168 réponses à ce sujet

[Nonlethal Overkill]

Pretty much for variety. As much as I love the top tier guns, I can't stand using just one or two guns on every character. Gotta mix it up sometimes.

[Daihannya]

I use my harrier X to get matches done quickly.

My Valkryie is only at 3, and that gun has more variety in weapons mods. I.E. I can use an omniblade, and extended barrel. The harrier requires the ammo mod, so only one slot to play with.

I honestly have enjoyed running the Valkryie on the krentinel, Turrians, and the destroyer. It's different and I don't have to keep running to ammo boxes.

[3rd-apex]

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

[Jay_Hoxtatron]

3rd-apex wrote...

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

And if the people using Harriers/PPRs are good at landing headshots? 

That's why the Valkyrie is not as good as the Typhoon/PPR/Harrier.

[DeadeyeCYclops]

Don't have a harrier X i think mines still @ lvl 2 or 3 and i NEVER use it. The gun just screams cheap about like geth stunlock

[Stardusk]

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

3rd-apex wrote...

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

And if the people using Harriers/PPRs are good at landing headshots? 

That's why the Valkyrie is not as good as the Typhoon/PPR/Harrier.

Honestly, you don't count Jay.

[Jay_Hoxtatron]

Stardusk wrote...

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

3rd-apex wrote...

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

And if the people using Harriers/PPRs are good at landing headshots? 

That's why the Valkyrie is not as good as the Typhoon/PPR/Harrier.

Honestly, you don't count Jay.

My point still stands. At same skill level, the player taking a Harrier/Typhoon/PPR will do better with those ARs than with a Valkyrie.

Modifié par Jay_Hoxtatron, 15 décembre 2012 - 08:10 .

[Tybo]

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

3rd-apex wrote...

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

And if the people using Harriers/PPRs are good at landing headshots? 

That's why the Valkyrie is not as good as the Typhoon/PPR/Harrier.

Honestly, you don't count Jay.

My point still stands. At same skill level, the player taking a Harrier/Typhoon/PPR will do better than with those ARs than with a Valkyrie.

Yeah, I also don't see how Jay's cyborg implants have anything to do with this.  If you can headshot with a valkyrie, you can headshot with a Harrier/Typhoon/PPR (or probably even a Saber) and do better.

[hostaman]

I have a Valkyrie IV and a Harrier I

Never touch the Valkyrie.

[Stardusk]

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

3rd-apex wrote...

I will out score people that use Harriers with a vindicator because I am really good at landing consistent head shots with burst weapons. Valkyrie would win every time with me.

And if the people using Harriers/PPRs are good at landing headshots? 

That's why the Valkyrie is not as good as the Typhoon/PPR/Harrier.

Honestly, you don't count Jay.

My point still stands. At same skill level, the player taking a Harrier/Typhoon/PPR will do better than with those ARs than with a Valkyrie.

I hate the Valkyrie. I would take the PPR, Harrier and Typhoon (in that order) over it any day, but then again I am just a human being.

[DarklighterFreak]

For teh lulz, maybe, but the HX is just too good LOL.

[Vilyn117]

I would use both, i enjoy variety.

[cowwy]

Well considering the fact that I have a Valkyrie V and no Harrier still? Yeah I'm going to keep using the Valkyrie.

[aliceshell]

Love my Harrier，but get bored of it. Valkryie is ok, but it's semi-auto, I would rather use Collector Rifle instead.

[mrcanada]

Lord_Sirian wrote...

iOnlySignIn wrote...

mrcanada wrote...

iOnlySignIn wrote...

Show me a video of you using the Saber then. Without Marksman. I'm happy to learn.

I don't have a video capturing card, but I have it at X and use it juuuuusssttttt fine and none of my Marksmen kits utilize it.

How exactly do you use it for it to be juuuuusssttttt fine?

 

I'm sure he scores 150k in U/U/G PUG's with it. 

How'd you know?

[TheGreatDayne]

If I had Harrier X, I'd still use the Valkyrie.... To be honest, I just don't like the Harrier... even in single player... Adas is more fun... I don't know! It feels boring, to me! I'm biased with the Valkyrie, though, since the name reminds me of that one episode of Courage the Cowardly Dog... Oh, and the Valkyrie is very accurate for a burst shot weapon.

[Finchtastic]

I'd honestly like to know why they released this crap weapon? I feel like it is just another way to keep me from getting the decent weapons at X.

[darkpassenger2342]

i refuse to use and judge this gun until its @ at least 6, i got the 2 this past weekend..
then again, ive never expected my URs to be good for gold before level 4-5, i dont expect them to be good before that.
i suppose since i have crap expectations for the gun i dont have anything to be let down about.

Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 16 décembre 2012 - 06:19 .

[Stardusk]

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

i refuse to use and judge this gun until its @ at least 6, i got the 2 this past weekend..
then again, ive never expected my URs to be good for gold before level 4-5, i dont expect them to be good before that.
i suppose since i have crap expectations for the gun i dont have anything to be let down about.

The Hurricane is quite good even at I.

I had expected the Valkyrie to be in its ranks but you might as well take the Mattock over it.

[Rebel_Raven]

Yes, so much yes, I'd use the valkyrie over the harrier.
Harrier is effing torture with it's crappy ammo capacity, and questionable accuracy beyond a certain range at full auto.
Nothing really helps it's ammo. What's gear gunna do? Give you maybe one more clip you'll burn through almost instantly in any real combat?

The torture of it's assault rifle challenge was enough.

I'd rather use pretty much any other AR in the game over it. I don't care how fast the harrier kills if I can't leave an effing ammo box with any confidence I'll have to run straight to another ammo box.

But that's not to say the other ARs don't need any help. They do. It's just that the Harrier gets on my nerves, and that's personal preferrence.

[Mailak]

I would stay with my Mattock over both of them for the lower weight but similar damage per shot.

tyhw wrote...
To use the Valkyrie over the Harrier is like using the Mattock over the Harrier.  You can do okay with it, but it is very clearly the inferior option.

 
So when I go into a match with people that have the Harrier X and finish with twice their score and only 1 or 0 deaths that is showing my Mattock as the inferior option?

Modifié par Mailak, 16 décembre 2012 - 06:55 .

[LeandroBraz]

Even if I had Harrier X and Valkyrie I, I would still use the Valkyrie. They play different, both are effective, both are fun to play with, the real question is, why I wouldn't play with both?

[Cyonan]

I have a Harrier X and I've used the Valkyrie over it.

Though I also took my Vindicator into Gold.

Why? Variety.

It's the spice of life.

[Invader Nemesis]

Harrier X > Valkyrie

But...I prefer Hurricane > everything else lol