81 réponses à ce sujet

[FaWa]

I'll start.

Female Dwarves
Race options
Female Qunari/Kossith
More in depth companions you can talk to whenever you want. (Or at least in between missions)
Enemies not falling from the sky
A story told without plot twists solely for the purpuse of boss fights
Coercion coming back into the game
More than 4 LIs (But keep all Bisexual, I'll glady say why but not in this list)
A fourth class maybe?
Being able to spec companions into what you want. Everyone was forced into a role
Being able to give my companions whatever clothing I want 
No auto diaologue 


feel free to post yours. I'll edit this one with what you guys post so we can have a giant list. 

[Plato]

Everything Single Player is more important to me, i'd hate to see a great multiplayer with a mediocre single player campaign.

[Blackrising]

Uhm...absolutely everything?

[daaaav]

Hmmm...

I don't know what to say, it could be almost everything.

[jack253]

What is more important to me than multiplayer in DA3.
Ow I know absolutely everything not involved with multiplayer in any way

[BouncyFrag]

You could have saved time by just saying, "fix everything that was wrong in DA2."

[NUM13ER]

Pretty much everything: gameplay, classes, story, customisation, visuals, companions and player agency in general. I think I'd be extremely hard pressed to find any aspect of the single player experience that I don't feel is more important to me.

[efrgfhnm_]

Everything in single player

[BanksHector]

Great Story and Companions.
Morrigan
Having Auto Attack at release
Better ending then DA2

I guess thoses would be the biggest ones.

[Liamv2]

Blackrising wrote...

Uhm...absolutely everything?

[Fortlowe]

I enjoyed ME3 multiplayer, as well as the campaign. Looking forward to both in Dragon Age 3, if ME3 is evidence of what we can expect. The most important thing about any game or game mode is how much I enjoy it.

[labargegrrrl]

Blackrising wrote...

Uhm...absolutely everything?

seconded!

[jack253]

Fortlowe wrote...

I enjoyed ME3 multiplayer, as well as the campaign. Looking forward to both in Dragon Age 3, if ME3 is evidence of what we can expect. The most important thing about any game or game mode is how much I enjoy it.

I agree with you that ME3 multiplayer was enjoyable for a time. But it was something that fitted with the series (it's very easy to turn a shooter into a multiplayer). For DA I just don't see a multiplayer (co-op or competitive) working.

[Celene II]

More important then multiplayer in DA3?

The list would be much shorter if you asked what is less important

I would rather have MP then have the game electrically shock me every time i took damage
I would rather have MP then have game cost 120 dollars
I would rather have MP then um i think im done.

MP in da does not make sense in the slightest and no one will ever convince me that you dont skimp on SP if you include MP. You have too.

[Sable Rhapsody]

Guys, BG1 and 2 had multiplayer. It's not multiplayer as we know it now, but the very CONCEPT of multiplayer doesn't have to be anethema to an RPG.

For the most part the SP is more important to me, but if the push for MP improves the mechanics and balance of SP in the process, I won't complain. 

Modifié par Sable Rhapsody, 10 décembre 2012 - 10:01 .

[A Crusty Knight Of Colour]

Broodmother romance. That's about it.

[Inquisitor Recon]

CrustyBot wrote...
Broodmother romance. That's about it.

Broodmother, desire demon, and maybe a stone golem, anything else I'm missing?

[Celene II]

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

Guys, BG1 and 2 had multiplayer. It's not multiplayer as we know it now, but the very CONCEPT of multiplayer doesn't have to be anethema to an RPG.

For the most part the SP is more important to me, but if the push for MP improves the mechanics and balance of SP in the process, I won't complain. 

MP in the history of games has never improved single player

The only thing it does is steal resources from SP

[Sable Rhapsody]

Celene II wrote...
MP in the history of games has never improved single player

The only thing it does is steal resources from SP

Play some Baldur's Gate and see if you feel the same way 

[Imp of the Perverse]

Celene II wrote...

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

Guys, BG1 and 2 had multiplayer. It's not multiplayer as we know it now, but the very CONCEPT of multiplayer doesn't have to be anethema to an RPG.

For the most part the SP is more important to me, but if the push for MP improves the mechanics and balance of SP in the process, I won't complain. 

MP in the history of games has never improved single player

The only thing it does is steal resources from SP

Comparing gameplay in ME3 to gameplay in ME1 and ME2, I'm pretty sure the decision to include multiplayer had a positive impact. The multiplayer pretty much relies on having diverse weapons and powers, and combat that goes beyond simple cover based shooting, and it's pretty evident that all of these improved a great deal in the third game. Mobility and melee were expanded on, the weapons were made more diverse (not just the statistical variations of the same 5 guns you saw in ME1), and the introduction of the weapon weight system added a big degree of flexibility to build customization.

[Pedrak]

Everything, up to and including nice art in the manual and a cool song during the credits.

[DarkKnightHolmes]

Everything.

[Pedrak]

More effort put into the ending(s).