We don't have to buy DA3
#1
Posté 05 décembre 2012 - 07:49
Every peice of information Bioware has given us about DA3 has been bad news. You know why Skyrim was so succesful? It excited people with new features and cool things. Everything we have seen about DA3 is talking about the bad things in DA2 that are staying. Everything we saw about DA2 was all the features being removed from Origins. Good job Bioware!
As for me, I'll be waiting for the next bit of info. If Its the same BS we've been getting, I'm done.
#2
Posté 07 décembre 2012 - 07:33
#3
Posté 07 décembre 2012 - 05:42
#4
Posté 07 décembre 2012 - 09:25
The biggest problem they have on PC is that I could simply download the winter forge and make my own awesome items. All they could really provide is more lore/content/campaigns. Even DA2 has an addon where I can summon any item, even promo items and even Collectors Edition items and use them. This is not a problem on xbox or PS3 but on PC it is. ORIGIN has the potential to provide the security to let them sell us DLC for individual items to full blown expansions without the threat of players feeling ripped off because someone makes a hack or learns the developer console commands.
They have a lot to live up to and cant go back now when they could have released official hi rez texture packs etc. to keep the game alive. Now they have pissed off half of their playerbase that was fully content to simply buy more DLC, even with all of the hacks out there.
Not to go off topic, but there is an emerging market of gamers in their mid thirties that are the first generation to grow up with computers and serious games in their homes, for play and pleasure, not work, that are simply not being serviced. You may think that you need to tap that young generation market because they are naive and have money to blow, but I am older, want difficult games and have much more money to blow than any 15 year old xbox gamer.
#5
Posté 08 décembre 2012 - 10:27
#6
Posté 09 décembre 2012 - 05:52
After all, they have shown that they can learn from previous mistakes, look at Mass Effect 3.
From ME 1 to ME 2 they improved combat, but overly simplified the RPG elements (skill tree and item customization). In ME 3 they combined elements from both games by having a more fleshed out skill tree and some item customization (still not at the level of the first game, but I will take what I can get).
They say that DA 3 will be a combination of the previous two games. This gives me hope, but I will have to see the game first before I make any decisions.
I'm not a huge fan of the new look Dragon Age has received with it's second installment. Also I HATE the new JRPG combat style it has going. Every time I saw someone swing a massive two-handed sword like a toothpick it just took me out of the game. It was constantly taking me out of the moment and reminding me that I'm playing a game... it broke my immersion.
#7
Guest_Faerunner_*
Posté 09 décembre 2012 - 09:49
Guest_Faerunner_*
#8
Posté 12 décembre 2012 - 09:15
Faerunner wrote...
Trust me, I'm not buying it. I've been replaying some of my favorite RPG's and checking out some Kickstarter projects made by people who actually LIKE traditional RPG's. (Obsidian's Project Eternity in particular sounds promising.) Bioware can keep their mediocre CoD/ME/Skyrim clones, I'm playing good quality RPG's.
? There's no similarity between Bioware games and Bethesda (Skyrim), other than that they're all good, up to DA:Origins. Are you saying DA3 will be a Skyrim clone? I doubt that very much.
Personally, I'm prepared to give Bioware another chance. We'll see.
#9
Guest_Faerunner_*
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 02:12
Guest_Faerunner_*
bEVEsthda wrote...
Faerunner wrote...
Trust me, I'm not buying it. I've been replaying some of my favorite RPG's and checking out some Kickstarter projects made by people who actually LIKE traditional RPG's. (Obsidian's Project Eternity in particular sounds promising.) Bioware can keep their mediocre CoD/ME/Skyrim clones, I'm playing good quality RPG's.
? There's no similarity between Bioware games and Bethesda (Skyrim), other than that they're all good, up to DA:Origins. Are you saying DA3 will be a Skyrim clone? I doubt that very much.
I notice you don't deny DA2 is basically a CoD/ME clone.
Skyrim gets praised for its striking visuals and landscapes, and you don't think it's a coincidence that BioWare pours an obscene amount of time and money into DA3's visuals and landscapes too? ME2 was popular while BioWare was making DA2 and they put game features in, and it turned out to be a mediocre fantasy counterpart to ME2. Now Skyrim is popular while they're making DA3 and they've admitted they're putting Skyrim features in it and you don't think it's likely to turn into an uninspired copy based on their track record? (Sure, make DA sequels like every game BUT the game they're sequels of. DA:O was such a critical and financial failure that drastic changes are not only understandable, but necessary.)
Personally, I'm prepared to give Bioware another chance. We'll see.
Your game. I've got better ways to spend my money.
Modifié par Faerunner, 13 décembre 2012 - 02:20 .
#10
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 03:17
Also, Skyrim is actually in no way a perfect, or even, say, a good game. In fact I'd be as bold as to say that even DA2 beats it storywise. And DA2 didn't really have much of a great story to begin with. At least BW games are not so bugged they're basically unplayable for a year after their release and they actually appreciate all of their playerbase, as opposed to Bethesda who seem to love kissing up to xbox users and kick other people in the butt and straight out lie to their faces. The pretty visuals do not really help Skyrim's case when you can barely move from one town to another without a gamefreeze.
So yeah, I am guessing DA3 will not actually be nothing like Skyrim (except perhaps for ~pretty graphics~ that are always welcome) since it will probably have an actual story and will be playable for the most part on all platforms.
But I digress. Whatever comes will come in its time. It's too early to be making any decisions about anything.
#11
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 08:55
FaWa wrote...
Every peice of information Bioware has given us about DA3 has been bad news.
What do you consider to be bad news? Please provide some examples if you're going to make statements to this effect. Personally I have found what little info BioWare has thrown our way to be intriguing in some instances but far too limited and vague to form any concrete impression of.
FaWa wrote...
You know why Skyrim was so succesful?
Because it played it safe, rinsing and repeating the same gameplay and structure that has served Bethsoft so well to date while providing certain minor, and frequently requested tweaks (e.g. dual-wielding, kill cams, improved third person view, and fancier kill animations). I count myself as a fan but nowhere near as much as any BioWare game you care to name.
As to the "indie is better" mentality you're expressing, indie games are far more hit and miss than studio ones. Some are great, but others are painfully unplayable, though generally at least cheaper than big name games. I'm hoping Project Eternity is good, but I don't info to go on: kind of like DA3.
I would like to point out that the Obisidian games I have most enjoyed were sequels to other developers' franchises (Fallout: New Vegas and KOTOR II). I thought Alpha Protocol was awful, which is a shame since its setting was novel for an RPG.
You know what? I am probably going to buy Dragon Age III and may very well pre-order it, depending to my reaction to ACTUAL information about the game (and to a lesser extent, on pre-order bonuses). I may also one day purchase Project Eternity, based of course on reviews and word-of-mouth, rather than on the fact that it's an old-school WRPG, whatever that means. There are many old RPGs, most of them significantly different in gameplay and mechanics and some of them utterly sucking. A lot of the games list here are old enough to be considered "old-school" RPGs.
I might even pick up the enhanced version of Baldur's Gate if it's heavily discounted on Steam one of these days. I don't believe in paying top dollar for HD rereleases unless it's something I really, really love (e.g. FFXII if Square decided to go that route).
P.S. Shouldn't this be in the DA3 forum? I call shenanigans!!
Modifié par The Teryn of Whatever, 13 décembre 2012 - 08:56 .
#12
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 11:51
Mass Effect 3 had an illogical ending and provided zero closure until they spent a bunch a months adding a DLC and don't get me started on day 1 character DLC non-sense which should be available to all those who pre-order/buy new regardless of editions.
I am extremely dissapointed. Mass Effect 4 and Dragon Age 3 will not be on my pre-order list at all. I suggest you look at obsidians Eternity for a true classic RPG that isn't a rush job.
Modifié par kingsims, 31 décembre 2012 - 11:56 .
#13
Guest_DuckSoup_*
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 02:15
Guest_DuckSoup_*
1. Don't like the company.
2. Were disappointed with the previous games/endings/ideas.
3. Your friends think it sucks.
Besides what someone else hates you may love and visa versa. Best to just wait and rent it, imo.
#14
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 08:25
The point is this: Many people have always been mad at Bioware, you should see the discussion and arguments we had when Mass Effect rolled around, with its focus on cinematics and the dialogue wheel. A small number of very vocal people, it seems, still have issues with Bioware not including turnbased combat in BG1 and BG2.
It is nothing new that people are mad at Bioware - however, Bioware, like us, need to evolve to stay alive.
#15
Guest_Snoop Lion_*
Posté 01 janvier 2013 - 02:24
Guest_Snoop Lion_*
#16
Posté 01 janvier 2013 - 03:49
Beyond that, it should be clarified that the game is not an RPG. The protagonist is unchangeable aside from his choices.
Modifié par Alocormin, 02 janvier 2013 - 04:34 .
#17
Posté 01 janvier 2013 - 07:37
#18
Posté 06 janvier 2013 - 10:09
#19
Posté 07 janvier 2013 - 03:29
The first game would start with your recruitment into the Grey Wardens. The focus would be learning what it means to be a warden, developing relationships with the wardens, and finally learning of the blight. The game would end at Ostagar. The second game would start in Flemeth's hut. The focus would be on building an army, rebuilding the Grey Wardens, and dealing with Loghain's betrayal. The Third game would deal with fighting the blight, and conclude the conflict with Loghain.
That ship set sail long ago though.
I don't really care for the direction they are moving the story.
Modifié par vinak, 07 janvier 2013 - 03:35 .
#20
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 07 janvier 2013 - 03:33
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
I know people on this forum (not personally) that are older than most here who enjoyed DA ][, who've been playing RPGs since they came out. So, pardon me if i don't agree with your blanket and incorrect logic that RPG fans don't like Bioware's games.
#21
Posté 07 janvier 2013 - 05:17
#22
Posté 07 janvier 2013 - 08:32
#23
Posté 08 janvier 2013 - 06:14
#24
Posté 10 janvier 2013 - 05:02
FaWa wrote...
Every peice of information Bioware has given us about DA3 has been bad news. You know why Skyrim was so succesful? It excited people with new features and cool things. Everything we have seen about DA3 is talking about the bad things in DA2 that are staying. Everything we saw about DA2 was all the features being removed from Origins. Good job Bioware!
I can understand that feeling. Inquisition is going to return the voiced protagonist and the paraphrasing from Dragon Age II, it's going to be "human only" again, and it's uncertain if the atheist option will actually return for players who dislike being limited to a religiously Andrastian protagonist. I think I'm not alone as one of the people who will wait to see what the reviews, and other players, have to say about Inquisition once it's released.
#25
Posté 11 janvier 2013 - 07:19





Retour en haut







