2 réponses à ce sujet

[aedan901]

Make her more like in the animation, then in DA:2. I really hated how she looked in DA2, too manly for me,but for some reason in the animation she looked hawt...
Do you want to see Cassandra redesigned or do you want her to be more like in DA2 ?

Modifié par aedan901, 06 janvier 2013 - 12:30 .

[David Gaider]

LobselVith8 wrote...
I think that would be good enough for me. I think companions should be optional.

As always, some companions will be optional and some will not.

I doubt pro-templar or pro-Chantry companions would follow someone who went against their ethical and moral views, and vice versa.

I'd warn against leaping to conclusions about the context of what you will and will not be doing, and how potential companions might or might not be associating with you. It won't stop you, as it never has, but you're undoubtedly building yourself up to disappointment.

[David Gaider]

LobselVith8 wrote...
I'd say most of the discussion in this specific forum focuses on hypothetical discussion, as opposed to leaping to conclusions.

That sounds fine. I get the impression sometimes from threads like this that such things are expectations and not hypothetical discussions.

The example of a pro-templar or pro-Chantry companion was simply an example of how I don't think that a companion would work with a protagonist who went against their moral or ethical code.

Depending on what you're allowed to express in-game, as well as the context of your relationship with that companion, certainly.

I suppose I could have used the example of Fenris: I genuinely don't see why Fenris would associate with a pro-slavery Hawke, who not only explicitly endorsed slavery, but kept Orana as a slave.

It caused a big rivalry jump (perhaps the biggest, I forget), but I don't think it would be a deal-breaker for him as you seem to. But so be it.