LobselVith8 wrote...
When Hawke says his mother is with the Maker as the only dialogue option where he isn't berating Merrill for trying to comfort him, when Hawke tells Feynriel that he hopes the Maker guides him, when I don't have the same freedom I did in Origins, then you're factually inaccurate with such a statement. And there's nothing 'militant' about simply not sharing the religious views of Andrastians.
I've already deal with the Merril example. If you want to stick your head in the sand, then that's your business. I also like how you move the goalposts - now all of a sudden it's "without berating Merril for trying to comfort him".
You want to play this game? Fine. Here are the DA:O options when Wynne asks you what it means to be a Grey Warden:
[*]It means I've been chosen to do something important.
[*]Glory and honor on the battlefield.
[*]I suppose its about killing as many darkspawn as possible.
[*]It means everyone needs to show me some respect.
(-3)
[*]I don't know. Does it have to mean something?
Where is my
being kidnapped and forced to leave your parents to die option? No? Not there? Oh noes, my freedom! DA:O doesn't let you have nuanced views about the Wardens. It broke no less than 3 character concepts I had when it came up. But I roll with it, becuase that's the reality of a game that doesn't have unlimited dialogue options.
You're obsessing over this line to prove some point about DA:O and DA2 - but you're wrong. You're just whining about your view now - all of a sudden Hawke isn't being religious without your consent, you're just "forced" to choose the line so you don't berate Merril.
Actually, the Surana line where he condemns the Chantry was about the fall of the Dales; it had nothing to do with the plight of the mages. You're wrong again.
Can you read? I said
most of the lines, first of all. So I have absolutely no idea what you're on about here, other than to prove that you can't apparently parse grammar.
Not to mention that this line is open to all origins.
Is there a line where Hawke says he doesn't believe in the Maker, or
that he doesn't believe in an afterlife? No? Then my point stands.
Your point doesn't stand at all. I don't go around telling my Chrstian friends on Christmas that I think their religion is nonsensical, but that doesn't suddenly make me a Christian. Let's play the quote game:
or say that a loved one is now with your god (Leandra). It removes my agency over the protagonist.
Nothing forces you to pick this line. There's no way, in context, that this line is ambiguous - it is
clearly about the afterlife. So you have just picked a line that says to Merrill: you are correct, my mother is in the afterlife. And then the spoken like is Andrastian - becuase Hawke, if religious is Andrastian.
And this is exactly the same kind of freedom you get in DA:O. Because you can't have a human character who believes in the Creators.
There's no alternative to Hawke being religiously Andrastian, only two
rude lines to someone who is trying to comfort him, and you also ignore
the other examples mentioned in this thread.
There's no alternative
to the human Warden worshiping the Maker if you choose to have a religious Mage/Cousland. This is not "less freedom than DA:O" that you constantly go on about.
More importantly, you've just moved the goalposts from here to the other side of North America when you've suddenly made it about "two rude lines".
And I haven't ignored other examples - I've asked you for proof, while I'm scouring the internet to see how else you've just intentionally misled everyone on this forum by misquoting scenes to suit your own agenda.
Modifié par In Exile, 02 janvier 2013 - 07:43 .