Aller au contenu

Photo

Does Bioware has writing quality control?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
298 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Kira Sierra Cyrus

Kira Sierra Cyrus
  • Members
  • 110 messages
Basically what it is in the title: does Bioware has some kind of writing quality control? Or people like Mac Walters are free to use whatever nonsense they can come up with?

Yes, I'm partularly talking about the absurdity of endings (Star Child concept). I reinstalled ME3 not a long time ago, hoping that Extended Cut brought something actually new to the table, but it only expanded on the overall failure of original concept.

Spoiler
 

#2
krukow

krukow
  • Members
  • 3 943 messages
Grammar for the win yo!

#3
Kira Sierra Cyrus

Kira Sierra Cyrus
  • Members
  • 110 messages
>Grammar for the win yo!
Russian here, pardon my spelling errors

Modifié par Kira Sierra Cyrus, 03 janvier 2013 - 01:46 .


#4
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages
Nothing wrong with it, you simply don't like it.

#5
Ironhandjustice

Ironhandjustice
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages
The quality control was destroyed on the rEAper attack.

#6
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Nothing wrong with it, you simply don't like it.


Him and thousands of people. You're always praising BioWare while ignoring the movements like Hold the Line, Demand and Retake ME3. It's not only him. A lot of people still consider those endings to be poorly written, even with the EC.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 01:55 .


#7
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Nothing wrong with it, you simply don't like it.


Him and thousands of people. Don't be so arrogant. You're always praising BioWare while ignoring the movements like Hold the Line, Demand and Retake ME3.

Because those 'movements' are beyond ridiculous.

Why can't I praise Bioware, when they've made a product I really enjoy? ****ing and moaning on here about every little detail is a-okay, but actually saying nice things about the games is 'arrogant'? lol

#8
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages
Yes it is arrogant when you assume that only the OP hated the endings. You love your game so much that you spit on the people who were hurt because of the endings. That is arrogance. Plus, you know nothing about the Retake movement so I'd retire that statement of yours if I were you.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:00 .


#9
EnvyTB075

EnvyTB075
  • Members
  • 3 108 messages
:ph34r:[inappropriate post removed]:ph34r:

Modifié par Ninja Stan, 03 janvier 2013 - 07:22 .


#10
Outsider edge

Outsider edge
  • Members
  • 308 messages
Both sides have their supporters. And too be frank it makes for a lively forumboard. Discussions usually are pretty civil aswell albeit sometimes abit heated but the moderators do a good job keeping excesses in check.

#11
Clayless

Clayless
  • Members
  • 7 051 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Yes it is arrogant when you assume that only the OP hated the endings. You love your game so much that you spit on the people who were hurt because of the endings. That is arrogance. Plus, you know nothing about the Retake movement so I'd retire that statement of yours if I were you.


Retake movement, they gave us the EC and donated 80k to charity. The charity had to stop taking donations when a high number of people asked for their donations back when they realised they weren't paying for a new ending.

So I guess they did achieve two really good things, it was just unfortunately surrounded by so much bad.

#12
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Our_Last_Scene wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...

Yes it is arrogant when you assume that only the OP hated the endings. You love your game so much that you spit on the people who were hurt because of the endings. That is arrogance. Plus, you know nothing about the Retake movement so I'd retire that statement of yours if I were you.


Retake movement, they gave us the EC and donated 80k to charity. The charity had to stop taking donations when a high number of people asked for their donations back when they realised they weren't paying for a new ending.

So I guess they did achieve two really good things, it was just unfortunately surrounded by so much bad.


Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:08 .


#13
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages
A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.

"Oh we're the saviors of gaming! We'll save all you dirty peasants who likes the terrible endings, with our superior and highly sophisticated views!" Laughable.

#14
JamesFaith

JamesFaith
  • Members
  • 2 301 messages
No Quality control can predict subjective impact of story on individual people.

#15
Clayless

Clayless
  • Members
  • 7 051 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.


That pages says:

We are not affiliated with any company or organization. We are grassroots organization fueled by our own individual hearts and pockets.


I don't really see anything that links it to the 63k Retake movement, though you should link it on their facebook.

Modifié par Our_Last_Scene, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:13 .


#16
Robhuzz

Robhuzz
  • Members
  • 4 976 messages
Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D

#17
Femlob

Femlob
  • Members
  • 1 643 messages

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.


Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Brovikk, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.

Modifié par Femlob, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:14 .


#18
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Our_Last_Scene wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...

Right now Retake is focusing on Gamers for Sandy Hook Charities. Which is a pretty good cause.


That pages says:

We are not affiliated with any company or organization. We are grassroots organization fueled by our own individual hearts and pockets.


I don't really see anything that links it to the 63k Retake movement, though you should link it on their facebook.


We aren't affiliated to it, of course. But this doesn't stop us from spreading the word. Demand isn't our headquarters anymore. Most of the serious retakers use the page I posted in my signature. The Log is the better place for the Retake movement and our Admin is encouraging our people to join them.

#19
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages

Femlob wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.


Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Broviik, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.

lolwat

#20
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Femlob wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.


Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Brovikk, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.


This just made my day. :D

#21
EnvyTB075

EnvyTB075
  • Members
  • 3 108 messages

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Femlob wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

A future where gamers have the power to get an ending to a game changed because they don't like it, is not a better future.


Indeed. 'Tis better to suspend all critical thinking and submit to your overlords, peasants. Follow the lead of Brother Broviik, and watch in awe as it gets you absolutely nothing.

lolwat


Its what you promote.

#22
Kira Sierra Cyrus

Kira Sierra Cyrus
  • Members
  • 110 messages

Ironhandjustice wrote...

The quality control was destroyed on the rEAper attack.


The most probable answer, seeing rEApers' work in other areas

#23
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Robhuzz wrote...

Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D


Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.

#24
Kira Sierra Cyrus

Kira Sierra Cyrus
  • Members
  • 110 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Robhuzz wrote...

Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D


Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.


Agreed. btw, is it impossible to get a good Quarian / Geth resolution if I punched Han Gerrel?

#25
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Teddie Sage wrote...

Robhuzz wrote...

Yes, but they only had time to check the Tuchanka and Rannoch storylines:D


Which is pretty sad since those two storylines were kickass. They're the only big moments I can remember from the game, which actually mattered or were perfectly written.


They even made the choices from ME1&2 matter in what you would choose and the options available.

How did they manage to screw so much at the end? It looks like they were indeed trying to torch the franchise.

Punching that idiot doesn´t prevent peace. You must do all side missions and have adm Tali, no idea if something else.

Modifié par Nerevar-as, 03 janvier 2013 - 02:21 .