35 réponses à ce sujet

[astreqwerty]

[Adugan]

[cephasjames]

hmmm.

[thats1evildude]

Fascinating debate, truly.

[LinksOcarina]

I never liked new game + stuff. It seems like a conceit in some rpgs just to add challenge and replayability to a title without losing levels or items.

No need for it really.

[DarkKnightHolmes]

No.

The only reason ME series need a NG+ is because how quick the game takes to finish compare to the Dragon Age series.

[Vandicus]

I have to agree with Adugan here.

[Charles Rosemberg]

So that's the meaning of life! and the secret for immortality!

[Todd23]

DarkKnightHolmes wrote...

No.

The only reason ME series need a NG+ is because how quick the game takes to finish compare to the Dragon Age series.

I don't think even they should have had it.

[Sylvanpyxie]

The only reason ME series need a NG+ is because how quick the game takes to finish compare to the Dragon Age series.

Really? I always thought Mass Effect needed a NG+ because it liked to lock the player out of certain dialogue choices, dependent on an alignment bar, and you had to do at least 2 run-throughs in order to fully unlock all the dialogue options in order to actually respond to conversations the way you originally intended.

But apparently not.. Learn something new every day.

Modifié par Sylvanpyxie, 14 décembre 2012 - 11:17 .

[astreqwerty]

I still stand by my opening statement

[LPPrince]

Wow, a very anti-NG+ thread here.

Personally I'm for its inclusion. Its completely optional. If someone doesn't want to use that character again with all their weapons and armor etc etc etc, they don't have to.

Those of us who like to can continue to do so with NG+.

I don't see why it should be purposefully EXCLUDED.

[Vandicus]

Well, being serious, I actually like NG+.

[ManOfSteel]

I'm fully in support of New Game Plus. I love starting the game over with all my equipment and experience. NG+ should not forced upon you, but the option should be there for those that want to take advantage of it. If you don't like it, simply don't use it.

LPPrince wrote...

Wow, a very anti-NG+ thread here.

Personally I'm for its inclusion. Its completely optional. If someone doesn't want to use that character again with all their weapons and armor etc etc etc, they don't have to.

Those of us who like to can continue to do so with NG+.

I don't see why it should be purposefully EXCLUDED.

This. I never understood the attitude that calls for it's exclusion. It's never force upon the player, and it adds replayability for those that like it.

Modifié par DoomHK, 14 décembre 2012 - 11:24 .

[Sylvanpyxie]

Wow, a very anti-NG+ thread here.

I'm not against NG+ itself, so much as being against developer stupidity that locks out major characterization options only accessible via NG+.

As a general rule - As long as I remain unaffected I'm fine with it.

[Xephyr829]

I support the option of NG+.

I've always liked it, so I hope they include it.

[HTTP 404]

DarkKnightHolmes wrote...

No.

The only reason ME series need a NG+ is because how quick the game takes to finish compare to the Dragon Age series.

its completely optional....but it bugs you? huh, go figure.  You can't please everyone.

[Fast Jimmy]

The best version of NG+ ever done was Crono Trigger.

Not only did it let you keep all levels and non-plot specific equipment, but you got the option to skip to the end boss anytime you wanted to, and got different endings based on when you defeated him.

BALLER.

Given that time travel is not possible (THAT WE KNOW OF!!!) in the DA setting, I don't think this would be as doable. But hey, why not? If I did a second replay of DA2, I'll likely do one of DA3 when I get around to playing it. Might as well be a NG+ unless there are some really unique contributions to the backgrounds that would warrant a fresh start every time.

[JCAP]

LPPrince wrote...

Wow, a very anti-NG+ thread here.

Personally I'm for its inclusion. Its completely optional. If someone doesn't want to use that character again with all their weapons and armor etc etc etc, they don't have to.

Those of us who like to can continue to do so with NG+.

I don't see why it should be purposefully EXCLUDED.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^

[Adugan]

astreqwerty wrote...

I still stand by my opening statement

I stand by mine even more

[Wulfram]

I'd rather have the option to start at Level 10 or so on replays, than NG+

[Fast Jimmy]

Wulfram wrote...

I'd rather have the option to start at Level 10 or so on replays, than NG+

I still think that would be a NG+ scenario, just maybe not a standard one.

After all... you are starting a New Game. And your character is getting a serious bonus (or +, if you will) upon starting it, simply because you have beaten it before...?

[Wulfram]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

I still think that would be a NG+ scenario, just maybe not a standard one.

After all... you are starting a New Game. And your character is getting a serious bonus (or +, if you will) upon starting it, simply because you have beaten it before...?

Maybe.  edit:  I personally wouldn't consider it NG+ because I'd want to be able to use a different character.

But the lowest levels with only a couple of talents are basically dumbed down combat to make it easier for newbies to get the hang of things.  There's no good reason to inflict that on experienced players.  But starting out right at the top feels wrong to me, too.

Modifié par Wulfram, 14 décembre 2012 - 11:57 .

[astreqwerty]

I totally support NG+....after playing the dlcs both early in the game and after I beat it the difference in the complexity of the battles was enormous.Id like to have that in the rest of the game and frankly it is very easy to implement.After all its a game,and I hate having just perfected my favourite character in order to abandon him right after the final boss.Also Id like there to be a harder difficulty level unlocked for NG+