Yeah... I wouldn't want to see the whole Andraste da Vinci Code thing either, sorry OP.
Most of the stuff I'm interested in has already been mentioned in the games, but could use with more elaboration, such as the Qunari.
simfamSP wrote...
Thinking on it, I feel that the narrative should always come before the allegory, or at least, the 'moral.' Touching upon topics can feel forced; uninspired and cheap. The last thing anybody wants it to go through Dragon Age Three only to see 'topic #1' being shoved down your throat.
"HA HA, SEE WHAT WE DID THERE? SLAVERY AND MORALS! RIGHT? RIGHT?"
Meh Star Trek has been doing that for decades, very openly, and it's a highly popular franchise.
sandellniklas wrote...
I'd like for them to take the story in a more Song of Ice and Fire-direction, especially the whole noble-houses/factions trying to manipulate each other to gain power. We had a bit of that in Origins with Dwarwen Nobles and the the Human Noble background, as well as Loghain and Howe, but I think a civil war in Orlais would be a golden opportunity to have more politics and cloak and dagger. My favorite parts of the Song of Ice and Fire books are the part in Westeros where the great houses clash not only on the battlefield, but mor behind the senes. It would be amazing to decide whether you want to take care of business Ned Stark-style or Cersei Lannister-style.
I would not want this AT ALL. It's fun to read about
other people, but I wouldn't want
my character dealing with all of that crap. At some point I would just be like "OMG F all you people *leave*." All of the lies, manipulations, hidden motivations would get real old, real quick. I could only handle that in small doses. I didn't like it when I played a dwarven noble, and I didn't like it when I had to deal with people's petty disputes in DAA as the Warden-Commander Arlessa of Amaranthine.
Modifié par nightscrawl, 06 décembre 2012 - 03:38 .