Would you romance an ugly character?
#201
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 12:22
But you gotta know that would be modded so fast. It'd be out faster than the nude mods, even.
#202
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 12:27
Saibh wrote...
So long as they were not cartoonishly ugly to the point where it was hard to look at them talk without laughing, sure.
But you gotta know that would be modded so fast. It'd be out faster than the nude mods, even.
Yeah, physical appearance is one of the first things to be modded in video games. Just look at all the mods for Skyrim. Attractiveness matters, and while it's shallow, it's also just part of being human. Very few people can honestly say that they don't register physical appearance.
Modifié par Sable Rhapsody, 10 décembre 2012 - 12:27 .
#203
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 02:06
Darth Death wrote...
If all the LI in-game (both men & women) looked like utter trash, would you still romance him/her anyway? <3
That would depend on my PC.
Laerk: Hell yeah, I'd hit that. We're still on the 'all bi' thing, aren't we? Can they just form a line over there?
Thari: Ew. Never.
Brunnar: Hey, if they can look past my ugly mug, who am I to judge?
Niv: Pft. Romance.
Fedaris: She can quote the entire third chapter of Hesaron's Theory of Symbols and Lyrium Laylines, and cook the best lasagna this side of Antiva. I'm in love.
#204
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 02:22
Elton John is dead wrote...
Would an ugly character romance YOU?
...Probably not of her own free will. But that's what blood magic is for!
Sorry, the opportunity was too good to pass up.
#205
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 09:30
Elton John is dead wrote...
Would an ugly character romance YOU?
probably not. i have a lousy personality.
#206
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 09:32
In a video game, to be honest, I'm not sure if I would, but I would definetly could enjoy exploring the option to do so, and I think it could possibly be an interesting experience.
#207
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 09:55
Why would i romance a hidious thing when i have romanced beautiful and handsome ones before, it would be a step back.
Dont include nasty looking LI
#208
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 01:03
esper wrote...
Sylvanpyxie wrote...
In appearance? Sure. In personality? Hells yes.Would you romance an ugly character?
Personalities of companions and love interests have been as fresh faced and pretty boyed as their appearances. If I had the option to romance a truly horrible human being, in both personality and appearance, I might actually pursue it of my own accord, if only to escape the fangirl(boy) tripe that Bioware have been trying to feed me.
Oh yeah, yeah I went there.
This is actually interesting, but I imagine that it is even harder to do, because if what is ugly in appearence is subjective, what is ugly in personality is even more so.
They Li would properly have to be an ax-crazy baby eating cannibal for all us to agree that they have an ugly personality.
I'm not even sure that would be enough. After all, a possessed terrorist who used the PC's feelings to manipulate him/her (if you're in a romance with him, he's all about the "if you love me you'll do this") is not considered too ugly to romance even after this is known.
Then there was the spy who admitted that she thought killing someone just after sex was a kindness. And she was right -- it was far kinder than the torture she inflicted on others before killing them, though she admittedly did not like torturing and killing, though she also admittedly loved the hunt.
Then again, I loved the romance of a character who described murder and power in almost orgasmic ways and described a dubious consentual encounter (some people take it as an outright rape, though that wasn't the author's intention). This was another character who thought it was a kindness to kill someone after sex, especially if the sex was really good.
No matter how ugly the actions of the love interest, if the character itself appeals to someone, they're appealling.
Edit: If they were to make ugly love interests, dwarves, old, whatever, there would be people doing them to make jokes about it (like they made ugly PCs in DAO just to FRAPS the scenes and post them on youtube or laugh about Alistair "scrogging" a dwarf). I don't think it would be a love interest that anyone took seriously unless the person was tortured. And then, well, you have a Phantom of the Opera situation which isn't so bad.
Modifié par ejoslin, 10 décembre 2012 - 01:12 .
#209
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 05:04
Celene II wrote...
No
Why would i romance a hidious thing when i have romanced beautiful and handsome ones before, it would be a step back.
Dont include nasty looking LI
I don't see how it would be a step back so long as ugly romance option isn't the only one. It would provide variety...
On the other hand we can always just create an ugly Warden (and laugh when Leliana or Zevran compliment them on their handsomeness or beauty), a hideous Hawke, or a homely PC for Inquisitor.
I have a Warden dwarf commoner lesbian named Mal who is quite plain and butch. She has a weathered look which speaks to the hard life she has lived in Dust Town.
Modifié par The Teryn of Whatever, 10 décembre 2012 - 05:08 .
#210
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 05:12
ejoslin wrote...
esper wrote...
Sylvanpyxie wrote...
In appearance? Sure. In personality? Hells yes.Would you romance an ugly character?
Personalities of companions and love interests have been as fresh faced and pretty boyed as their appearances. If I had the option to romance a truly horrible human being, in both personality and appearance, I might actually pursue it of my own accord, if only to escape the fangirl(boy) tripe that Bioware have been trying to feed me.
Oh yeah, yeah I went there.
This is actually interesting, but I imagine that it is even harder to do, because if what is ugly in appearence is subjective, what is ugly in personality is even more so.
They Li would properly have to be an ax-crazy baby eating cannibal for all us to agree that they have an ugly personality.
I'm not even sure that would be enough. After all, a possessed terrorist who used the PC's feelings to manipulate him/her (if you're in a romance with him, he's all about the "if you love me you'll do this") is not considered too ugly to romance even after this is known.
Then there was the spy who admitted that she thought killing someone just after sex was a kindness. And she was right -- it was far kinder than the torture she inflicted on others before killing them, though she admittedly did not like torturing and killing, though she also admittedly loved the hunt.
Then again, I loved the romance of a character who described murder and power in almost orgasmic ways and described a dubious consentual encounter (some people take it as an outright rape, though that wasn't the author's intention). This was another character who thought it was a kindness to kill someone after sex, especially if the sex was really good.
No matter how ugly the actions of the love interest, if the character itself appeals to someone, they're appealling.
Edit: If they were to make ugly love interests, dwarves, old, whatever, there would be people doing them to make jokes about it (like they made ugly PCs in DAO just to FRAPS the scenes and post them on youtube or laugh about Alistair "scrogging" a dwarf). I don't think it would be a love interest that anyone took seriously unless the person was tortured. And then, well, you have a Phantom of the Opera situation which isn't so bad.
So the conclusion is: It is subjective and the only way to make it not subjective is to make so over the top cartoonish that nobody would take the character serious.
#211
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 06:29
I don't think over-the-top cartoonish would be a good thing. Having someone who has serious issues is appealing to a lot of people. Having someone who is scarred physically can be seen as sexy as well.
As far as other traits go -- there are people who find Aveline ugly and those who find her beautiful. A character like that would be both popular and mocked (I thought she was gorgeous; I loved having a strong woman as a companion). Basically, if you have an ugly LI, they need to have some pretty strong redeeming qualities, and still, they won't be nearly as popular as a good looking LI.
Modifié par ejoslin, 10 décembre 2012 - 06:29 .
#212
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 06:35
TheBlackAdder13 wrote...
I believe in inner pixel beauty.
#213
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 06:42
I wouldn't romance though if the character was like over-the-top intentionally hideous. Regardless of what some people think you have to be attracted to at least one physical aspect of a person. I mean I have some friends who are really great people with awesome personalities, but they are dudes, so I'm not attracted to them in the least. An ugly character has to have at least some femininely attractive aspect (or masculine aspect if that's your preference).
#214
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 07:06
#215
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 07:26
So no, it really wouldn't matter if I though they were ugly.
#216
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 09:25
If you think that's ugly, I don't want to look at what you considder hot.Bfler wrote...
iOnlySignIn wrote...
Mods. Glorious PC Gaming Maste Race.
Looks like a British soccer hooligan.
If I call a face ugly, then it is something like this fan-made face of Tali (ME):
#217
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 09:32
#218
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 10:35
#219
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 10:41
#220
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 10:47
#221
Posté 10 décembre 2012 - 11:00
#222
Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 01:23
Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*
#223
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 02:17
#224
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 02:31
An ugly character still has potential to have a great story to them, and fantastic interactions to boot.
#225
Posté 11 décembre 2012 - 03:14
<Back on topic> Blah blah blah, ugly is subjective, as i thought this lady looked like Gary Busey's mugshot, but my friend thought she... Blah, blah, blah.(Generic anecdote about beauty being in the eye of the beholder.)
So yeah i wouldn't mind a companion who's facial features, body shape doesn't conform to western or eastern idealizations.





Retour en haut







