Modifié par M25105, 21 décembre 2012 - 05:20 .
Modifié par Skelter192, 21 décembre 2012 - 05:32 .
Skelter192 wrote...
The developers never wanted multiplayer just so you know but they were forced by the publishers to include it. The online is pretty bad.
Splinter Cell 108 wrote...
I bought it for full price and I was satisfied by it, in fact Spec Ops: The Line and Max Payne 3 are probably the best two games I played this year. Funny how those two games are both shooters.
M25105 wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
The developers never wanted multiplayer just so you know but they were forced by the publishers to include it. The online is pretty bad.
So their vision was to create this short singleplayer game and then charge full price for something you can complete in 5 hours? Wow...
TobiTobsen wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
The developers never wanted multiplayer just so you know but they were forced by the publishers to include it. The online is pretty bad.
So their vision was to create this short singleplayer game and then charge full price for something you can complete in 5 hours? Wow...
Sounds like the usual length of shooter game these days.
It took me seven hours to finish the storyline and I was rather pleased with the game thanks to is awesome story.
M25105 wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
The developers never wanted multiplayer just so you know but they were forced by the publishers to include it. The online is pretty bad.
So their vision was to create this short singleplayer game and then charge full price for something you can complete in 5 hours? Wow...
legion999 wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
The developers never wanted multiplayer just so you know but they were forced by the publishers to include it. The online is pretty bad.
So their vision was to create this short singleplayer game and then charge full price for something you can complete in 5 hours? Wow...
No it was to create a longer single player with no multiplayer. And it took me seven hours to beat.
M25105 wrote...
legion999 wrote...
No it was to create a longer single player with no multiplayer. And it took me seven hours to beat.
Even 7 hours is not worth the full price. And I don't see much of a replay value in it either, no killscore or stats and you don't feel like bad ass. Most of time all I thought was, "Yeah yeah, shut up and let's get to killing".
M25105 wrote...
Splinter Cell 108 wrote...
I bought it for full price and I was satisfied by it, in fact Spec Ops: The Line and Max Payne 3 are probably the best two games I played this year. Funny how those two games are both shooters.
So you're big into stories in games?
legion999 wrote...
M25105 wrote...
legion999 wrote...
No it was to create a longer single player with no multiplayer. And it took me seven hours to beat.
Even 7 hours is not worth the full price. And I don't see much of a replay value in it either, no killscore or stats and you don't feel like bad ass. Most of time all I thought was, "Yeah yeah, shut up and let's get to killing".
The point of the game--- *
Your head--- o
Skelter192 wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Splinter Cell 108 wrote...
I bought it for full price and I was satisfied by it, in fact Spec Ops: The Line and Max Payne 3 are probably the best two games I played this year. Funny how those two games are both shooters.
So you're big into stories in games?
Wait what...is that a serious question? You do realize what forum you're on?
xkg wrote...
Before you buy the next game go and check the average playtrough time for it :
http://howlongtobeat.com/gamelist.php
Very useful site, can save you a lot of disappointments in the future.
For example:
Spec Ops: The line
Average 6h 11m
M25105 wrote...
5 hours gameplay in the singleplayer lol. Sometimes I think the game developers forget that the story is there to enhance the game, not to take over. I'm going to try multiplayer a bit, but I'm not that impressed, hell Mass Effect 3 had a better cover system. Did I have fun? Yeah, somewhat, except for the long loading times that was very very annoying.
So question to those that bought this game for full price when it just came out, are you guys happy?
Edit: I understood that the story would be heavy when I bought this (and thank God you can skip it), but five hours in the singleplayer is laughable.
Modifié par Naughty Bear, 21 décembre 2012 - 06:45 .
Naughty Bear wrote...
The campaign don't.
But they focus on blowing up other people online more.
M25105 wrote...
Point of what? That war is hell? That people are bad? Am I suppose to be moved or be enlightened by some video game character making tough choices? The game was too short, the controls could've been better, too linear and the loading times sucked. I don't see the justification for paying full price especially after finding out that they didn't even intend multiplayer with it.
M25105 wrote...
Naughty Bear wrote...
The campaign don't.
But they focus on blowing up other people online more.
Like I said before, people don't buy COD cause of the singleplayer campaign.
With this game all I heard was about how great the singleplayer was (well the story) and not one word mentioned about MP, hell I didn't even think it had any. Then I find out that it's tagged on (and more search on the net reveals that's barely played). I just can't see how they justify selling that game at full price 49,99 euros (when it was launched) when it's so freaking short. ME had stories too, but it had a long playtime and high replay value (ignoring the crappy ending for ME 3).
Modifié par Naughty Bear, 21 décembre 2012 - 07:04 .
Naughty Bear wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Naughty Bear wrote...
The campaign don't.
But they focus on blowing up other people online more.
Like I said before, people don't buy COD cause of the singleplayer campaign.
With this game all I heard was about how great the singleplayer was (well the story) and not one word mentioned about MP, hell I didn't even think it had any. Then I find out that it's tagged on (and more search on the net reveals that's barely played). I just can't see how they justify selling that game at full price 49,99 euros (when it was launched) when it's so freaking short. ME had stories too, but it had a long playtime and high replay value (ignoring the crappy ending for ME 3).
Like I said, go play CoD multiplayer.
Naughty Bear wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Naughty Bear wrote...
The campaign don't.
But they focus on blowing up other people online more.
Like I said before, people don't buy COD cause of the singleplayer campaign.
With this game all I heard was about how great the singleplayer was (well the story) and not one word mentioned about MP, hell I didn't even think it had any. Then I find out that it's tagged on (and more search on the net reveals that's barely played). I just can't see how they justify selling that game at full price 49,99 euros (when it was launched) when it's so freaking short. ME had stories too, but it had a long playtime and high replay value (ignoring the crappy ending for ME 3).
Like I said, go play CoD multiplayer.
The Purpose of Spec Ops: The Line is to show that war is not 'cool', 'badass' or 'awesome'. Multiplayer was tagged on and completely destroys the message the campaign was trying to spread.
It is a very heavy story game. You should not of brought it if you knew it was going to be heavily story based.
Retour en haut