis not the case in ME3 with ec.

Nothing matters though
you killled the rachni queen? Here you go a new one
You killed wrex?, here is his brother
Mordin is dead?, here is another salarian
You kill the geth you get quarian support and vice versa
You cure the genophage you get krogan support, you don't and you get the same support from the salarians.
Saved the collector's base? Who cares
EMS is just a number...Your decisions are in no way reflected in the endings
Despite who supports you, priority earth will always be the same....and the tacked on, out of place endings abadon all previous mass effect themes in a matter of seconds

With the rachni queen,And Wreave it clear has an effect becasue they are different people.
The clone betrays you while the original does not.. We can't say it doesnot matter if we have a different result.

Wreave is a war munger and only leaves the krogan the same while Wrex up lift them.  Clearly a different result
If you get quarian support or geth support, it clear a race had to die to get it. that still is a different results, especially when youcan save them both.

The collector base, it's the difference between blowing up the entire galexy or not at low ems.

War is based on stats. EMS being numbersdoes nto make it any less. Being that it's based on choice, chioce inheritly matters.

[djspectre]

LinksOcarina wrote...

djspectre wrote...

I like ME3, but only half as much as ME1 or 2. It's not a GOTY for me.

This reminds me of Lord of the Rings Return of the King winning 11 Oscars....only because it was the end of a large story that took a trilogy to tell. (the other two movies were better, but didn't win any awards in the years of their releases).

ME3 is similar to LOTR trilogy in that I think all the praise from the previous two games was being put on the 3rd game because together they all act as a single story.

Well, is that necessarily a bad thing? 

No, but only in the sense that I'm glad the trilogy is finally getting some awards recognition. 

It IS a bad thing in the sense that they are heaping praise on a game that wasn't fully QA'd at launch and is still felt to be underwhelming by everyone who matters: the fans. 

Why couldn't they have given ME1 or ME2 any kind of awards or recongition? in 2007 and 2010?

Modifié par djspectre, 05 décembre 2012 - 05:10 .

[dreman9999]

Someone With Mass wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
It 's a strong co-op experiance.It does not matter how many modes it has. Borderlands also has a strong mp experiance and it barely has any modes.

Except for the duels, arena battles, races and raid bosses.

I said barely any modes, not just one. Clearly other mp have much morethan that.

[Mcfly616]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Did ME1 win GOTY?

In one of the greatest injustices of all gaming, not nearly as much as it should have.

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

too bad it was COD4 that won GOTY that year. ME1 was runner up

[dreman9999]

Mcfly616 wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Did ME1 win GOTY?

In one of the greatest injustices of all gaming, not nearly as much as it should have.

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

too bad it was COD4 that won GOTY that year. ME1 was runner up

No it was Bioshock fallowed by Mario galexy. Cod4 just sold the most.

[dreman9999]

J. Reezy wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Did ME1 win GOTY?

In one of the greatest injustices of all gaming, not nearly as much as it should have.

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

too bad it was COD4 that won GOTY that year. ME1 was runner up

We're talking about GI in this thread.

Yes. in GI it was Bioshock in 2007.

[Mcfly616]

djspectre wrote...

LinksOcarina wrote...

djspectre wrote...

I like ME3, but only half as much as ME1 or 2. It's not a GOTY for me.

This reminds me of Lord of the Rings Return of the King winning 11 Oscars....only because it was the end of a large story that took a trilogy to tell. (the other two movies were better, but didn't win any awards in the years of their releases).

ME3 is similar to LOTR trilogy in that I think all the praise from the previous two games was being put on the 3rd game because together they all act as a single story.

Well, is that necessarily a bad thing? 

No, but only in the sense that I'm glad the trilogy is finally getting some awards recognition. 

It IS a bad thing in the sense that they are heaping praise on a game that wasn't fully QA'd at launch and is still felt to be underwhelming by everyone who matters: the fans. 

Why couldn't they have given ME1 or ME2 any kind of awards or recongition? in 2007 and 2010?

please, you don't speak for all fans....or even the majority of them.

[SNascimento]

Well deserved.

ME3 is a fantastic game. Everyone should acknowledge this. It's not perfect as ME2 was, but it still GOTY worth.

[Mcfly616]

dreman9999 wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Did ME1 win GOTY?

In one of the greatest injustices of all gaming, not nearly as much as it should have.

Bioshock is a clearly superior game to ME1; there was no injustice there.

too bad it was COD4 that won GOTY that year. ME1 was runner up

No it was Bioshock fallowed by Mario galexy. Cod4 just sold the most.

as I've said, many publications select a game of the year. I know for a fact that several chose COD4 and then ME1 runner up. What publication were you referring to?

Edit: sorry....didnt know we were solely speaking of GI

Modifié par Mcfly616, 05 décembre 2012 - 05:27 .

[LinksOcarina]

djspectre wrote...

LinksOcarina wrote...

djspectre wrote...

I like ME3, but only half as much as ME1 or 2. It's not a GOTY for me.

This reminds me of Lord of the Rings Return of the King winning 11 Oscars....only because it was the end of a large story that took a trilogy to tell. (the other two movies were better, but didn't win any awards in the years of their releases).

ME3 is similar to LOTR trilogy in that I think all the praise from the previous two games was being put on the 3rd game because together they all act as a single story.

Well, is that necessarily a bad thing? 

No, but only in the sense that I'm glad the trilogy is finally getting some awards recognition. 

It IS a bad thing in the sense that they are heaping praise on a game that wasn't fully QA'd at launch and is still felt to be underwhelming by everyone who matters: the fans. 

Why couldn't they have given ME1 or ME2 any kind of awards or recongition? in 2007 and 2010?

Well, perhaps they weren't ready to give it praise yet. 

Its easy to look back in hindsight as it being a slight against the series, but its also a product of its time then too. In the end, the series is finally taking its place in that pantheon where it belongs, which is something the fans should be happy about. 

[FlamingBoy]

I am getting extremely suspicious with these game of the year awards atm

[EnvyTB075]

MegaSovereign wrote...

No one ever mentions how the reputation system has been fixed to where Paragades aren't penalized for not having either paragon/renegade bar filled up. To me that's a huge improvement since before I'd have to glitch or cheat with my paragades in order to resolve conflicts that would need high Paragon or Renegade.

Fixed? It made the whole paragon/renegade dynamic pointless.

dreman9999 wrote...
1. Sniper rifles, which have longer barrels then the other guns, have been doing most damage since ME1.
Also, we had barrel upgrades since ME1.

Thats because they have a longer internal rail, not an poop added onto the end.

dreman9999 wrote...
2. Auto diaolgue has not effected role playing out side of the people who want to play as psychos.

No Dreman, you are wrong and you should feel bad. Go home.

Modifié par EnvyTB075, 05 décembre 2012 - 05:32 .