Eurypterid wrote...
As for RtO: why would you assume it is going to have any bearing on what happens with the expansion? Keep in mind that there are different teams working on the DLC and expansion. As well, RtO isn't the first DLC. Warden's Keep was the first official for-purchase DLC, and that was delivered relatively smoothly, was it not? A problem with RtO doesn't necessarily indicate future problems with any DLC or expansions.
We have three points of data: Shale, Warden's Keep and RtO. From my recollection (admittedly not perfect!) Shale was intended to be part of the original game... but was split off into DLC when it was realized that Shale couldn't be completed in time for the game's release. The PC/360 delay covered the Shale delay up. So that's one point of data that's not roses and sunshine.
Point two is Warden's Keep. There was a blue post or interview lamenting that it was initially built to become more than it is after the events of the DLC, however due to something that the blue poster or interviewee didn't want to discuss, much had to be left out. Point two is not roses and sunshine.
Point three is RtO. Blowing the holiday deadline was a terrible bummer. Blowing the second dateline... ugh. Nothing more needs to be said. It is not roses and sunshine.
Point four? Awakenings. On 03-16-10. Will it be delayed? If you look at the data you can draw your own conclusion. You can be smug and snarky and dim, expecting the next one to be delayed as well, or you can expect that BioWare has learned a little more each time and will be better because of their past mistakes.
Anyways, life isn't roses and sunshine. **** happens.
There. I even kept my Mashadar-like hatred of Sony and bitter, steeple-fingered suspicions of why RtO is being delayed from peeking into this post at--- Ooops, ****.