Yes, I'm partularly talking about the absurdity of endings (Star Child concept). I reinstalled ME3 not a long time ago, hoping that Extended Cut brought something actually new to the table, but it only expanded on the overall failure of original concept.
Does Bioware has writing quality control?
#1
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:43
Yes, I'm partularly talking about the absurdity of endings (Star Child concept). I reinstalled ME3 not a long time ago, hoping that Extended Cut brought something actually new to the table, but it only expanded on the overall failure of original concept.
#2
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:44
#3
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:45
Russian here, pardon my spelling errors
Modifié par Kira Sierra Cyrus, 03 janvier 2013 - 01:46 .
#4
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:49
#5
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:50
#6
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:52
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Nothing wrong with it, you simply don't like it.
Him and thousands of people. You're always praising BioWare while ignoring the movements like Hold the Line, Demand and Retake ME3. It's not only him. A lot of people still consider those endings to be poorly written, even with the EC.
Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 01:55 .
#7
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:54
Because those 'movements' are beyond ridiculous.Teddie Sage wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Nothing wrong with it, you simply don't like it.
Him and thousands of people. Don't be so arrogant. You're always praising BioWare while ignoring the movements like Hold the Line, Demand and Retake ME3.
Why can't I praise Bioware, when they've made a product I really enjoy? ****ing and moaning on here about every little detail is a-okay, but actually saying nice things about the games is 'arrogant'? lol
#8
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:56
Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:00 .
#9
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 01:56
Modifié par Ninja Stan, 03 janvier 2013 - 07:22 .
#10
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:03
#11
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:03
Teddie Sage wrote...
Yes it is arrogant when you assume that only the OP hated the endings. You love your game so much that you spit on the people who were hurt because of the endings. That is arrogance. Plus, you know nothing about the Retake movement so I'd retire that statement of yours if I were you.
Retake movement, they gave us the EC and donated 80k to charity. The charity had to stop taking donations when a high number of people asked for their donations back when they realised they weren't paying for a new ending.
So I guess they did achieve two really good things, it was just unfortunately surrounded by so much bad.
#12
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:07
Our_Last_Scene wrote...
Teddie Sage wrote...
Yes it is arrogant when you assume that only the OP hated the endings. You love your game so much that you spit on the people who were hurt because of the endings. That is arrogance. Plus, you know nothing about the Retake movement so I'd retire that statement of yours if I were you.
Retake movement, they gave us the EC and donated 80k to charity. The charity had to stop taking donations when a high number of people asked for their donations back when they realised they weren't paying for a new ending.
So I guess they did achieve two really good things, it was just unfortunately surrounded by so much bad.
Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.
Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:08 .
#13
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:09
"Oh we're the saviors of gaming! We'll save all you dirty peasants who likes the terrible endings, with our superior and highly sophisticated views!" Laughable.
#14
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:11
#15
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:12
Teddie Sage wrote...
Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.
That pages says:
We are not affiliated with any company or organization. We are grassroots organization fueled by our own individual hearts and pockets.
I don't really see anything that links it to the 63k Retake movement, though you should link it on their facebook.
Modifié par Our_Last_Scene, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:13 .
#16
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:12
#17
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:13
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.
Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Brovikk, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.
Modifié par Femlob, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:14 .
#18
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:14
Our_Last_Scene wrote...
Teddie Sage wrote...
Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.
That pages says:We are not affiliated with any company or organization. We are grassroots organization fueled by our own individual hearts and pockets.
I don't really see anything that links it to the 63k Retake movement, though you should link it on their facebook.
We aren't affiliated to it, of course. But this doesn't stop us from spreading the word. Demand isn't our headquarters anymore. Most of the serious retakers use the page I posted in my signature. The Log is the better place for the Retake movement and our Admin is encouraging our people to join them.
#19
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:14
lolwatFemlob wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.
Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Broviik, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.
#20
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:15
Femlob wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.
Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Brovikk, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.
This just made my day.
#21
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:16
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
lolwatFemlob wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.
Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Broviik, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.
Its what you promote.
#22
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:16
Ironhandjustice wrote...
The quality control was destroyed on the rEAper attack.
The most probable answer, seeing rEApers' work in other areas
#23
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:16
Robhuzz wrote...
Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D
Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.
#24
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:19
Teddie Sage wrote...
Robhuzz wrote...
Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D
Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.
Agreed. btw, is it impossible to get a good Quarian / Geth resolution if I punched Han Gerrel?
#25
Posté 03 janvier 2013 - 02:19
Teddie Sage wrote...
Robhuzz wrote...
Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D
Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.
They even made the choices from ME1&2 matter in what you would choose and the options available.
How did they manage to screw so much at the end? It looks like they were indeed trying to torch the franchise.
Punching that idiot doesn´t prevent peace. You must do all side missions and have adm Tali, no idea if something else.
Modifié par Nerevar-as, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:21 .





Retour en haut







