1966 réponses à ce sujet

[cory257383]

So far the feedback has been very helpful

[DSxCallOfBooty-]

I'll be recording my match at least, thank goodness for capture cards.

[Uh Cold]

I agree with the idea of double elimination to counter RNG for objectives.
I also agree both teams be present in the same game to compete for score in a platinum match, not gold.
Gold would be a race while platinum tests endurance.

Regarding the objectives I think each team should swap responsibility for completion.
For example team 1 is responsible for completing game 1's objective however they please.
Choosing to milk the objective or do it quickly is up to the team and if the other team is suffering because of it they are welcome to complete it.
Next game would be team 2's responsibilty, this assuming we fight the same teams two times in a row.

Also I will be recording my games as well but for the sake of time I will just PM you screenshots of the scoreboard but have the games on my laptop incase someone decides to cheat or something.

Modifié par Uh Cold, 27 décembre 2012 - 08:09 .

[whateverman7]

so let me get it straight: 2 man group vs set map/enemy, and highest score wins/moves on to the next round?...sounds like fun, let me think about it..

questions/suggestions:

- dont do a 'hat draw' for teams...let people pick who they want as a partner...drawing kinda defeats the purpose of seeing who can put up the best score period, no ifs, ands, nor buts about it....if people are scared of other potential team combos, they shouldnt participate...

- there should be some rule(s) about objective waves, since they are random and can affect score a lot...how about a point bonus for doing the objective in/by a certain amount of time?...ex: finish the 1/2/3/4 with 3:30 left on the clock, get x amount of points added to your score; 3:00 get x amount, and so on...also, i suggest just making the point bonuses the same no matter objectives, a scale so to speak...of course the criteria for getting the bonus would have to be tweeked for each objective

- how many rounds are there gonna be? guess that depends on the number of people that participate huh?....

- can you only participate by giving the name of both team members?..i mean, can 1 person from a team put his/her hat in the ring, and play with someone that's not on the list/in the group?....i figure as long as 1 person on the team is listed/in the group, the other person shouldnt matter....

...like i said, sounds fun, let me think about it...i'm on ps3 by the way...

[VerySeed]

I'll be doing this on xbox btw. Manifest on PC isn't exactly up to standards.

[cory257383]

But if we are doing duo's instead that wont rly matter much. If you dont like the objectives you get you can try again till you get what you want.

The only game that counts is the one I get the info for.

[cory257383]

whateverman7 wrote...

so let me get it straight: 2 man group vs set map/enemy, and highest score wins/moves on to the next round?...sounds like fun, let me think about it..

questions/suggestions:

- dont do a 'hat draw' for teams...let people pick who they want as a partner...drawing kinda defeats the purpose of seeing who can put up the best score period, no ifs, ands, nor buts about it....if people are scared of other potential team combos, they shouldnt participate...

- there should be some rule(s) about objective waves, since they are random and can affect score a lot...how about a point bonus for doing the objective in/by a certain amount of time?...ex: finish the 1/2/3/4 with 3:30 left on the clock, get x amount of points added to your score; 3:00 get x amount, and so on...also, i suggest just making the point bonuses the same no matter objectives, a scale so to speak...of course the criteria for getting the bonus would have to be tweeked for each objective

- how many rounds are there gonna be? guess that depends on the number of people that participate huh?....

- can you only participate by giving the name of both team members?..i mean, can 1 person from a team put his/her hat in the ring, and play with someone that's not on the list/in the group?....i figure as long as 1 person on the team is listed/in the group, the other person shouldnt matter....

...like i said, sounds fun, let me think about it...i'm on ps3 by the way...

Someone suggested the hat because a double spectre x team would destroy most other teams

[cory257383]

yea you can give me names of ppl not on BSN as long as you know they will participate

[Grundle47]

I would be willing to participate (I'm on Xbox) but would need a teammate who can do the recording. I assume that's fine? Both team members do not have to send in a video/screenshot, correct?

[VerySeed]

cory257383 wrote...

whateverman7 wrote...

so let me get it straight: 2 man group vs set map/enemy, and highest score wins/moves on to the next round?...sounds like fun, let me think about it..

questions/suggestions:

- dont do a 'hat draw' for teams...let people pick who they want as a partner...drawing kinda defeats the purpose of seeing who can put up the best score period, no ifs, ands, nor buts about it....if people are scared of other potential team combos, they shouldnt participate...

- there should be some rule(s) about objective waves, since they are random and can affect score a lot...how about a point bonus for doing the objective in/by a certain amount of time?...ex: finish the 1/2/3/4 with 3:30 left on the clock, get x amount of points added to your score; 3:00 get x amount, and so on...also, i suggest just making the point bonuses the same no matter objectives, a scale so to speak...of course the criteria for getting the bonus would have to be tweeked for each objective

- how many rounds are there gonna be? guess that depends on the number of people that participate huh?....

- can you only participate by giving the name of both team members?..i mean, can 1 person from a team put his/her hat in the ring, and play with someone that's not on the list/in the group?....i figure as long as 1 person on the team is listed/in the group, the other person shouldnt matter....

...like i said, sounds fun, let me think about it...i'm on ps3 by the way...

Someone suggested the hat because a double spectre x team would destroy most other teams

Noooo please don't do a hat draw. I'd prefer to duo with someone from Australia than with someone from 'merica/UK cos of lag issues. 

[cory257383]

For the final we can do the original plan of all 4 players in a U/U/P game. All others are duo golds with set maps and enemies. That would be rly cool.

[whateverman7]

cory257383 wrote...

 Someone suggested the hat because a double spectre x team would destroy most other teams

says who?....even if they are that good, isnt that the whole point? to see what you and someone you like playing with can do vs what someone else can do?...not picking your team kinda defeats that to me...

[DHKany]

I am on PS3 btw.

[whateverman7]

cory257383 wrote...

But if we are doing duo's instead that wont rly matter much. If you dont like the objectives you get you can try again till you get what you want.

The only game that counts is the one I get the info for.

some might get lucky and get great objectives all 3 times, but most probably wont...i get what you saying, my suggestion was just to keep the objectives as level a playing field as possible...it's whatever though

[cory257383]

Then pick your teams from the list my friends. I need confirmation from both parties though. Everyone cant pick caineghis. Im with pugz

[VerySeed]

If/when Flaming Snake joins, I'll do it with him.

[cory257383]

[

Modifié par cory257383, 27 décembre 2012 - 08:40 .

[Vlark]

Call me in! Would like to play with a pal of mine, LostEternity.

My Origin-ID is RenasVakarian and obviously Master Race

[Original Twigman]

So... pretty much... Spec X is taking this, correct?

[cory257383]

Feel free to give me team names I will begin updating when I see them

[cory257383]

Original Stikman wrote...

So... pretty much... Spec X is taking this, correct?

Im not officailly a member,  I will fight for us lol

[Uh Cold]

cory257383 wrote...


6. Duo's wil be setmap/setenemy/GOLD.  If both finalists are from same platform, it will go to the original plan. The 4 warriors in an U/U/P lobby, combined score wins. If finalists are from differant platforms it will be setmap/setenemy/P best completion time wins.

NO

Modifié par Uh Cold, 27 décembre 2012 - 08:50 .

[Original Twigman]

I would join this, but if Ashen & Cold are teaming up, its going to be tough for anyone to outplay them.

I think a couple of the people on my friend's list can get close, but Ashen and Cold are a few percentages better than me and mostly everybody - which make all the difference at this level.

Will want to see that video.

[Vlark]

Our Team will be named "NEIN!" LostEternity actually is called WeLostEternity , sorry for the typo.

And when will this Challenge commence? Date's already set?

Modifié par Vlark, 27 décembre 2012 - 08:53 .

[BOSSTER23]

Original Stikman wrote...

I would join this, but if Ashen & Cold are teaming up, its going to be tough for anyone to outplay them.

I think a couple of the people on my friend's list can get close, but Ashen and Cold are a few percentages better than me and mostly everybody - which make all the difference at this level.

Will want to see that video.

Just send me an invite man and we will duo the hell out of this

Modifié par BOSSTER23, 27 décembre 2012 - 08:55 .