The RPGenius wrote...
So basically, you're mostly just sick of seeing people make legitimate arguments. Thank God we've got you here to give us a break from all that.
Looks like someone doesn't want to give up their mindless buzzwords.
The RPGenius wrote...
So basically, you're mostly just sick of seeing people make legitimate arguments. Thank God we've got you here to give us a break from all that.
Legbiter wrote...
Good OP, I agree. Many of the fans here read like they are on some sort of medication. But a forum like this is always going to draw out the cranks and monomaniacs.
EnvyTB075 wrote...
Just bear in mind that Seival loves Synthesis to the core, and would love to be a Banshee irl.
-snip-
deatharmonic wrote...
The audacity of the OP and some posters here amazes me. How can anyone say someones opinion isn't valid? You cannot attribute validity to opinions, they're not measurable in a way where by you can say what is right and what is wrong. It's some what of a farce to decide upon the legitimacy of an opinion.
anorling wrote...
That is great and all Yate. But I hate ME3 because of the following reasons:So if Bioware keeps going like this ME4 will just be a mindless shooter.
- My choices didn't matter
- Too much space magic
- Destroy is the only true ending. So why was Synthesis favoured?
- Kai Leng was forced and contrived
xsdob wrote...
deatharmonic wrote...
The audacity of the OP and some posters here amazes me. How can anyone say someones opinion isn't valid? You cannot attribute validity to opinions, they're not measurable in a way where by you can say what is right and what is wrong. It's some what of a farce to decide upon the legitimacy of an opinion.
About the same way someone who hates the endings and game can claim that someone who likes something is invalid.
You know, what happens all the time on these forums.
xsdob wrote...
^ But that is against human nature. We think emotionally, and the more powerful our emotion is, the more we forsake civility in order to facilitate that emotions hold on our language and thoughts.
Personally I view this thread as part of an equilibrium process. So many threads have been made like this one for one side, that the other side creates their own in order to combat and find balance with those threads.
It doesn't work, but it is bound to happen.
Seboist wrote...
The "choices" in ME are as meaningful as whether or not Aerith gets a flower in FF7 or choosing to play a white or a black shepard.
Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...
You know, the contrast between this thread, which is basically targeting a sizable portion of the posts made on BSN, and David's thread, which simply links to a blog post about a Dev's stance on the forums, is so stark and paradoxical (the one that opens with an attack generates mild responses and pseudo-constructive discussion while the thread that opens completely passively generates a storm of bickering and fighting) as to be downright perplexing. But, hey, this is BSN we're talking about.