Why was I forced to act so out of character?
#26
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 06:59
#27
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 06:59
You have no proof whatsoever that Tevos knew anything until she was informed from afar. You have no cause to blame her."But... everyone LOVES Asari." Nope. I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
And some of us believed it deserved a much stronger reprimand, but we didn't get that either. Give and take.Just because you found it
tasteless or worthy of a reprimand, doesn't mean we all did. I would
have been the person MAKING that joke.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 13 décembre 2012 - 07:00 .
#28
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 06:59
. We should have been able to chew them out. The Asari government is responsible for continuing the war, and we are just forced to sit there crying for them.Barquiel wrote...
Joker chose his time and his audience completely wrong when he made that joke. I found Shepards reaction too mild.Joy Sauce wrote...
I would have LOVED the opportunity to confront the asari councillor (them withholding prothean tech should have been a major scandal, but it was never even mentioned again).
Probably because it wasn't Tevos's/Irissa's idea to hide the beacon, and we don't meet the matriarchs who made the decision.
#29
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:00
Neither. Shepard could have started in on Tevos, Tevos severs the comm link, Shepard lets out a naughty word, goes back out into the war room and everything goes the same way from there on out. Nothing big story-wise, but it would make all the difference in the world from an RP perspective. It'd save me from having to mash the spacebar all the way through that segment, too.LinksOcarina wrote...
DeinonSlayer wrote...
I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
Here is an important question.
did the plot dictate this, or the story?
#30
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:00
They're all dead, and we cry for the world as a whole.Steelcan wrote...
. We should have been able to chew them out. The Asari government is responsible for continuing the war, and we are just forced to sit there crying for them.Barquiel wrote...
Joker chose his time and his audience completely wrong when he made that joke. I found Shepards reaction too mild.Joy Sauce wrote...
I would have LOVED the opportunity to confront the asari councillor (them withholding prothean tech should have been a major scandal, but it was never even mentioned again).
Probably because it wasn't Tevos's/Irissa's idea to hide the beacon, and we don't meet the matriarchs who made the decision.
#31
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:01
. "An artifact known only to the highest levels of my government". She's the Councilor for the entire Asari race, she knew about it, she's almost as high as the government goes.Xilizhra wrote...
You have no proof whatsoever that Tevos knew anything until she was informed from afar. You have no cause to blame her."But... everyone LOVES Asari." Nope. I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
#32
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:03
Still wanted to tell her what her government did. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her.Xilizhra wrote...
You have no proof whatsoever that Tevos knew anything until she was informed from afar. You have no cause to blame her."But... everyone LOVES Asari." Nope. I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
#33
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:03
. Why? We can slaughter the quarians and not batan eye, we doom the Krogan to extinction, we can murder the last member of a species, we can destroy an entire synthetic race all without being whiney *****. But as soon as the Asari get attacked....Xilizhra wrote...
They're all dead, and we cry for the world as a whole.Steelcan wrote...
. We should have been able to chew them out. The Asari government is responsible for continuing the war, and we are just forced to sit there crying for them.Barquiel wrote...
Joker chose his time and his audience completely wrong when he made that joke. I found Shepards reaction too mild.
Probably because it wasn't Tevos's/Irissa's idea to hide the beacon, and we don't meet the matriarchs who made the decision.
#34
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:04
She's a representative, not necessarily a decision-maker for asari society itself. Especially as she's under the scrutiny of the whole galaxy and would be a decided security risk.. "An artifact known only to the highest levels of my government". She's the Councilor for the entire Asari race, she knew about it, she's almost as high as the government goes.
Well, I would be sorry that your Shepard is a better person than you, but I find it hard to actually be so. Maybe your Shepard is a better person than I am too.Still wanted to tell her what her government did. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her.
Actually, you don't doom the krogan to extinction, they doom themselves. But it's true, many of those are out of place and clash with any sort of ability to remain actually heroic; "choice" may have gone too far there.. Why? We can slaughter the quarians and not batan eye, we doom the
Krogan to extinction, we can murder the last member of a species, we can
destroy an entire synthetic race all without being whiney *****. But as
soon as the Asari get attacked....
Modifié par Xilizhra, 13 décembre 2012 - 07:05 .
#35
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:06
DeinonSlayer wrote...
Neither. Shepard could have started in on Tevos, Tevos severs the comm link, Shepard lets out a naughty word, goes back out into the war room and everything goes the same way from there on out. Nothing big story-wise, but it would make all the difference in the world from an RP perspective. It'd save me from having to mash the spacebar all the way through that segment, too.LinksOcarina wrote...
DeinonSlayer wrote...
I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
Here is an important question.
did the plot dictate this, or the story?
If it was a plot moment, something unavoidable, its sole purpose is to move the plot forward. If it was a story decision, it would then be changed to dictate the outcome you desired.
So this was a plot moment that can't be changed because it is moving the plot forward. From a RP perspective what you, the player wants, is irrelevent. If it was a story moment then you can role-play that aspect further to a different outcome, despite it changing nothing but the context of the scene.
But since the entire arc post-thessis is essentially the Straw that breaks the camels back, its designed to be more somber in that regard.
#36
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:06
. She wouldn't be a councilor if she was a security risk. Councilor is a huge position. Very important position, she would have to be a high level member of the government to get the job.Xilizhra wrote...
She's a representative, not necessarily a decision-maker for asari society itself. Especially as she's under the scrutiny of the whole galaxy and would be a decided security risk.. "An artifact known only to the highest levels of my government". She's the Councilor for the entire Asari race, she knew about it, she's almost as high as the government goes.
.
#37
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:06
#38
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:07
. The Krogan didn't trick themselves into thinking they were saved.Xilizhra wrote...
Actually, you don't doom the krogan to extinction, they doom themselves. But it's true, many of those are out of place and clash with any sort of ability to remain actually heroic; "choice" may have gone too far there.. Why? We can slaughter the quarians and not batan eye, we doom the
Krogan to extinction, we can murder the last member of a species, we can
destroy an entire synthetic race all without being whiney *****. But as
soon as the Asari get attacked....
#39
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:08
#40
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:10
Draining Dragon wrote...
The biggest example is Joker's comment after Thessia. I actually found it very funny, and I wanted to say so. Well, Bioware says "Nope, you need to be a hardass."
Yeah, I really wish there was that option.
Something like, "Too true. We should go".
#41
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:10
#42
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:12
#43
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:12
. Show me. I only recall her saying that the beacon was known to only the highest levels of Asari government, the councilor is in the highest levels f Asari governmentBarquiel wrote...
Tevos/Irissa contact Shepard as soon as the matriarchs on Thessia have informed them about the existence of the beacon. That's explicitly stated in the game. Blaming them would be as useful as blaming Liara, Samara or some random asari on the citadel.
#44
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:12
AresKeith wrote...
The thing about me is, I wanted to feel for Thessia but I couldn't because the mission was too short to feel anything.
If Bioware added more missions to it like Tuchanka and Rannoch, and/or made it a Hub then I would feel something for Thessia
Or they could have made another option that says "Not now Joker"
#45
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:13
I don't see how this qualifies. Killing Kai Leng on the Citadel by pulling up when he lands on the hood of the car and letting him get smeared by a passing bridge would have had a plot effect. Whether Shepard apologizes to or antagonizes Tevos doesn't. That's not plot. It's characterization.LinksOcarina wrote...
If it was a plot moment, something unavoidable, its sole purpose is to move the plot forward. If it was a story decision, it would then be changed to dictate the outcome you desired.
So this was a plot moment that can't be changed because it is moving the plot forward. From a RP perspective what you, the player wants, is irrelevent. If it was a story moment then you can role-play that aspect further to a different outcome, despite it changing nothing but the context of the scene.
But since the entire arc post-thessis is essentially the Straw that breaks the camels back, its designed to be more somber in that regard.
You're left in the same situation regardless of what Shepard says. Cerberus has the VI, Shepard needs it back. That simple. Besides, if Shepard can immediately go and tell Liara that she isn't responsible for any of the loss on Thessia, why is Shepard required to? ESPECIALLY a Shepard who may have instigated MULTIPLE GENOCIDES by this point?
#46
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:16
Meh. ME3 was positively awful when it comes to the roleplaying breadth it gives you. No defense of Shepard's reaction could negate or justify that. ME games never gave you as much breadth as you'd like -- the series is littered with moments and lines that I hated but could not avoid -- but in ME3 there is virtually no room for nuance. I am fortunate in that Shepard rarely said anything in ME3 that didn't sit well with me; Shepard and me were on the same relative page with the Joker scene. Others weren't so lucky.DeinonSlayer wrote...
I have a huge problem with the above. Mac felt that way. I, and by extension Shepard, shouldn't. It drives a wedge between player and character in a role-playing game. More to the point, it's quite possibly hypocritical on Shepard's part. By this point in the narrative, Shepard may have quite intentionally doomed the Krogan, Rachni and Geth. The Quarians can die as a direct consequence of Shepard's actions (neglecting to mention the upload and that they'll only react defensively), and Shepard shrugs it off, blaming them for it. Yet this Shepard gets broken up about, this Shepard claims responsibility for?Nightwriter wrote...
It was a tasteless joke that was supposed to be a tasteless joke. Shepard felt personally accountable for Thessia and snapped when he heard Joker saying the asari might not have gotten near genocided if they hadn't been such skanks. Reaction was understandable.
This is the only genocide in the narrative that Shepard doesn't instigate!
"But... everyone LOVES Asari." Nope. I for one wanted to chew out Tevos. I sure as hell wouldn't be apologizing to her. The battle for Earth, and all casualties incurred therein, would never have happened if the Asari government hadn't sat on this beacon so long for their own selfish purposes. It's made all the worse because they were passing judgment on other races for so long, forbidding the hoarding of Prothean artifacts when that's exactly what they were doing.
[/rant]
In the case of Thessia, for whatever reason I am supposed to believe the asari have been made nigh extinct and their homeworld is lost. Not sure why, but there it is. This would make for the first species extinction Shepard has been involved in. Confused as I was about the technicals of this supposed extinction, I did appreciate the way it was presented as something of a breaking point for Shepard. Shades of the locker scene. Seemed like that Joker convo was supposed to convey the seriousness of the loss, the gravity of the situation, and Shepard's strain. I believe it's the same conversation where Joker says your suit readings show you're under more pressure than you were in the Skyllian Blitz (or whatever background you picked). I liked it for those reasons.
#47
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:19
DeinonSlayer wrote...
I don't see how this qualifies. Killing Kai Leng on the Citadel by pulling up when he lands on the hood of the car and letting him get smeared by a passing bridge would have had a plot effect. Whether Shepard apologizes to or antagonizes Tevos doesn't. That's not plot. It's characterization.LinksOcarina wrote...
If it was a plot moment, something unavoidable, its sole purpose is to move the plot forward. If it was a story decision, it would then be changed to dictate the outcome you desired.
So this was a plot moment that can't be changed because it is moving the plot forward. From a RP perspective what you, the player wants, is irrelevent. If it was a story moment then you can role-play that aspect further to a different outcome, despite it changing nothing but the context of the scene.
But since the entire arc post-thessis is essentially the Straw that breaks the camels back, its designed to be more somber in that regard.
You're left in the same situation regardless of what Shepard says. Cerberus has the VI, Shepard needs it back. That simple. Besides, if Shepard can immediately go and tell Liara that she isn't responsible for any of the loss on Thessia, why is Shepard required to? ESPECIALLY a Shepard who may have instigated MULTIPLE GENOCIDES by this point?
Who else is going to calm Liara?
The reason this is a plot moment is because its guiding the actions of the plot for a desired outcome, namely to show Shepard at the lowest point. Antagonizing Tevos doesn't do that, Tevos is a minor character, antagonizing Joker on the other hand can do that, or completely ignoring Liara in her time of need. I found the paragon interrupt in that moment to be more selfish and mission focused, since all you do is remind her of what needs to be done, and not give her a moment to herself, as an example.
Point is, the plot at this point is to show Shepard at the lowest. If all of a sudden Shepard antagonizes someone he tried to help, especially after such a loss, it would lose a lot of that effect that was being conveyed. Instead it would be steeling resolve right after a major loss with little context other than fueling anger. Empathy over rage, basically. So the story in-between is how you react to everyone else, namely Joker, Javik and Liara, where you can control that to some extant.
Modifié par LinksOcarina, 13 décembre 2012 - 07:21 .
#48
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:24
Why was I forced to act so out of character?
Because Mac said so.
#49
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:24
DeinonSlayer wrote...
This is the only genocide in the narrative that Shepard doesn't instigate!
For some strange reason, this made me laugh. Out loud, even.
#50
Posté 13 décembre 2012 - 07:26
Draining Dragon wrote...
The biggest example is Joker's comment after Thessia. I actually found it very funny, and I wanted to say so. Well, Bioware says "Nope, you need to be a hardass."
Yeah, this one's pretty bad. I had a couple of bad ones in the previous games too, but this one sticks out becausethe joke's pretyt good, and Shepard's never been forced to dislike one of Joker's gags before.
OTOH, this one is awfully crass.
I think I would have been OK with something like a dejected "Nice try, Jeff;" which I think would have been OK for the post-Thessia dramatic intent.
Modifié par AlanC9, 13 décembre 2012 - 07:29 .





Retour en haut







