765 réponses à ce sujet

[kaileena_sands]

Stardusk wrote...

kaileena_sands wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

No, not hate but women have always (generally speaking) viewed men as utilities and providers. Whereas men love women (generally speaking), women love what men can give them or do for them and the minute he stops giving it to them they cease to 'love him' or in other words:

... I am speechless.

I am not sure why. Perhaps I should qualify the statement.I do not exclusively mean money. I am still puzzled as to why you are speechless.

I would explain to you but at this point, I think that either you're:

A. Pulling off the most epic troll of all times.

B. Terribly damaged in some way. Or had a terrible luck with the women in your life. Don't you really realise that you basically discarded the notion that women can actually experience romantic love?

[Stardusk]

Nissun wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

And we follow predictable mating patterns just as all other animals do. We have large brains, sure but reproduction and mating game are based on the same principles as 20,000 years ago.

Like I said, you must be such a cool guy to hang out with.

Oh, I am. I can assure you. 

[Stardusk]

kaileena_sands wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

kaileena_sands wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

No, not hate but women have always (generally speaking) viewed men as utilities and providers. Whereas men love women (generally speaking), women love what men can give them or do for them and the minute he stops giving it to them they cease to 'love him' or in other words:

... I am speechless.

I am not sure why. Perhaps I should qualify the statement.I do not exclusively mean money. I am still puzzled as to why you are speechless.

I would explain to you but at this point, I think that either you're:

A. Pulling off the most epic troll of all times.

B. Terribly damaged in some way. Or had a terrible luck with the women in your life. Don't you really realise that you basically discarded the notion that women can actually experience romantic love?

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

[xBUMMx]

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

[DevilBeast]

parico wrote...

wow Great job moderators this train wreck should have been locked down several pages ago

They are too busy in the story forum, I guess.

But you are right; this should have been stopped many pages ago (and certaintly before my brain implodes)

So, will anyone else report this thread, or should I??

[DevilBeast]

Stardusk wrote...

Nissun wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

And we follow predictable mating patterns just as all other animals do. We have large brains, sure but reproduction and mating game are based on the same principles as 20,000 years ago.

Like I said, you must be such a cool guy to hang out with.

Oh, I am. I can assure you. 

At least you are able to be sarcastic.

[JAZZ_LEG3ND]

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

Well someone had to say it.

[Ashen One]

Stardusk wrote...

Ashen Earth wrote...

parico wrote...

wow Great job moderators this train wreck should have been locked down several pages ago

I sometimes think ninja stan intentionally leaves these threads open all day because he finds them funny.

Ashen, I know we used to argue about Infiltrators and Sniper Rifles but since hearing your dry, sardonic voice and watching your threads...I think I love you in a brotherly fashion.

This is slightly disturbing.

[xBUMMx]

Stardusk wrote....

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

There are so many examples of why that is just straight up bull****.

[Aytanay]

I'm a girl, I look around often but don't post much.

[Eriseley]

So...Christmas and bacon.

[megabeast37215]

Ashen Earth wrote...

This is slightly disturbing.

This has got to be the most hilarious day on BSN ever... even rivaling the Krysae/TC nerf days.

[kaileena_sands]

JAZZ_LEG3ND wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

Well someone had to say it.

Theory v 2.0: Stardusk is actually a heretic geth unintentionally infiltrating human society to observe us before the Reapers come and destroy us. He is trying his best to understand humanity, but a faulty Reaper piece of code has stuck him in an infinite loop of animosity towards women.

xBUMMx wrote...

Stardusk wrote....

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

There are so many examples of why that is just straight up bull****.

Yeah, I have to go to the store and cannot explain right now. If someone else who is capable of understanding basic human interaction can explain to Stardusk why I am speechless, go ahead...

Modifié par kaileena_sands, 22 décembre 2012 - 07:35 .

[Stardusk]

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

[Nissun]

Stardusk wrote...

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

Have you ever met a young couple in which the woman has a steady job, and the man is unemployed or in a non-steady job? Because it's happening, a lot. I know this must hurt your perception of "MEN MUST HUNT FOR WOMEN BECAUSE ALL WOMEN WANT IS A PROVIDER" perception of us humans, but

It

Is

Happening


Because society is changing. And if only one partner can provide, and that happens to be the woman, then what? Is she going to leave him just because he can't provide for her? The answer is f*cking no, because biology does not dictate what we are, because we're living on the motherf*cking 21st century, and the f*cking "all women care about is shoping" cliche is utter bull****.

Modifié par Nissun, 22 décembre 2012 - 07:35 .

[Stardusk]

Ashen Earth wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

Ashen Earth wrote...

parico wrote...

wow Great job moderators this train wreck should have been locked down several pages ago

I sometimes think ninja stan intentionally leaves these threads open all day because he finds them funny.

Ashen, I know we used to argue about Infiltrators and Sniper Rifles but since hearing your dry, sardonic voice and watching your threads...I think I love you in a brotherly fashion.

This is slightly disturbing.

There you go again, sparking that brotherly love. And look, these days I use Sniper Infiltrators! All thanks to you!

[DevilBeast]

Stardusk wrote...

kaileena_sands wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

kaileena_sands wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

No, not hate but women have always (generally speaking) viewed men as utilities and providers. Whereas men love women (generally speaking), women love what men can give them or do for them and the minute he stops giving it to them they cease to 'love him' or in other words:

... I am speechless.

I am not sure why. Perhaps I should qualify the statement.I do not exclusively mean money. I am still puzzled as to why you are speechless.

I would explain to you but at this point, I think that either you're:

A. Pulling off the most epic troll of all times.

B. Terribly damaged in some way. Or had a terrible luck with the women in your life. Don't you really realise that you basically discarded the notion that women can actually experience romantic love?

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

Now I know you are just talking bull****. Not even science backs you up on that one.

[CitizenThom]

I go to revive Volus first, I'm not sure if I prioritise female or male characters... it's usually a matter of proximity. If things are crazy, I'm in war mode, looking to get the most effective squad members off the ground fastest... If it's a wave 1 revive... I might have the time to decide to revive a fallen female before a fallen male. That's probably because the femninity isn't super obvious in the multiplayer female avatars though.

All that said, Stardusk has some points that should be considered, regardless of whether they are the mainstream way of thought. The things a man receives from a woman that he loves are different from what women receive from the men that they love... I don't believe it's purely the biological symbioticism of hunter-gatherer/hearthkeeper, but those two roles are still a part of the mix, even if other things have been since added to the soup.

[xBUMMx]

kaileena_sands wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Stardusk wrote....

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

There are so many examples of why that is just straight up bull****.

Yeah, I have to go to the store and cannot explain right now. If someone else who is capable of understanding basic human interaction can explain to Stardusk why I am speechless, go ahead...

trust me, we're trying.

[Descy_]

Nissun wrote...
 and the f*cking "all women care about is shoping" cliche is utter bull****.

exactly.

they like cooking too, right?

[DevilBeast]

Stardusk wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

Your "past" relationships?? Well, no wonder they are in the past.

[Stardusk]

Nissun wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

Have you ever met a young couple in which the woman has a steady job, and the man is unemployed or in a non-steady job? Because it's happening, a lot. I know this must hurt your perception of "MEN MUST HUNT FOR WOMEN BECAUSE ALL WOMEN WANT IS A PROVIDER" perception of us humans, but

It

Is

Happening


Because society is changing. And if only one partner can provide, and that happens to be the woman, then what? Is she going to leave him just because he can't provide for her? The answer is f*cking no, because biology does not dictate what we are, because we're living on the motherf*cking 21st century, and the f*cking "all women care about is shoping" cliche is utter bull****.

And women are dissatisfied with the arrangement. 

"Research set to be published in the Journal of Family Issues[/i] next month concluded that women who make more money are more likely to divorce. The 25-year study showed that women who earn a bigger salary than their husbands are 40% more likely to divorce, compared to women in the opposite situation."



Women who earn more are more likely to divorce

Modifié par Stardusk, 22 décembre 2012 - 07:38 .

[megawug]

Guys, stop hijacking the topic. Period.

[Stardusk]

DevilBeast wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

Your "past" relationships?? Well, no wonder they are in the past.

Personal attacks, hmm? This only makes your position weaker. You have offered no counterargument thus far.