I would would rather like Charade (Gamlen's daughter) as a companion...anyone else?
#51
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 07:31
#52
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 07:33
I can't blame you as her facial features, and clothing were generic.Shadowfang12 wrote...
Wow....I honestly don't even remember who that is. It's been forever since I've played DA2 lol.
#53
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 07:39
Guest_Puddi III_*
And I'm sure if she became a companion this would cease to be the case, and there would be much rage.The Hierophant wrote...
I can't blame you as her facial features, and clothing were generic.Shadowfang12 wrote...
Wow....I honestly don't even remember who that is. It's been forever since I've played DA2 lol.
#54
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 07:42
How dare they remove the purple lipstick! It defined Merril.Filament wrote...
And I'm sure if she became a companion this would cease to be the case, and there would be much rage.The Hierophant wrote...
I can't blame you as her facial features, and clothing were generic.Shadowfang12 wrote...
Wow....I honestly don't even remember who that is. It's been forever since I've played DA2 lol.
Modifié par Herr Uhl, 30 décembre 2012 - 07:42 .
#55
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 07:48
#56
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 08:25
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
hoorayforicecream wrote...
Flog the 63rd wrote...
hoorayforicecream wrote...
Flog the 63rd wrote...
Ok then, I'll redefine normal as: Not homicidal or possessed.
Given how much combat there is in Dragon Age, not even your protagonist could qualify for those criteria.
I mean not a murderer. I don't class shepard or the warden or hawke as murderers
What makes the killings Shepard, Hawke, or the Warden commit different from the killings the companions that you dislike commit?
Well I can't speak for yours, but my Shepards, Hawkes and Wardens avoid combat at all costs, and only attacks if there is truly no other option or if they are attacked.
Plus, I don't dislike those companions at all, I love Anders as a character, I find him fascinating; I was merely saying that I don't think they are normal. Don't you see the difference?
#57
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 08:30
I think there'll be rage no matter what is done with her appearance.Filament wrote...
And I'm sure if she became a companion this would cease to be the case, and there would be much rage.The Hierophant wrote...
I can't blame you as her facial features, and clothing were generic.Shadowfang12 wrote...
Wow....I honestly don't even remember who that is. It's been forever since I've played DA2 lol.
Modifié par The Hierophant, 30 décembre 2012 - 08:31 .
#58
Guest_PurebredCorn_*
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 08:49
Guest_PurebredCorn_*
Filament wrote...
And I'm sure if she became a companion this would cease to be the case, and there would be much rage.The Hierophant wrote...
I can't blame you as her facial features, and clothing were generic.
LOL... how sad that this is so very true.
#59
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 10:36
I don't recall hearing about various attacks and/or killings that the companions committed when not in the presence of Hawke or the Warden. So if they are taking the PC's cue as to when to engage in combat, how are they held to a different standard?Flog the 63rd wrote...
Well I can't speak for yours, but my Shepards, Hawkes and Wardens avoid combat at all costs, and only attacks if there is truly no other option or if they are attacked.
You previously qualified "normal" as "Not homicidal or possessed." So far as I remember, only Wynne and Anders were possessed, after a fashion, as in they shared a bond with a spirit. That's certainly an unusual status to be in, even for the DA-verse, but not unheard of.Plus, I don't dislike those companions at all, I love Anders as a character, I find him fascinating; I was merely saying that I don't think they are normal. Don't you see the difference?
I think hoorayforicecream summed it up best with something she posted, which I will quote, in part:
hoorayforicecream wrote...
I don't think the word "normal" is the word you should be using to describe an adventurer. I think "type of personality that I like" is more accurate.
#60
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 10:44
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
whykikyouwhy wrote...
I don't recall hearing about various attacks and/or killings that the companions committed when not in the presence of Hawke or the Warden. So if they are taking the PC's cue as to when to engage in combat, how are they held to a different standard?Flog the 63rd wrote...
Well I can't speak for yours, but my Shepards, Hawkes and Wardens avoid combat at all costs, and only attacks if there is truly no other option or if they are attacked.You previously qualified "normal" as "Not homicidal or possessed." So far as I remember, only Wynne and Anders were possessed, after a fashion, as in they shared a bond with a spirit. That's certainly an unusual status to be in, even for the DA-verse, but not unheard of.Plus, I don't dislike those companions at all, I love Anders as a character, I find him fascinating; I was merely saying that I don't think they are normal. Don't you see the difference?
I think hoorayforicecream summed it up best with something she posted, which I will quote, in part:hoorayforicecream wrote...
I don't think the word "normal" is the word you should be using to describe an adventurer. I think "type of personality that I like" is more accurate.
I'm done talking. All I was saying is that some characters are more level headed and reasonable than others, and this is my basis for normality in the contenxct of DA2, and I thought of Charade to be level headed.
If you really care this much to be arguing semantics instewad of giving your actual opinion, maybe you should start a thread debating what people mean by normal instead.
Now either contribute to the discussion of Charade as a viable companion, or please leave the thread.
Cheers
#61
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:05
#62
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:06
Flog the 63rd wrote...
I'm done talking. All I was saying is that some characters are more level headed and reasonable than others, and this is my basis for normality in the contenxct of DA2, and I thought of Charade to be level headed.
If you really care this much to be arguing semantics instewad of giving your actual opinion, maybe you should start a thread debating what people mean by normal instead.
Now either contribute to the discussion of Charade as a viable companion, or please leave the thread.
Cheers
It's hard to argue semantics when you keep changing the definition almost every post. If you can't even present a consistent and defensible definition of "normal", how can you expect anyone to take you seriously?
That said, I'm all for abnormal companions. I like them. It makes them much more interesting to me than a milquetoast ordinary person thrown into a crazy situation. I want an elven warrior with the drive to prove she is a better knight than any human. I want a smarmy scoundrel of a rogue who talks big, but has a heart of gold. I want an obsessed fire mage who will stop at nothing to get revenge on those that scarred him. I want a somewhat insane, but lovable barbarian who dedicates himself to defeating evil in the name of justice. I want an eccentric tinker who joins the hero in order to find the missing pieces to his greatest invention. I want a
Part of the fun of fantasy is fantasy. Larger-than-life personas and interesting extremes. I've got plenty of normality in real life, I don't need it in my games.
#63
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:13
hoorayforicecream wrote...
Flog the 63rd wrote...
I'm done talking. All I was saying is that some characters are more level headed and reasonable than others, and this is my basis for normality in the contenxct of DA2, and I thought of Charade to be level headed.
If you really care this much to be arguing semantics instewad of giving your actual opinion, maybe you should start a thread debating what people mean by normal instead.
Now either contribute to the discussion of Charade as a viable companion, or please leave the thread.
Cheers
It's hard to argue semantics when you keep changing the definition almost every post. If you can't even present a consistent and defensible definition of "normal", how can you expect anyone to take you seriously?
That said, I'm all for abnormal companions. I like them. It makes them much more interesting to me than a milquetoast ordinary person thrown into a crazy situation. I want an elven warrior with the drive to prove she is a better knight than any human. I want a smarmy scoundrel of a rogue who talks big, but has a heart of gold. I want an obsessed fire mage who will stop at nothing to get revenge on those that scarred him. I want a somewhat insane, but lovable barbarian who dedicates himself to defeating evil in the name of justice. I want an eccentric tinker who joins the hero in order to find the missing pieces to his greatest invention. I want a
Part of the fun of fantasy is fantasy. Larger-than-life personas and interesting extremes. I've got plenty of normality in real life, I don't need it in my games.
Agreed, but we need somone levelheaded to contrast the nutheads with. Like Aveline and Varric.
#64
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:15
Aolbain wrote...
Agreed, but we need somone levelheaded to contrast the nutheads with. Like Aveline and Varric.
Levelheaded doesn't necessarily equate to normal though. Varric's got a crazy family and a brother who tried to kill the protagonist. I described Aveline before. They just need to be level-headed.
#65
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:17
#66
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:21
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Could someone please post a picture of this person? I still am completely clueless who this person is and I beat the game like 3 times, so I feel pretty dumb right now haha.
It's okay.

She was in a side quest for Gamlen's letter in Act III of Dragon Age II.
Personally, I'd like it if she at least had an appearance in Dragon Age: Inquisition.
#67
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:21
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Could someone please post a picture of this person? I still am completely clueless who this person is and I beat the game like 3 times, so I feel pretty dumb right now haha.
#68
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:23
#69
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:24
#70
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:43
#71
Posté 30 décembre 2012 - 11:46
Edit: Not that i'm against her joining, of course. Given Biowares track record with making compelling characters, I'm sure they could do a stellar job at making a stone an engaging companion (which, now that I think about it, they did
Modifié par gangly369, 31 décembre 2012 - 12:55 .
#72
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 12:04
Yeah. Although, the prostitute eyeshadow would have to go....what?
#73
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 12:06
#74
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 12:12
#75
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
Posté 31 décembre 2012 - 01:01
Guest_Flog the 63rd_*
Dabrikishaw wrote...
Flog the 63rd, master of the backpeddle.
Hahaha, indeed, although I still don't see the point in arguing over the word instead of actually contributing to the thread.
Speaking of contributing to the thread, do you have any input or are you just being a little rude?





Retour en haut







