160 réponses à ce sujet

[Liamv2]

Any really

[Bill Casey]

DeinonSlayer wrote...

How would a sequel account for up to, what, seven species possibly being extinct in a SINGLE PLAYTHROUGH? (Hanar, Drell, Krogan, Rachni, Quarians, Geth, Reapers)

You think you killed all of the Rachni?
Really?

The Protheans burned two hundred worlds and didn't kill the Rachni; the Krogan led a brutally thorough genocide campaign against the Rachni, and failed to wipe them out. You possibly torched the Queen on Noveria, and the Rachni still stood...

But you shoot up a cave for thirty minutes, and THAT'S the one that does it?
Really?

Modifié par Bill Casey, 09 décembre 2012 - 08:00 .

[Dragoonlordz]

None, I would place start of next game 100,000 years after the end of ME3 and during that period converge all the endings into one outcome which would be a fresh start. There will be no need for import to that new fresh game because nothing about the Reapers or Shepard will be mentioned in the entire game due to how much time has past none of what happened 100,000 years ago matters anymore. It is forgotten and has no relevence to the societies or cultures that exist after 100,000 years. Having said that I don't mind it being prequel in the next game so doesn't bother me what they do I will be okay with either sequel or prequel.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 09 décembre 2012 - 08:06 .

[dreman9999]

Destroy and/or control.

[Dr_Extrem]

Snake91 wrote...

Oh stop with that nonsense Bioware will make PREQUEL NOT SEQUEL

my guess is, that roughly 90% of the bsn community thinks, that prequels suck.

name a really good prequel to a sci fi opera.


prequels are very limited ... the story has to take place in a very controled environment ... it is limiting, because the community will know if something does not fit. .. on the other hand .. bioware does not really care about consistancy anymore.

[Iakus]

SpamBot2000 wrote...

MEHEM of course..

[SpamBot2000]

BioWare may feel that they have no choice but to make a prequel. But that's just thinking in the Walters Box. Get out of the Box, BioWare!

[Dean_the_Young]

Destroy. With the exception of the Geth (which could be written around, I suppose), the prospect of the galaxy re-connecting with new relays centuries later strikes me as not only an interesting idea for re-building the universe, but also an ideal way to show the long-term effects of Shepard's Big Decisions (which shape history) versus the Little Decisions (the effects of which fade with time).

[DeinonSlayer]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

None, I would place start of next game 100,000 years after the end of ME3 and during that period converge all the endings into one outcome which would be a fresh start. There will be no need for import to that new fresh game because nothing about the Reapers or Shepard will be mentioned in the entire game due to how much time has past none of what happened 100,000 years ago matters anymore. It is forgotten and has no relevence to the societies or cultures that exist after 100,000 years. Having said that I don't mind it being prequel in the next game so doesn't bother me what they do I will be okay with either sequel or prequel.

100,000 years won't bring back an extinct species.

[liggy002]

None, they all suck.  I'd either completely re do the ending or make the IT dream theory canon.

[Massa FX]

High EMS Destroy. The Reaper threat is over. Shepard did her job. The galaxy will never have to suffer a harvest again. The galaxy has learned a lesson about sentient beings. A lesson not to be forgotten. The united galaxy has a clean slate to build upon. A better coexistence to enjoy, while keeping their diversity and individualism. In ME3, a lot of hidden ugly secrets were exposed.

The future is not set and things can go bad... but a whole lot of good is possible too.

[Massa FX]

Bill Casey wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

How would a sequel account for up to, what, seven species possibly being extinct in a SINGLE PLAYTHROUGH? (Hanar, Drell, Krogan, Rachni, Quarians, Geth, Reapers)

You think you killed all of the Rachni?
Really?

The Protheans burned two hundred worlds and didn't kill the Rachni; the Krogan led a brutally thorough genocide campaign against the Rachni, and failed to wipe them out. You possibly torched the Queen on Noveria, and the Rachni still stood...

But you shoot up a cave for thirty minutes, and THAT'S the one that does it?
Really?

At some point in the future the relays are fixed and new relays opened. New species discovered and new conflicts. Thats where ME4 can go and do well.

[garrusfan1]

iakus wrote...

SpamBot2000 wrote...

MEHEM of course..

This actually

[garrusfan1]

Actually I expect them to do a rachni type wars thing in the future though (after ME3).where they open a relay and release a horrible new enemy

[Kataphrut94]

I wouldn't worry about it. No matter what ending, the Reapers are defeated and the galaxy is saved so they have room to just let that plot rest and start fresh.

[Dragoonlordz]

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

None, I would place start of next game 100,000 years after the end of ME3 and during that period converge all the endings into one outcome which would be a fresh start. There will be no need for import to that new fresh game because nothing about the Reapers or Shepard will be mentioned in the entire game due to how much time has past none of what happened 100,000 years ago matters anymore. It is forgotten and has no relevence to the societies or cultures that exist after 100,000 years. Having said that I don't mind it being prequel in the next game so doesn't bother me what they do I will be okay with either sequel or prequel.

100,000 years won't bring back an extinct species.

And which species would that be? Rachni you only wiped out the ones you knew of, Geth could be replaced as it is they are merely AI created by other species, another may create such within those 100,000 years. This does not include the fact that over such a time span new races will rise and be discovered, others may die out naturally. There is no reason for or against having older races still present or any lack of new races simply because were not present 100,000 years in past from logical point of view. It also does not have to take place in the galaxy present in ME 1-3. There are many more galaxies out there and over 100,000 years would be plenty of time for one or more species from out galaxy to visit/settle in theirs. Maybe Buck Rogers meets Lost in Space and have baby called ME4.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 09 décembre 2012 - 08:57 .

[AlanC9]

Calinstel wrote...
Well, following the Foundation series, refuse would be the best option to open up as many possibilites as possible.
10,000 years of Galactic dark age and once more, Man is ready to reach for the stars anew with a whole new galaxy to explore.  (new in the sense that nothing is known/remembered about the previous inhabitants.)

Man? In Refuse there isn't going to be any "man." Just a new Reaper.

[Sil]

High EMS Destroy for me.

[Diurdi]

Dr_Extrem wrote...

name a really good prequel to a sci fi opera.

Star Wars Episode I

Modifié par Diurdi, 09 décembre 2012 - 09:41 .

[Ticonderoga117]

Everything that happened after Arrival was Shepard thinking "What will happen if I sit on my behind for 6 months." Therefore, the next trilogy will do justice in dealing with the Reaper threat without any of that BS.

[Mcfly616]

AlanC9 wrote...

Calinstel wrote...
Well, following the Foundation series, refuse would be the best option to open up as many possibilites as possible.
10,000 years of Galactic dark age and once more, Man is ready to reach for the stars anew with a whole new galaxy to explore.  (new in the sense that nothing is known/remembered about the previous inhabitants.)

Man? In Refuse there isn't going to be any "man." Just a new Reaper.

well, its odd that he mentions "refuse" in Foundation. Because the option is never really explored. The protagonist is given 3 options that each resemble Control, Destroy and Synthesis.....not refuse. So.....