Aller au contenu

Photo

Can we get an enemy similiar to Loghan?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
597 réponses à ce sujet

#251
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 988 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...
Except that the plague is and always was a lie.

Last I checked, Loghain didn't provide any troops, money, or any resources that could be said to be the profit from selling elves into slavery. The Warden raised the vast majority of the fighting force by himself.

No it's not.  People actually are sick and dying, and one of the women tells Shianni that the Tevinters healed her relative.  I take it that this was part of the bargain, i.e. that they heal people and get to take their pick as slaves.  And several dialogue lines say that Loghain is paying for his troops using the earnings.

His troops should already be well-armed, they lost nothing at Ostagar.


Not his personal troops. The troops he conscripted for service. One of the things you can overhear from people is how able-bodied men are being conscripted into the army to fight to replace the army lost at Ostagar -- mostly from the Arling of Denerim, but a lot of scouting bands had repeatedly gone missing.

Collectively, as General of the army they fall under the broad scope of "his troops", but not his personal army from Ostagar.

You're going to need money to supply those new soldiers.

#252
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Commander Kurt wrote...

A few things doesn't add up in my mind. The whole argument that Loghain quit the field to protect Ferelden (save a force to fight another day) requires you to accept that the battle is impossible to win. But how is this possible?

Would Duncan sacrifice every warden in Ferelden just to stay friends with the king? To what end? And why is Loghain simply not refusing? He strikes me as the type of man who would fight for what he believes, and he sacrificed an army at Ostagar rather than put his foot down.

I guess there is the explanation that it wasn't until the battle had started that Loghain realized that there was no hope. But if so, what does this have to do with the wardens? Why blame them? In the landsmeet when he adresses the nobles after ostagar, he does say that the darkspawn "incursion" must be dealt with, but when questioned about his intentions he states that he has done what he must to secure Fereldens independence. He also adresses the fact that Orlais might take advantage right from the start, and that the darkspawn should be fought "sensibly".

What does this mean? Bigger force to wipe them out with lesser casualties? Smaller force to save some strenght for when Orlais comes knocking?

If bigger, is it then not moronic to let an entire army perish at ostagar?
If smaller, is it then not moronic to let an entire army perish at ostagar?

Why did he let it happen? I get that he wanted Cailan dead, but he poisoned Eamon when he needed him out of the picture. Why sacrifice the army?

He just seems like a moron to me, however I try to look at it.

Not just a moron. Loghain is absolutely bat****, howling-at-the-moon insane. His arrogance and obsession with Orlais cause him to blindly inflict horrorific suffering on everyone around him, for what his fevered brain sees as the "greater good of Ferelden". If he had the presence of mind to stop and consider for a moment that maybe his best days were behind him, and it was time to let younger people prove themselves, then maybe it could have all been avoided.

He refuses to let Cailan have a real say in tactics, because Cailan wants to ally with the Orlesians, and Loghain can't accept that. He can't let his daughter rule, because for all the preparation he gave her, he can't accept that she is a grown woman and no longer needs his protection. His hubris demands that he shoulder the burden alone, which is neither needed nor desired by anyone else, except men like Howe, who exploit Loghain's sickness for their own ends.

People defend Loghain out of misguided sympathy for his past glory and his fall from grace. They clutch at straws to justify his crimes as somehow "necessary", or part of some larger gambit that would apparently make up for all the people he trod on to acheive it. They want him to be "misunderstood" because they feel bad for him. Which is fine. I also pity Loghain, even as I despise him. But past heroics don't cancel out the repulsive and horrific misdeeds of his present. It's far too late for him to be redeemed in any way. A clean execution is the best he can expect, and better than he probably deserves.

Modifié par Plaintiff, 04 janvier 2013 - 12:55 .


#253
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 988 messages
I'm going to bed now and I'll address this entire post when I wake up -- if I have time before I have to go to work -- but...

People defend Loghain out of misguided sympathy for his past glory and his fall from grace. They clutch at straws


Yeah, that's certainly going to make you have a reasonable stance by saying people are misguided and are clutching at straws.

#254
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

I'm going to bed now and I'll address this entire post when I wake up -- if I have time before I have to go to work -- but...

People defend Loghain out of misguided sympathy for his past glory and his fall from grace. They clutch at straws


Yeah, that's certainly going to make you have a reasonable stance by saying people are misguided and are clutching at straws.

Is it really a surprise to you that I hold this opinion? Obviously I think your argument is bad. If I thought otherwise, I would not be arguing against it in the first place.

#255
Gandalf-the-Fabulous

Gandalf-the-Fabulous
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...

If you are going to ask that of me then I would expect the same courtesy of you, or did you forget this?

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

You wanted him to fight an entire horde that decimated the forces at Ostagar -- and would've completely destroyed the entire army there had he charged -- on open plains with only his Teyrnir's forces and one Bann's forces to help him?

I'm sorry, but that is so militarily unsound it's not even funny.


Please do highlight were I said anything like that, out of the two of us I am the only one to respond to what was actually said rather than foul perversion of what you would like to believe has been said so dont go crying foul when the argument doesnt go your way.


Here's what you originally said:

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...

Chewin3 wrote...

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Never mind the fact that most of his actions totally contradict these qualities (apart from the "hates Orlais" part)


Does he now? While yes certain actions of his are questionable, his motives were always the safety of Ferelden. Everything from the death of Cailan to the poisoning of Arl Eamon had a reason to them.


Could have fooled me, is Lothering not a part of Ferelden? Or just a part of it that isnt worth keeping safe?


Which I inferred to mean you wanted him to protect Lothering with what men he had, on open plains, against a horde that would've decimated the Darkspawn.


Dont, just dont, you know that is not what I said so dont cry foul if I may misinterpret what you say (even though even after your rebuttal it still looks like you are claiming that "Xanthos" saw the battle was unwinnable due to the way the soldiers were acting and that he has seen a darkspawn as if the rest of the army has no idea what one is, please correct me if I am wrong here) when you clearly had your arm shoulder deep up your ass to reach that interpretation of my words.

No I do not think Loghain to charge into lands that have already been taken with a small force to retake a villiage that has already been lost, my point was after Ostagar Loghain pretty much abandonned the south (as he did most of Ferelden) in order to get back to Denerim to wage political war and poison political rivals instead of actually doing something about the Darkspawn and looking after the people. No I dont expect Loghain to defend Lothering with a handful of men and eventually get overrun but instead of just riding to Denerim to wage political war he could have at least left a few men to help with an evacuation or put something in place to assist the refugees, hell he doesnt even try to warn Lothering that a large swarm of Darkspawn is heading their way. Lothering is just one example of all the people Loghain has failed to protect dispite his insistance that "he is doing what he thinks is in the best interests of his country".

Actions speak louder than words and throughout the game we see Loghain do nothing to address the Darkspawn threat, in fact the only actions we actually see Loghain perform during Origins do nothing but tear the country apart and generally make things worse at the worst possible time.

#256
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages

Commander Kurt wrote...

A few things doesn't add up in my mind. The whole argument that Loghain quit the field to protect Ferelden (save a force to fight another day) requires you to accept that the battle is impossible to win. But how is this possible?


SImple. He noticed that the battle was impossible to win, just as he says himself. The Ethernal Writer Redux summarized this already couple of pages back.

Would Duncan sacrifice every warden in Ferelden just to stay friends with the king? To what end?


He believed the Darkspawn could have been defeated at Ostagar. Loghain's army wouldn't have made a difference. Simple as that.

And why is Loghain simply not refusing? He strikes me as the type of man who would fight for what he believes, and he sacrificed an army at Ostagar rather than put his foot down.


Which he does, fighting Orlais. And as he states himself , he knew what he lost that day when he left the army fighting the Darskpawn to die. It was the right decision, but he wasn't happy about it.

I guess there is the explanation that it wasn't until the battle had started that Loghain realized that there was no hope. But if so, what does this have to do with the wardens? Why blame them?



Easy. The vast majority of the Wardens stationed at Ostagar were Orlesians. And as paranoid as he was about another Orlaisian invasion--which had recently been rumoured to happen--he saw the Wardens as a threat.

In the landsmeet when he adresses the nobles after ostagar, he does say that the darkspawn "incursion" must be dealt with, but when questioned about his intentions he states that he has done what he must to secure Fereldens independence. He also adresses the fact that Orlais might take advantage right from the start, and that the darkspawn should be fought "sensibly".


Exactly what it means. To calculate how exactly they'd fight the Darkspawn without turning their backs on the Orlesian threat.

What does this mean? Bigger force to wipe them out with lesser casualties? Smaller force to save some strenght for when Orlais comes knocking?


Now you are overly simplifying things. It's not just about gathering X amount of people at an Y location and have it dealt with. War is more complex than that.

If bigger, is it then not moronic to let an entire army perish at ostagar?
If smaller, is it then not moronic to let an entire army perish at ostagar?


Entire army? As far as I recall, Loghain saw that that didn't happen. The majority of the Wardens died, which were Orlesians and Loghain saw it as good riddance. The Ferelden soldiers were of course a pity.

Why did he let it happen? I get that he wanted Cailan dead, but he poisoned Eamon when he needed him out of the picture. Why sacrifice the army?


He never wanted Cailan dead. His death was his own doing. It's not that hard to understand.

He just seems like a moron to me, however I try to look at it.


Guess you are looking at it wrong, then.

Modifié par Chewin3, 04 janvier 2013 - 01:44 .


#257
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages
Exactly how many Orlesian wardens are AT Ostagar for Loghain to murder (or whatever)? I don't recall meeting a single one.

#258
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages
[quote]Plaintiff wrote...
Not just a moron. Loghain is absolutely bat****, howling-at-the-moon insane. His arrogance and obsession with Orlais cause him to blindly inflict horrorific suffering on everyone around him, for what his fevered brain sees as the "greater good of Ferelden". If he had the presence of mind to stop and consider for a moment that maybe his best days were behind him, and it was time to let younger people prove themselves, then maybe it could have all been avoided. [/quote]

He is paranoid and arrogant, though I consider that understandable. He grew up under the "Orlesian reign" over Ferelden, fought for it's freedom and lived to experience yet another attempt from Orlais a few years later (Dragon Age: The Calling). And from recent rumours that Orlais were attempting yet again, who else would he trust that job to, since he is a renowned military commander which many people consider 'unequaled'. 

[/quote]He refuses to let Cailan have a real say in tactics, because Cailan wants to ally with the Orlesians, and Loghain can't accept that.[/quote]

Understandable, since Cailan knows jacksh*it about military tactics and he wasn't aware back then that Cailan was going to ally with Orlais. 

Besides, Cailan still had the last say when it came ot tactics, which Loghain disagreed on but had no say himself.

[quote]He can't let his daughter rule, because for all the preparation he gave her, he can't accept that she is a grown woman and no longer needs his protection. His hubris demands that he shoulder the burden alone, which is neither needed nor desired by anyone else, except men like Howe, who exploit Loghain's sickness for their own ends.[/quote]

Yet Anora has ruled Ferelden for five years, not Cailan and not Loghain. It's his concern as a parent that overtakes him to shoulder the purdon alone of the country. An understandable action, though not a wise one. 

[quote]People defend Loghain out of misguided sympathy for his past glory and his fall from grace. They clutch at straws to justify his crimes as somehow "necessary", or part of some larger gambit that would apparently make up for all the people he trod on to acheive it. They want him to be "misunderstood" because they feel bad for him. Which is fine. I also pity Loghain, even as I despise him. But past heroics don't cancel out the repulsive and horrific misdeeds of his present. It's far too late for him to be redeemed in any way. A clean execution is the best he can expect, and better than he probably deserves.
[/quote]

Right...

With that kind of logic, the polar opposite of this would be me complaining that people who don't understand Loghain's motives and actions are blinded my emotions and throws away all logic b/c of it.

To many--gamers and people of Ferelden a like--Loghain's life could be summarized as: "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain." From a certain viewpoint this could be true, but to tag Loghain as a villain who deserves execution is ludicrous, especially when his motives and several of his actions are understandable and not that hard to grasp.

#259
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Exactly how many Orlesian wardens are AT Ostagar for Loghain to murder (or whatever)? I don't recall meeting a single one.


Don't know / Don't remember.

But concidering they were there to fight off the Darkspawn, I'd say that quite many.

But more importantly, if just two Wardens managed cause such trouble for Loghain, I'd imagine a mere dozen would have brought a catastrophy.

#260
SkittlesKat96

SkittlesKat96
  • Members
  • 1 491 messages
Yeah I liked the way Loghain was written into the story too. At least for me personally it made me question what my ideals for the Grey Wardens were. Are the Grey Wardens meant to be honourable heroes? Should people like Loghain be able to join the Grey Wardens? Where does one draw the line? etc. etc.

#261
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Chewin3 wrote...
He is paranoid and arrogant, though I consider that understandable. He grew up under the "Orlesian reign" over Ferelden, fought for it's freedom and lived to experience yet another attempt from Orlais a few years later (Dragon Age: The Calling). And from recent rumours that Orlais were attempting yet again, who else would he trust that job to, since he is a renowned military commander which many people consider 'unequaled'.

I don't consider it understandable. I expect high-ranking military men to have more to support their beliefs than "rumours". Rumours which, so far, have proven to be entirely false. There is no evidence that Empress Celene is anything other than a genuine friend to Cailan and Ferelden, and it is only a full decade later that we learn that some Orlesians want to invade Ferelden. Not all, probably not even the majority. But Loghain is incapable of making that distinction, because he is a racist.

Yes, Orlais has done terrible things in the past, but in the real world we do not blacklist entire countries forever based on one or even multiple travesties, because that is stupid and bigoted.

Understandable, since Cailan knows jacksh*it about military tactics and he wasn't aware back then that Cailan was going to ally with Orlais.

Besides, Cailan still had the last say when it came ot tactics, which Loghain disagreed on but had no say himself.

Cailan probably knows a lot about military tactics. He made one poor decision which, unfortunatly, led to his own death and had no effect on the larger outcome of the battle, assuming you believe Loghain's assertion that Ostagar was unwinnable. If the number of Darkspawn was truly unprecedented, then there was never any hope at all.

Loghain makes many mistakes in Origins, and made mistakes before that. His lack of patience with Cailan's inexperience is pure hypocrisy. Clearly Loghain had a large say in tactics. The original plan was of his devising, and Cailan had ideas that were arguably very good (like waiting for the Orlesians), which Loghain shouted down. Cailan had the authority to tell Loghain to STFU, but he didn't exercise it. Probably out of respect. It would've behooved Loghain to treat Cailan and others with some respect, instead of bellowing insults at absolutely everybody all of the time.

Yet Anora has ruled Ferelden for five years, not Cailan and not Loghain. It's his concern as a parent that overtakes him to shoulder the purdon alone of the country. An understandable action, though not a wise one.

Anora claims to have ruled Ferelden as the "brains" behind Cailan. A claim for which there is no evidence. The choices she makes in-game are extremely poor, they are not the choices of an intelligent woman, let alone a supposedly shrewd politician. And seeing as how Cailan's reign was short and he had acheived little of note, being the supposed mastermind behind his decisions is nothing to brag about.

As it is, Cailan had ideas for social reform that Anora likely disagreed with, if she even knew about them. For instance, he confides to a City Elf Warden that he would like to dispose of the alienage and integrate the human and elven peoples. He also plans to divorce Anora and wed Celene, a move I doubt that Anora would support, if she's even aware of it. It is extremely fortuitous for Anora that Cailan died when he did. Her apparent control over him was slipping.

Nevertheless, the fact remains that any faith  Loghain had in Anora, justfied or not, evaporated completely in a time of crisis. I am not disputing whether or not his action is "understandable", I am stating that it was an objectively stupid action. He could've and should've backed down when the Bannorn rightfully abandoned him enmasse, but he is a blind fool.

Right...

With that kind of logic, the polar opposite of this would be me complaining that people who don't understand Loghain's motives and actions are blinded my emotions and throws away all logic b/c of it.

Maybe.

I understand Loghain's motivations perfectly well. I doubt that anyone could understand his actions. There is no logic behind them to understand. Declaring himself regent was stupid, poisoning Eamon was stupid and despicable, his promotion of Howe was stupid, his deal with Uldred was stupid, his decision to try and assassinate the Wardens was stupid, selling the elves into slavery was stupid and unforgiveable. Every single thing he does is stupid. These are not the actions of a tactical genius, these are the actions of a raving, drooling madman.

To many--gamers and people of Ferelden a like--Loghain's life could be summarized as: "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain." From a certain viewpoint this could be true, but to tag Loghain as a villain who deserves execution is ludicrous, especially when his motives and several of his actions are understandable and not that hard to grasp.

Loghain's statement is nonsense. Losing the love of his fellow countrymen was not an inevitability. He lost it through his own actions and has only himself to blame. He is not a misunderstood anti-hero. He is not some medieval Spiderman, falling victim to the shifting whims of a fickle media and a gullible populace. He betrayed Ferelden in every respect. He tore it apart with his vanity. He committed atrocious crimes of a staggering scale. He spilled enough Ferelden blood that he could easily drown in it. There is no motive or combination of motives sympathetic enough to absolve him.

You're right about one thing. Loghain doesn't deserve execution. He deserves to suffer the way he has made his country and its people suffer. Execution is a mercy.

Modifié par Plaintiff, 04 janvier 2013 - 03:27 .


#262
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Filament wrote...

I was under the impression that it was a sham in the sense that Tevinter introduced it to begin with. The classic smallpox-blankets trope. Either way to try to gloss over them taking slaves as any kind of positive because their supposed "healing" is kind of grotesque IMO.

That's possible, but considering the sanitation in the alienage and Howe's purge, some sort of epidemic going through the survivors is hardly out of the realm of possibility.  As Valendrian says, it has happened before.  Also no one, not even Shianni, says that the sickness started after the Tevinters got there.  Shianni is complaining about people disappearing.

No one's "glossing over" anything.  It is a horrific solution to a problem that the Fereldan government helped create by neglect and oppression.  There's nothing good about it.  However it does have bleak logic.  No doubt tax collection has been completely disrupted, and Howe is stealing public funds for his own coffers, so there's nothing left to pay the army.  Troops have to be fed, equipped and paid, so you don't keep an army together just on good will.  Those troops are part of the force that eventually defeats the Blight.

Modifié par Addai67, 04 janvier 2013 - 03:45 .


#263
Gandalf-the-Fabulous

Gandalf-the-Fabulous
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

Chewin3 wrote...

People defend Loghain out of misguided sympathy for his past glory and his fall from grace. They clutch at straws to justify his crimes as somehow "necessary", or part of some larger gambit that would apparently make up for all the people he trod on to acheive it. They want him to be "misunderstood" because they feel bad for him. Which is fine. I also pity Loghain, even as I despise him. But past heroics don't cancel out the repulsive and horrific misdeeds of his present. It's far too late for him to be redeemed in any way. A clean execution is the best he can expect, and better than he probably deserves.


Right...

With that kind of logic, the polar opposite of this would be me complaining that people who don't understand Loghain's motives and actions are blinded my emotions and throws away all logic b/c of it.


Well a few people in this thread have already tried to say that those who dont think Loghain is a well written character are too stupid to understand Loghain's actions and are trying to paint Loghain as a simple evil villain because anything more complex than that blows their simple minds, you claim that we throw away logic when the truth is there is no real logic to Loghain's actions or the story as a whole.

Since this thread is getting a little muddy lets start from the beginning starting with Howe's attack on the Couslands.

Why would Howe attack the Couslands when the only thing that could possibly come from it is being charged for treason and executed? The only real explanations for this are

A) He and Loghain were already working together and he knew that Loghain was about to betray the king

B) Howe is psychic and can see the future

C) Howe is both an idiot and extremely lucky

D) Bad writing

Now to be fair this has little to do with Loghain and is probably more indicative of Origins as a whole being poorly written but you do have to wonder why Loghain (who has given himself the title of regent) puts Howe of all people in such a position of power unless they were already working together before Ostagar.


Now for Loghain abandonning the King at Ostagar. Ok I can concede that Loghain needed to pull out to save his troops and I am sure DG would probably confirm that, still to accept this we have to ignore all the evidence put forward that suggests that it was Loghain's betrayal that caused the loss, we need to ignore the evil smirk Loghain gives the camera suggesting that he planned to do something nefarious during the battle, we need to ignore the fact that all the previous battles had gone so well that nobody considered it to be a true blight, we also need to ignore the fact that the fight was started on their own terms (suggesting it was a fight they thought they could win) with Cailan's army needing to goad the Darkspawn horde into attacking, we also need to ignore statements from characters like Aveline that suggest "we fell to betrayal, not to darkspawn" which is exactly how it looks from the players point of view.


As for the poisoning of Eamon here are to possible explanations

A) Loghain knew Eamon is too emotionally unstable to view Loghain's actions logically and would have started a civil war had he not been poisoned, even though the Warden kills his son and he is totally fine with it.

B) Eamon is greedy and would use the tragedy to start a civil war in order increase his standing and expand his power base within the country, even though the epilogue states that due to the popularity of Tegan in Redcliffe Eamon gave up his position and gave it to Tegan willingly.

C) Loghain is an idiot who overreacted who put in motion an ill concieved plan to stop what he thought might happen and ended up only making things worse

D) Loghain planned to get the King killed and had planned to poison Eamon because he knew Eamon would be a major obstacle in his mad grab for power.

E) Bad writing

This is not to mention that Eamon diddnt even get a chance to accuse him which suggests that he was either pretty damn quick to poison Eamon before heading back to Denerim or he had already hired an agent to perform the deed before the battle at Ostagar suggesting that the poisoning was planned before the King fell.

Chewin3 wrote...

But more importantly, if just two Wardens managed cause such trouble for Loghain, I'd imagine a mere dozen would have brought a catastrophy.


Loghain drew first blood and there is no way the Wardens could have effectively fought the Darkspawn with Loghain trying the hinder them every step of the way, not only was Loghain not doing anything to stop the blight he was also focusing all his power on trying to hinder those who would try to fight the blight, the only way they could effectively strike a blow against the Darkspawn was to remove Loghain from his position of power then focus their efforts against the Darkspawn.

I am sure if DG were to come in here he would try to tell us that Loghain is a patriot that would save Ferelden at any cost (except accepting aid from Orlais) even if those actions are morally questional, however given Loghain's actions within the game there is no way I can take this assertion seriously.

If you want to see some well written antagonists then go play the Witcher 2 but dont try to make out Loghain is something he isnt.

#264
Iosev

Iosev
  • Members
  • 685 messages
I personally thought that Loghain was an interesting character. Loghain clearly loved his country, but he let his hatred of Orlais get the best of him, and in doing so, ironically hurt many of the people in his beloved country.

Modifié par arcelonious, 04 janvier 2013 - 05:30 .


#265
alex90c

alex90c
  • Members
  • 3 175 messages

Cailan probably knows a lot about military tactics.


Anora claims to have ruled Ferelden as the "brains" behind Cailan. A claim for which there is no evidence.


lol

so it's ok for you to make claims without evidence but nobody else can? lololol

#266
Fiacre

Fiacre
  • Members
  • 501 messages

alex90c wrote...

Cailan probably knows a lot about military tactics.


Anora claims to have ruled Ferelden as the "brains" behind Cailan. A claim for which there is no evidence.


lol

so it's ok for you to make claims without evidence but nobody else can? lololol


Particularly when the game tells us the opposite :mellow:

"Loghain waits eagerly to bore me with his strategies." - Cailan

"It is common knowledge that in the five years Anora and Cailan held the throne together, she was the one wielding the power. She is held in much higher esteem than her husband by the people of Ferelden, nobility and commoners alike, and commands the respect even of foreign nations, having once inspired Empress Celene of Orlais to declare, "Anora of Ferelden is a solitary rose among brambles." - Anora's codex entry

"Anora was a capable administrator of Cailan's lands, (...)" - Eamon

"What do you suppose Eamon is playing at? Surely he doesn't expect us to believe Anora unfit to rule with her father to advise her." - Bann Alfstanna

And that's just what I remembered off the top of my head. There may very well be more.

#267
Dabrikishaw

Dabrikishaw
  • Members
  • 3 244 messages

Filament wrote...

I was under the impression that it was a sham in the sense that Tevinter introduced it to begin with. The classic smallpox-blankets trope.


So did I. In fact I thought that was the point.

#268
Dorrieb

Dorrieb
  • Members
  • 331 messages

Plaintiff wrote...
I understand Loghain's motivations perfectly well. I doubt that anyone could understand his actions. There is no logic behind them to understand. Declaring himself regent was stupid, poisoning Eamon was stupid and despicable, his promotion of Howe was stupid, his deal with Uldred was stupid, his decision to try and assassinate the Wardens was stupid, selling the elves into slavery was stupid and unforgiveable. Every single thing he does is stupid. These are not the actions of a tactical genius, these are the actions of a raving, drooling madman.


I dunno that I would go quite that far. I think that his actions are understandable if you look at the situation from his point of view and understand that he is a ruthless, cruel man who will stop at nothing to achieve his goals (which fits my definition of 'evil', but apparently not everyone thinks so).

Of course we know that he was wrong, while being megalomaniacally certain that he was in the right, and in that sense you could certainly call him 'mad', but hardly drooling or stupid.

#269
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages

Dorrieb wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...
I understand Loghain's motivations perfectly well. I doubt that anyone could understand his actions. There is no logic behind them to understand. Declaring himself regent was stupid, poisoning Eamon was stupid and despicable, his promotion of Howe was stupid, his deal with Uldred was stupid, his decision to try and assassinate the Wardens was stupid, selling the elves into slavery was stupid and unforgiveable. Every single thing he does is stupid. These are not the actions of a tactical genius, these are the actions of a raving, drooling madman.


I dunno that I would go quite that far. I think that his actions are understandable if you look at the situation from his point of view and understand that he is a ruthless, cruel man who will stop at nothing to achieve his goals (which fits my definition of 'evil', but apparently not everyone thinks so).

Of course we know that he was wrong, while being megalomaniacally certain that he was in the right, and in that sense you could certainly call him 'mad', but hardly drooling or stupid.

I think letting your own army get decimated by a horde of evil creatures while claiming they aren't a threat is quite idiotic.

#270
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

Atakuma wrote...

I think letting your own army get decimated by a horde of evil creatures while claiming they aren't a threat is quite idiotic.


Too bad that we never get any rough count of soldiers in any of the battles. How many soldiers does Ferelden have? Four legions of Chevaliers (IIRC) was enough to be seen as a threat to the sovereignty of Ferelden, that is the best headcount I know of.

#271
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages
Loghain has a sizeable enough army that Eamon chooses a political showdown versus a military confrontation.

He never, ever says the darkspawn aren't a threat. He doesn't believe it's a Blight, at least until the endgame. But he certainly agrees that they're a threat, hence why he tries to rally the rest of the country to fight them.

The game doesn't do a great job of presenting the Orlesian threat in proper context. Only thirty years on and you see very few signs of how brutal the occupation and how unlikely Ferelden's victory was. You'd have to read codex to find references to Orlais' history of using disasters to grab territory. Finally I don't think many people grasp that by any normal measure, four legions (twelve divisions, as Riordan says) of heavy cavalry is a massive force- and this before anyone knew for sure they had a Blight. Finally, Return to Ostagar and hints in DA2 suggest that Orlais indeed did have designs on Ferelden. So those people saying that Loghain was mad are adopting a very breezy attitude toward Orlais that does have support in the game, but isn't the only way of looking at the facts on the ground.

#272
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

alex90c wrote...

Cailan probably knows a lot about military tactics.


Anora claims to have ruled Ferelden as the "brains" behind Cailan. A claim for which there is no evidence.


lol

so it's ok for you to make claims without evidence but nobody else can? lololol


Indeed.

Cailan knows a lot about military tactics? LOL.

Leaving a bottleneck position into a GLORIOUS head on assault against a much larger army? Check.

Placing the archers in front, thus limiting thhe numbers of volleys and endangering them? Check.

Wasting the entire hounds contigent as cannon fodder? Check.

He single handedly doomed the entire battle.

There's plenty of evidence. Even given by people hostile to Anora. Strange, huh?

So three years later & Loghain still is on everybody's radar? Huh, imagine that. :o:devil:

#273
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages

Addai67 wrote...
Finally I don't think many people grasp that by any normal measure, four legions (twelve divisions, as Riordan says) of heavy cavalry is a massive force- and this before anyone knew for sure they had a Blight.



What is a legion in the DA universe? 5000-6000 people like in the Roman Empire or only 500?
And if you use Swiss battle tactics from late medieval age, an huge cavalry army isn't such a problem.

#274
Gandalf-the-Fabulous

Gandalf-the-Fabulous
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

Persephone wrote...

alex90c wrote...


Cailan probably knows a lot about military tactics.



Anora claims to have ruled Ferelden as the "brains" behind Cailan. A claim for which there is no evidence.


lol

so it's ok for you to make claims without evidence but nobody else can? lololol


Indeed.

Cailan knows a lot about military tactics? LOL.

Leaving a bottleneck position into a GLORIOUS head on assault against a much larger army? Check.

Placing the archers in front, thus limiting thhe numbers of volleys and endangering them? Check.

Wasting the entire hounds contigent as cannon fodder? Check.

He single handedly doomed the entire battle.

There's plenty of evidence. Even given by people hostile to Anora. Strange, huh?

So three years later & Loghain still is on everybody's radar? Huh, imagine that. :o:devil:


I thought it was Loghain who was responsible the strategy used at Ostagar and that Cailan was just following Loghain's battle plan?

#275
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Bfler wrote...

What is a legion in the DA universe? 5000-6000 people like in the Roman Empire or only 500?
And if you use Swiss battle tactics from late medieval age, an huge cavalry army isn't such a problem.

I don't think anyone knows, but 500 heavy horse is still a lot considering Ferelden apparently has none at all.

Switzerland had the Alps.  Defeating horsed knights is never easy, but it helps to be able to funnel them into a narrow valley where your pikemen can hold them in a bottleneck while crossbows pick them off from above.  Ferelden is mostly lowland.  In Maric's rebellion, the war dragged on for three years after Loghain's big win at River Dane, and was only ultimately ended by Maric dueling the usurper.

Modifié par Addai67, 04 janvier 2013 - 09:03 .