[quote]Ronnie Blastoff wrote...
What the fudge....... YES IT DOES!!?
It took me what 7 hours to get to level 120.. It took me 7 months to get to 13K!!!
Everyone who is N7 120 Looks like they have only been playing for a small amount of time, since it only takes a small amount of time (in general) for someone to get to N7 120.[/quote]
Of course it's evident of the time you put in, I'm not disputing that. What it does not show is whether you've been playing longer than anyone of another N7 level. You can assume that to be so but that doesn't make it true.
[quote]Which is one of my main points in promoting, I don't want people to think I just started playing yesterday, some people can't tell by weapon loadouts, as stated above with the 2 120s using the pirahna Xs with one literally starting yesterday and another who just chose not to promote. While N7 level CLEARLY says, this person has played at least level 19~20 and went back to 1, this many times.[/quote]
So you're promoting so another player whose views might be as narrow as your own won't make assumptions. But then you do
exactly that.
Sure, the N7 120 could have started yesterday. He could also be playing longer than you. That high N7 could have a crapton of time invested and he can still be a liability rather than an asset. As I said before, I don't make assumptions about it because the results of these assumptions you seem to have I find non-existent. And not in terms of there are exceptions to the rule, in terms of there is no rule.
[quote]

Did you honestly just say that having a higher N7 ranking DOESN"T "
look like" you've been playing longer than someone who just started the game? (not exactly but thats what I'm getting, I'm legitimately asking as well)[/quote]
That is not what I said and thus not what you should be getting. But to answer anyway, failing to see evidence of someone who has just started (lower level gear and weapons) there is no assumption to be made about hours put in at all.
[quote]Again I'm not saying N7 actually means anything, but its a "indication" however small or irrelevant you or anyone else may think, of the experience a person has playing ME3MP. (xbox360, i don't know PC, perhaps it actually DOESNT matter on PC)[/quote]
As explained above, that reasoning is flawed, platform doesn't matter. You simply cannot know how much experience a person has playing this game based on N7 levels over 120. The only exception I've explained to you already.
[quote]
To say that there is no indication is what is grasped from your perspective[/quote]
Yes, that is what I'm saying. Anything 120 or above that doesn't clearly show signs of being new as I stated, can have put any amount of time in the game, and can have any skill and experience level. You can't make assumptions about it. While it's a given that someone who has a high N7 put those hours in, it is not a given that someone with a lower N7 didn't. Case closed.
[quote]I don't state high N7s is being better as fact[/quote]
Your words:
[quote]Ronnie Blastoff wrote...
I can't see a person who
doens't promote having the "skills" to play with a underleveld class
without the above 4/5 things I pointed out (you should always be
headshoting enemies, it doesn't take any skill, but its just wtf are you
doing if you aren't). They don't do it often enough to have any clue
how.[/quote]
You can soften that up to 'they have proof of more experience so better chance for a good game' but that's still wrong.
[quote]I see fruit in high N7 classes, and as stated before, with more casses than not, higher N7s give me a smoother game. I can't rely on someone who choose not to promote to show me different, or should I post, not any longer, Xbox360 doesn't have enough "hidden treasures" to support that. I've spent my earlier months almost every day testing that out.[/quote]
I don't go looking for fruit if there's no way to distinguish what is and what's not. I'll just see what I come upon. And I'm fine with you being selective, what I'm not fine with is you presenting that as facts and anyone who disagrees with them is stupid enough to not see the truth. And when confronted enough you retreat into 'but it's my personal observation, so you can't argue against that'. And then keep on throwing out flawed arguments and blatantly wrong statements and logic to argue your case.
[quote]Now I may be missing out on some great people and great players, sadly,
if they choose not to promote. Its very unlikely I'll ever get the honor. And I'm willing/currently/will continue to accept that.[/quote]
You mean if you choose to be selective. Whatever your flawed reasons for that may be, fine by me and great that you accept that. I don't care in the slightest who you play with, nor should you as long as you have fun.
[quote]And the colors really caught my attention, which is also the reason I use them.

[/quote]
As you might have caught on to, I find it rather annoying. Same as typing in caps lock or repeating a statement numerous times. It doesn't help your case.
[quote]Edit. by the way, I also don't think we see a person as being "a bad" player in the same light, I've played with people who have gotten 50K more points than me on the scoreboard that in actuallity are complete trash players. And players that the lobby wanted to kick from a game afterwards because they constantly died, but that I noticed died because they were the only ones in the midst of enemies thus giving the rest of the squad free roam to fire at enemies without much backfire.
When I say "bad players" i'm not talking about score at the end of the game. I'm talking about how well they "react" to different situations in the game. Alot of people would say a volus isn't that good a character. Thats because from thier perspective voluses don't meet the 'good character" requirements. I on the other hand love getting shield boosted in hack circles and having my entire squad survive because of the blob, i don't care if he/she got 5 points the whole game, long as they did their part.
[/quote]
Funny that you even make assumptions about what I regard as a good or bad player. I don't recall speaking of it.
A good player to me is someone who supports the team, tries to help and contributes in a meaningful way. Place on the scoreboard is irrelevant in that regard. Someone who deals a crapton of damage is nice and all, but not necessarily contributing in other fields and thus not necessarily a good player.
In short, I don't have a problem with what you think or do, I couldn't care less. I have a problem with how you present your case.
Modifié par Sekrev, 06 janvier 2013 - 10:36 .