Aller au contenu

Photo

Please stop hitting on dragon age's graphic's


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
47 réponses à ce sujet

#1
dark_dragon99

dark_dragon99
  • Members
  • 40 messages
Ok im just gonna come out and say it to all the graphic's hog's Knight's of the old republic didn't have the best graphic's in the world by far but i replayed it meny times. Dragon age look's much much much better then knight's of the old republic. so sure you can complain about the textuer's until they patch it likely soon then later Fallout 3 got a graphic's update over xbox live so why all this whining over a game that look's so bad do think a PS2 could handel this game the answer no it couldn't. The fact is ive seen much worse looking games this generation much much worse. Two world's anyone

#2
Dam Wookie

Dam Wookie
  • Members
  • 130 messages
No. The graphics are average and that deserves to be said.

#3
dark_dragon99

dark_dragon99
  • Members
  • 40 messages
that they are but considering how much content they stuffed into this game you can see why as they basicly over loaded the game with content. good thing to so we are rather lucky that it look's as good as it does

Modifié par dark_dragon99, 04 novembre 2009 - 09:35 .


#4
Nassou

Nassou
  • Members
  • 218 messages
Did they promise you kickass sweet graphics that could melt the eyes of Satan? If you answered no, go complain to your boss that you didn't get a promotion.....every single day.

#5
NetBeansAndJava

NetBeansAndJava
  • Members
  • 504 messages
Yeah, the game overall is good. No questioning it.



However, the graphics are a valid point of criticism. Does it deduct from the game's experience? Yes. Will it affect lasting appeal? Nope. People are gonna love this game regardless of some bad pixels.



If you want a crazy example of just how bad the graphics can get, do the dwarf noble origin. Look at the crowd in the proving grounds. I mean... seriously? They don't even look like dwarves.

#6
dark_dragon99

dark_dragon99
  • Members
  • 40 messages
Im not a graphic's person myself but bioware will likely use another engine in the next one or enhance this one. I gotta say this run's better on PC then the witcher did though. Im still deciding which origin to choose as i'll be spending more the 60 hr's in the first play through so much to do.

Modifié par dark_dragon99, 04 novembre 2009 - 09:43 .


#7
Scorus

Scorus
  • Members
  • 92 messages
The biggest issue with the graphics is the occasional low-res textures imho. Everything looks, however super sweet.

1920x1200 with everything at max = Teh Winz!



And high-res texture packs can be done as DLC or as fan made addons. :)

If you want Crysis graphics, go back to your FPS'es. This is an RPG, and an incredibly good one at that. I'm completely in love with it. Graphic 1337'ness or not! :)



Kudos to you Dark_Dragon :)

#8
AnzacTrooper

AnzacTrooper
  • Members
  • 17 messages
to much dribble wheres there bibs

#9
Frostaxt

Frostaxt
  • Members
  • 137 messages
Actually I was positively surprised about the graphics and am very pleased with them. I play on the highest level of graphics though. As I checked out the lowest settings, they were far from nice I admit. Still since this game really doesn´t require that much PC power, most people should be able to play it with adequate graphics.





P.S.: If you played the mage first, the reason for a "bad" graphic could be the "fade". Means: you are in a dream world and everything is supposed to look blurry!

#10
triggerhippy

triggerhippy
  • Members
  • 62 messages
If they didn't want the graphics to become a topic of contention they should have made the game look better.

AND as paying customers we have a right to voice any opinion of the game.

The graphics DO look bad. I had a friend tonight on Xbox Live who is the first to say a game's story and gameplay should always supercede the graphics tell me that the graphics "looked fuggly as hell". This was the first thing he said when I asked him how he was enjoying the game so far. I told him to hang in there for the story but I haven't read a review of the game not mention how drab the graphics are. People do notice graphics because they are a part of how a game envelops you. They could have (and should have) done better with the graphics.

Modifié par triggerhippy, 04 novembre 2009 - 09:46 .


#11
JackDresden

JackDresden
  • Members
  • 337 messages
I don't really care if the graphics are average I never expected cutting edge graphics from this game.

#12
Nassou

Nassou
  • Members
  • 218 messages
I don't get it. I'm picky about graphics myself, but this game does not look bad to me...at all. I swear, it's like people saw the sacred ashes trailer and expected it to look like that.

#13
dark_dragon99

dark_dragon99
  • Members
  • 40 messages
Still ive been reading and watching review's on it and everybody keep's saying you will spend hundred's of hour's on it. The ign guy didn't sound like he was gonna be done playing for month's plus the DLC which will be heading our way sooner then later.

#14
JackDresden

JackDresden
  • Members
  • 337 messages

Nassou wrote...

I don't get it. I'm picky about graphics myself, but this game does not look bad to me...at all. I swear, it's like people saw the sacred ashes trailer and expected it to look like that.


Probably like me you've been gaming a while, so what we consider good and what a child of the Xbox360 generation consider good is probably not the same. From Video's and screen shots I've seen so far the graphics are good enough.

Modifié par JackDresden, 04 novembre 2009 - 09:53 .


#15
dark_dragon99

dark_dragon99
  • Members
  • 40 messages
same here it's a deep deep deep deep game deeper then any game they made the graphic's has to take a little hit.

#16
triggerhippy

triggerhippy
  • Members
  • 62 messages

JackDresden wrote...

I don't really care if the graphics are average I never expected cutting edge graphics from this game.


Any console game is far from cutting edge graphics and yet there are several (and older) console games that look better (while still having an enjoyable story).

Modifié par triggerhippy, 04 novembre 2009 - 10:00 .


#17
GhoXen

GhoXen
  • Members
  • 1 338 messages
I hope a high res texture pack releases soon. :D

#18
Wormrose

Wormrose
  • Members
  • 18 messages
Well the graphics for this game are worse on console than on the PC. This game should be played on a computer in my opinion, due to graphics and controls being better and you get the editor.

#19
KingSarevok

KingSarevok
  • Members
  • 139 messages
It would have been awesome if they'd just licensed the Crysis-Engine. :P

#20
deirae

deirae
  • Members
  • 9 messages
At what point did graphics become more important to people, than gameplay?



It really is a sad thing that people can't look beyond that.

#21
Jalida

Jalida
  • Members
  • 78 messages
The game has it's moments of fuggly'ness. For example in the beginning as a human warrior after leaving the castle and arriving at the camp. All one needs to do is to walk to the edge of the camp and look out to the mountains (it's all hazed over to hide the uggliness, but that's not the worse, just look down into the valley below and see how **** fugly the trees are and how sparse they are, and this is on the highest settings. It really really brings you out of any immersion the game might have had you holding onto.

But above all, to me the biggest immersion killer is the over ample use of blood splatter. One moment my woman is covered in blood splatter and the next moment she's clean as a whistle, which it might actually be appropriate that if I stuck my sword in somebody chest Im going to get some blood splatter, it's not going to be anywhere near as much as the game seems to want to portray it. Some blood splatter is great, it really draws you in. But when they overdo it, it simply makes the player want to laugh at how cheesy it all looks.  The game will certainly appeal to those that love gratuitous overuse of violence and blood.  Plenty of head cutting off, blood spurting, and even more blood leakage from dead bodies on the ground that quickly disappear so get it while you can before the body disappears along with the stained sidewalks.
The other graphics killer is the way that the environment does not react to the character walking thorugh it.  The bushes and weeds on the ground don't bother to deform when the toon walks through it, perhaps it does in some areas, since I've not completed the game I can't be 100% certain, however the areas I've walked through the weeds stand tall and true and don't deform even in a breeze.  It's all very static.

Modifié par Jalida, 04 novembre 2009 - 10:43 .


#22
BeardedNinja

BeardedNinja
  • Members
  • 501 messages
I was surprised by the console graphics, I was expecting them to be a bit more streamlined, I don't like how when your talking to a character the background is blurry, but there is a small aura around the characters that let you see the background clearly. If that makes any sense....

#23
Athnamos

Athnamos
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Yes the graphic is so-so, but it does help me wonder if that contributed to the smoothness of the game on my PC. I played The Witcher before, with high res texture and details, lagging my PC preformance. Don't get me started with Crysis.



If fugly texture are people's concern. I'm sure there will be hi res texture mod coming around the corner, just like modders did with Mount&Blade.

#24
fearan1

fearan1
  • Members
  • 183 messages
I could deal with average graphics but on the 360 there not average there terrible.  I llke ff10 graphics better and that is a ps2 game,avoid the 360 version like the plague and get the PC . I bought this sight unseen on the strength of bioware's reputation and my love for there other titles and feel burned on the 360 version I will try the PC.

Modifié par fearan1, 04 novembre 2009 - 01:25 .


#25
phimseto

phimseto
  • Members
  • 976 messages
Graphics are the least important element to me in an RPG. I would rather have a 2D or isometric game that was deeper in story and side-quests than a short and shallow, but pretty, RPG.