81 réponses à ce sujet

[Plaintiff]

Marvin_Arnold wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

But it doesn't matter, because MP is not going to drain resources from the Single Player campaign.

Still trolling talking about stuff you haven't the slightest clue of? If you knew anything about game production, you'd know that it will. And I'm not only talking manpower.

"Still"? I don't recall you.

There are people on this forum who work in gaming, and they'll tell you that multiplayer, as a separate source of revenue, gets its own resources that would not be granted otherwise. Those resources would not be given to the singleplayer campaign if multiplayer did not exist, they would simply not be given at all. As for manpower, multiplayer development has particular needs and as such requires particular developers with particular skills. Single-player campaign devs aren't just going to be shunted over to the multiplayer department en masse.

Unless you have the credentials and experience to back up your contrary opinion, I'm going to stick with the information I've already been given.

Modifié par Plaintiff, 12 décembre 2012 - 04:24 .

[lunamoondragon]

Not being open-world.
Please don't be open-world.

I know there are good open-world games
but please don't be open world

[ApprenticeALG]

I hate to be that guy, but EA literally will not publish a game without multiplayer. They have stated this much. Bioware doesn't deserve flak for this.

[Iakus]

ApprenticeALG wrote...

I hate to be that guy, but EA literally will not publish a game without multiplayer. They have stated this much. Bioware doesn't deserve flak for this.

Apparantly DA2 met whatever social networking requirements or whatever it is EA insists on.

So I say, stick with that.

[Wolfspawn]

Single Player.

[Dingo]

Single player campaign will always be more important than multiplayer for me. In my opinion multiplayer just doesn't fit with the dragon age universe, there's no point to it. But I wouldn't object to co-op which would work in the DA world.