765 réponses à ce sujet

[JAZZ_LEG3ND]

Stardusk wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

I'm betting you'd get along with these folks pretty good.
They're on your level.

TL:DR
Son... you need help.

[Stardusk]

JAZZ_LEG3ND wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Theory: A women broke Stardusk's heart many years ago, leaving him with a steaming hatred of all women. Eventually, he realized that hate was illogical, so he searched for stats that make it logical. After years of study, he has come to the conclusion that all women are the same and don't actually love men because that one girl didn't like him. And now he spends his days trying to impart his new found knowledge on the people of the BSN.

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

I'm betting you'd get along with these folks pretty good.
They're on your level.

TL:DR
Son... you need help.

LOL. You're funny....son.

[xBUMMx]

Enough with the stats, they don't ****ing matter. The real world isn't numbers, it's people. And "more likely" doesn't mean anything either. If I run out of Mountain Dew, I'm more likely to go buy more, but that doesn't mean I will.

[Stardusk]

xBUMMx wrote...

Enough with the stats, they don't ****ing matter. The real world isn't numbers, it's people. And "more likely" doesn't mean anything either. If I run out of Mountain Dew, I'm more likely to go buy more, but that doesn't mean I will.

If statistics are meaningless (according to you), what is their purpose? Why produce them at all?

[Descy_]

xBUMMx wrote...

Enough with the stats, they don't ****ing matter. The real world isn't numbers, it's people. And "more likely" doesn't mean anything either. If I run out of Mountain Dew, I'm more likely to go buy more, but that doesn't mean I will.

you should buy Dr. pepper instead, it's much better.

[CitizenThom]

I prefer pluralism over conformity... I think you folks should too, but I'm not going to bully you into thinking like me whenever I catch you disagreeing...because that's not what pluralism is about.

In other words I'm calling a lot of you a bunch of conformists.

Modifié par CitizenThom, 22 décembre 2012 - 07:45 .

[xBUMMx]

Stardusk wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Enough with the stats, they don't ****ing matter. The real world isn't numbers, it's people. And "more likely" doesn't mean anything either. If I run out of Mountain Dew, I'm more likely to go buy more, but that doesn't mean I will.

If statistics are meaningless (according to you), what is their purpose? Why produce them at all?

I don't know. People just got bored? They can provide information, but in reality, they don't mean much.

[Cyonan]

Stardusk wrote...

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

I hate to be the one to break it to you(actually I don't), but we're so different from person to person, to say nothing of from society to society, that you will not actually find any one "nature" that can apply to the majority of men or women.

[xBUMMx]

Descy_ wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

Enough with the stats, they don't ****ing matter. The real world isn't numbers, it's people. And "more likely" doesn't mean anything either. If I run out of Mountain Dew, I'm more likely to go buy more, but that doesn't mean I will.

you should buy Dr. pepper instead, it's much better.

I love both, but I just saw the mountain dew voltage can and I used it as an example.

[CitizenThom]

Cyonan wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

I hate to be the one to break it to you(actually I don't), but we're so different from person to person, to say nothing of from society to society, that you will not actually find any one "nature" that can apply to the majority of men or women.

Then why do advertisers advertise to people as if they're all the same? There are no common threads to appeal to?

[parico]

DevilBeast wrote...

parico wrote...

wow Great job moderators this train wreck should have been locked down several pages ago

They are too busy in the story forum, I guess.

But you are right; this should have been stopped many pages ago (and certaintly before my brain implodes)

So, will anyone else report this thread, or should I??

No need to report it.   it's big enough they have to have seen it.   Ashen is right they are leaving it open since they think its funny. 

[Stardusk]

Cyonan wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

LOL. My past relationships to women are irrelevant. What I am interested in is male and female nature as it actually is, not what the cultural narrative tells us. But I think I could provide data and information all day and you would still cling to fairy tales.

I hate to be the one to break it to you(actually I don't), but we're so different from person to person, to say nothing of from society to society, that you will not actually find any one "nature" that can apply to the majority of men or women.

How little you know if you claim there are no biological behavourial universals. How little you know...

[DevilBeast]

Alright guys, which option should I choose when reporting this thread??
I´m leaning towards hate speech or spam but I´m not sure..

[xBUMMx]

CitizenThom wrote...

I prefer pluralism over conformity... I think you folks should too, but I'm not going to bully you into thinking like me whenever I catch you disagreeing...because that's not what pluralism is about.

In other words I'm calling a lot of you a bunch of conformists.

I'm not conforming to anything, I'm just aware that people aren't numbers and Stardusk is being ridiculous.

Besides, I'd rather be a conformist than a hipster, atleast I'll have more friends.

[xBUMMx]

DevilBeast wrote...

Alright guys, which option should I choose when reporting this thread??
I´m leaning towards hate speech or spam but I´m not sure..

Why not both?

[Tajah Silver-Sparke]

xBUMMx wrote...

I don't even know why Stardusk is still trying.

And Ms./Mrs. Silver-Sparkle, I think for most of us guys, things like that are just instinctual. I know if I see a female teammate on trouble, I try to help in whatever way I can. While I do for some reason feel more impelled to help a female than a male teammate, it really isn't any sort of special treatment, because I will run through the fire and the flames to help any squad member, because it's what I should do, as a good and polite person.

I agree that it is instinctual to help others male or female and I try to help my teammates that are in trouble too.  In fact, I actually feel badly when I am running to medgel someone and they get stomped on, etc.  cause I didn't get to them in time. 

[Nissun]

Stardusk wrote...

Nissun wrote...

Stardusk wrote...

I am more interested as to why you are speechless. I still don't understand. Of course women experience 'romantic love' and do not the idenftify it on the basis of male utility but women select mates that can provide them with a benefit, usually a concrete one.

Have you ever met a young couple in which the woman has a steady job, and the man is unemployed or in a non-steady job? Because it's happening, a lot. I know this must hurt your perception of "MEN MUST HUNT FOR WOMEN BECAUSE ALL WOMEN WANT IS A PROVIDER" perception of us humans, but

It

Is

Happening


Because society is changing. And if only one partner can provide, and that happens to be the woman, then what? Is she going to leave him just because he can't provide for her? The answer is f*cking no, because biology does not dictate what we are, because we're living on the motherf*cking 21st century, and the f*cking "all women care about is shoping" cliche is utter bull****.

And women are dissatisfied with the arrangement. 

"Research set to be published in the Journal of Family Issues[/i] next month concluded that women who make more money are more likely to divorce. The 25-year study showed that women who earn a bigger salary than their husbands are 40% more likely to divorce, compared to women in the opposite situation."



Women who earn more are more likely to divorce

So are we going to revert back to letting the men work and taking care of the children and cleaning the house? Just because of some statistics?

You should be happy that more families are adopting that pattern. It shows that men can devote their lives to raise their children, that they have feelings and fatherly instincts too. You should celebrate it, because right now a lot of people stigmatize men that are economically dependant of women, and that sh*t has to stop.

But hey, no. We hate working! We're lazy! We want to be passive and let others take care of us, taking away our voice in the process!

[megawug]

Guys, stop hijacking the thread.

[CitizenThom]

xBUMMx wrote...

CitizenThom wrote...

I prefer pluralism over conformity... I think you folks should too, but I'm not going to bully you into thinking like me whenever I catch you disagreeing...because that's not what pluralism is about.

In other words I'm calling a lot of you a bunch of conformists.

I'm not conforming to anything, I'm just aware that people aren't numbers and Stardusk is being ridiculous.

Besides, I'd rather be a conformist than a hipster, atleast I'll have more friends.

A conformist and a hipster are the same thing in the end. They're looking to outside approval to determine what they mean to be.

People can be looked at as numbers. Blackjack can be reduced to numbers. You aren't always right in Blackjack, but you can be right often enough to turn a profit.

[megabeast37215]

xBUMMx wrote...
Besides, I'd rather be a conformist than a hipster, atleast I'll have more friends.

Conformity is for the weak-minded.

[CitizenThom]

xBUMMx wrote...

DevilBeast wrote...

Alright guys, which option should I choose when reporting this thread??
I´m leaning towards hate speech or spam but I´m not sure..

Why not both?

I'd say spam if anything, it's certianly not hate speech.

[Stardusk]

DevilBeast wrote...

Alright guys, which option should I choose when reporting this thread??
I´m leaning towards hate speech or spam but I´m not sure..

Hate speech? That is quite funny. Where was hate speech uttered? What hateful things were said?

[xBUMMx]

megabeast37215 wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...
Besides, I'd rather be a conformist than a hipster, atleast I'll have more friends.

Conformity is for the weak-minded.

I'm not saying its good, but people who are so desperate to be "unique" that they hate everything because someone else has heard of it are just sad.

I think everyone should embrace their own interests and not care what other people like, but hipsters are worse than conformists.

I also think that people aren't antelopes, so there's that.

[Nissun]

xBUMMx wrote...

megabeast37215 wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...
Besides, I'd rather be a conformist than a hipster, atleast I'll have more friends.

Conformity is for the weak-minded.

I'm not saying its good, but people who are so desperate to be "unique" that they hate everything because someone else has heard of it are just sad.

I think everyone should embrace their own interests and not care what other people like, but hipsters are worse than conformists.

I also think that people aren't antelopes, so there's that.

I thought people weren't antelopes before it was cool.

[xBUMMx]

Stardusk wrote...

DevilBeast wrote...

Alright guys, which option should I choose when reporting this thread??
I´m leaning towards hate speech or spam but I´m not sure..

Hate speech? That is quite funny. Where was hate speech uttered? What hateful things were said?

You've opened your mouth too many times to reference them all. Your attempts to justify your hate for women aren't getting you anywhere.