54 réponses à ce sujet

[Cashmoney007]

 
The last dlc that I got was From Ashes and haven't really found a new one that I have been that interested in.  

[Applepie_Svk]

over 9000...

[serialkicker]

I hope more then ME2

[SpamBot2000]

At least one that fixes it.

[daniel_schold]

3 more: one that provides more info and background on citadel. the other one expanding priority: earth, making it some 4-5 hours longer with missions in different locations on earth. the third should be about palaven, as it seems alot of ppl wants to see it.

[Argolas]

As many as possible. It us up to me how many of them I buy anyway, so I have no reason not to want them to make many.

[Lawrence0294]

As much as needed until they do something for the ME2 squadmates.

[George Costanza]

None really, unless they're going to sort some of the issues out. The DLC now is pretty pointless. It's not "must-have". Omega professed to be the biggest and best of them all. It was a couple of hours of shooting and a bit of irrelevant story in a mission that makes less than no sense from a narrative standpoint placed in the middle of the main game.

I probably won't buy any more DLC. Ashes was worth it for the extra character, but even still, it was shocking that it wasn't in the shipped product. Leviathan tried to make sense of the Catalyst, and was interesting, but actually raised more issues than it fixed, I think. And Omega feels completely pointless.

It's the problem with DLC now. What can they do to make it feel important? It has to take place mid-game because of the silly ending, and so giving us war assets as a reward holds no weight and gives us no urgency.

The only DLC I'd be interested in now is a post-ending one. Finding Shepard or something. That I would buy. Another irrelevant mission that Shepard takes on during the middle of a galactic invasion? Naaah.

[Caihn]

I'm not interested in more DLC unless it adds more content for the ME2 characters (especially Miranda).

[DirtySHISN0]

Argolas wrote...

As many as possible. It us up to me how many of them I buy anyway, so I have no reason not to want them to make many.

[chidingewe8036]

George Costanza wrote...

None really, unless they're going to sort some of the issues out. The DLC now is pretty pointless. It's not "must-have". Omega professed to be the biggest and best of them all. It was a couple of hours of shooting and a bit of irrelevant story in a mission that makes less than no sense from a narrative standpoint placed in the middle of the main game.

I probably won't buy any more DLC. Ashes was worth it for the extra character, but even still, it was shocking that it wasn't in the shipped product. Leviathan tried to make sense of the Catalyst, and was interesting, but actually raised more issues than it fixed, I think. And Omega feels completely pointless.

It's the problem with DLC now. What can they do to make it feel important? It has to take place mid-game because of the silly ending, and so giving us war assets as a reward holds no weight and gives us no urgency.

The only DLC I'd be interested in now is a post-ending one. Finding Shepard or something. That I would buy. Another irrelevant mission that Shepard takes on during the middle of a galactic invasion? Naaah.

Bingo even tho I personally loved Omega I think I dislike all the dlc equally as well..........ME3 just felt rushed out the door at the end of the day.

[George Costanza]

I thought Omega was dire, but then I've never cared about the combat so much in Mass Effect. It's the story that I care about, and Omega has little reason to exist, story-wise.

[JasonShepard]

I'm hoping for a few more. Leviathan was awesome, although Omega was disappointing. I'm hoping for something that returns the focus to the Reapers. If it involves Harbinger, I'll be over the moon. If it involves Shepard blowing up a Sovereign class Reaper, I'll be over the moon (probably not Harbinger, since they need him intact for the ending).
And other than that, I'd be interested in a DLC that explores the origin of the Crucible. Or at the very least hints at it. Oh, and a War Assets cinematic package would be great, but I think it would be a hard sell for Bioware to convince EA.

[jstme]

I would rather to have one expensive DLC that is rich in content (and maybe gives a squad member or a hub or even fixes the endings - hey i am entitled to dreaming!) then a bunch of pale pewpew junk DLCs.

[JasonShepard]

jstme wrote...

I would rather to have one expensive DLC that is rich in content (and maybe gives a squad member or a hub or even fixes the endings - hey i am entitled to dreaming!) then a bunch of pale pewpew junk DLCs.

Agreed - an expansion pack ala Awakening would allow them to get past the 2GB limit imposed by Xbox Live (which in my opinion is one of the things to blame for how Omega turned out). I wouldn't be looking for a new squadmate, but I wouldn't mind one. However, a new, rich, long plotline? Count me in.

Modifié par JasonShepard, 18 décembre 2012 - 12:35 .

[Linkenski]

Personally i'm interested to see what the next SP DLC contains, but if it's more of the same stuff like Omega, then i'd prefer if the next or last DLC would do something to improve the entire game.

There's a game called The Witcher, and it had a pretty stupid inventory system, aswell as its combat system, but it was a very great game, so a year after its release the developers actually released a patch called "the enhanced edition" that changed the inventory, and gave the player an almost completely new way to do combat, with different controls and camera.

That's why i kind of hope that Bioware will release a DLC that either improves the quest log, or introduces more dialogue options. It's okay that there's only one neutral choice in the entire game, but i feel like there should be a dialogue wheel instead of shepard automatically giving his opinion in some scenes.

There are just these moments where for example in a conversation with Anderson:

Anderson: "Well if you aren't sight for sore eyes!"
Shepard (AUTO): "you too sir"

I mean wouldn't it be great to have a dialogue wheel here with paraphrases like
  ___
/       Happy to see you too.
O
\\___ Indeed i am!

I think half of those hologram scenes after missions are like cutscenes, with pure autodialogue, and that just doesn't have it's place in a Mass Effect game.

Autodialogue is really alienating to the player, if you're coming directly from ME2 after beating it.

Modifié par Linkenski, 18 décembre 2012 - 12:36 .

[millsenberry]

i'll buy as many as they spit out. the longer i can stretch out my femshep's story, the better i'll feel for a highly ambiguous breath scene that in no way gave me the closure i needed. *le sigh*

Modifié par millsenberry, 18 décembre 2012 - 12:36 .

[chidingewe8036]

all the dlc for ME3 has been kinda lame to be honest when I think about it, really nothing to look forward to anymore. I don't think Bioware really gives a crap anymore either I mean they hyped Leviathan alot more than they hyped Omega. Omega was the prime example of what ME3 as a whole was............half arsed.

[Stalker]

If the quality follows the current trend (From Ashes>Leviathan>Omega)... none.

[Omanisat]

I didn't want the last three.... so, zero?

[Jere85]

42

[crimzontearz]

none unless they expand on the breath scene

[Veganterror]

Quality, not quantity.

[GreyLycanTrope]

I just want one very specific DLC but it's not gonna happen.