188 réponses à ce sujet

[BACON4BREAKFAST]

As an individual game, and just for entertainment purposes, yes the multiplayer was better for me. But I still would rather have played the ME single player trilogy than played the multiplayer on ME3.

[Big Bad]

For me, enduring 1 million sync kills is infinitely better than enduring 10 minutes of the StarBrat, so yes I would say that MP is better than SP.

[Doni]

I hate to admit it, but yeah there's no denying I've played A LOT more of multiplayer than singleplayer.

But as a result, I don't see Mass Effect 3 as a story-driven singleplayer game anymore. I now see it as a really shoddily done multiplayer game that somehow is really addicting (I'm blaming the random unlock buying system). I'm certain if I wasn't such a completionist I would've gotten bored after max 2 or 3 months of playing.

[Schneidend]

None of the fun of MP can compare to some of the gripping stuff in the SP. I was on the verge of tears at least three separate times in SP and hooted like a jackass when I gutted Kai Leng like a fish.

[ReprovedReaper]

while I like most other players bought the game for the conclusion to Shepard story however I have spent a lot more time playing multiplayer. I would not have played the this much of it weren't for the MP

[_sigge_]

Haven't even finished SP. I loved 1 and 2, but 3 felt like a grind, and then I discovered MP

[Catastrophy]

I'm reluctant to say the SP isn't as good as MP. Storytelling and simply shooting up things don't compare well.
But if it wasn't for the MP-part I wouldn't still be here and moved on to another game.

I enjoyed and frowned about the story, but the MP has shown me how cool the combat gameplay really is.

[darkpassenger2342]

Me3 just didnt feel different in multiple playthroughs like me2 did, some reasons obvious and some not..
that better change in the next one!! It was even somewhat linear.. they know that the people that really love these games are going to play most of the classes, it just needs to be worthy of our attention spans.

Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 07 janvier 2013 - 08:51 .

[Eelectrica]

without mp, this game would be long gone from my hdd.
So yeah the MP devs haved saved me3

[VerySeed]

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

Me3 just didnt feel different in multiple playthroughs like me2 did, some reasons obvious and some not..
that better change in the next one!!.they know that the people that really love these games are going to play most of the classes, it just needs to be worthy of our attention spans.

This. Did my first playthrough as an adept when 200% cooldown was all the hype. Managed a second one as a vanguard. Then tried to do one as an infiltrator and i found myself wanting to skip all the cutscenes and the dialog because it felt like the same sh*t all over again, and got very boring, very fast.

[ZoneOfNibiru]

I haven't touched sp since I started playing mp. For me, it's the wider variety of gameplay you get with all the different characters and classes. You can be an invisible sword weilding phantom in one match and when you get bored of that, you can be a biotic or a grenade spamming engineer. In sp, you pick a class and you're stuck with it the rest of the game unless you mod your save, and even then, there's a lot of cool powers that aren't in sp.

I'm probably only halfway through sp, but so far it just doesn't have the same feeling that 1 and 2 had. There's definitely some improvements and things I liked, but overall it seems to be the worst of the series.

[L.ast L.ife]

Big Bad wrote...

infinitely better.

[Ziegrif]

MP is keeping me pretty well from ever touching SP.
So yes.

[Agonized Orphan]

Eelectrica wrote...

without mp, this game would be long gone from my hdd.
So yeah the MP devs haved saved me3

Yeah i couldnt agree more ! 

[FlowCytometry]

1.5 SP playthroughs vs. 2470 MP matches played.

Hm, I think I prefer not sleeping. Runner up is MP though.

[GodLovesATrier]

My 2nd SP playthrough lies abandoned after I discovered MP.

[CapnCruuunch]

L.ast L.ife wrote...

Big Bad wrote...

infinitely better.

Ziegrif wrote...

MP is keeping me pretty well from ever touching SP.
So yes.

I love MP, and have logged more hours in that than SP for sure. So bear that in mind when I say:

If you are content playing horde mode over and over again, I'm not really sure whether your opinion on a story driven RPG is relevent.

I like both. MP was a surprise success and has give ME3 massive replayability. I still think the SP experience was excellent.

[Guglio08]

I don't think so. I played the MP demo, but I still bought the ME3 CE. Because I care more about the story and the characters than the MP. My only complaint is that the MP made the SP combat too easy.

[36812180234]

Well, I have bought the Leviathan and Omega the first day they were released but did not tried them yet. Because I like playing multiplayer. Guess that is an answer. The ending of SP is **** anyway, and I still have a hope it will be fixed somehow. Considering MP, I would like to have more campaigns.

By the way, I could imagine the addition to MP where you could spend some money you honestly earned in battle. Like the Afterlife (with the dancers and all the stuff) and shops for guns and consumables...

[Zorinho20_CRO]

It is a different experience.Although MP is more intense than SP,I enjoy story of SP.

[ArcaptSSX]

I only did the SP campaign once, and no interest to do a second one (with another ME1=>2 imported character) until all DLCs have been published.
On the other hand i have 500+ hours in MP which i regret i so blatantly ignored from march to august(so many missed out promo weapons, or nerfs butthurts).

Would still buy ME3 only for the SP experience though. It's a more than enjoyable space opera. And i love space operas.

Modifié par JohnBobbyTheThird, 07 janvier 2013 - 09:45 .

[Ziegrif]

CapnCruuunch wrote...

L.ast L.ife wrote...

Big Bad wrote...

infinitely better.

Ziegrif wrote...

MP is keeping me pretty well from ever touching SP.
So yes.

I love MP, and have logged more hours in that than SP for sure. So bear that in mind when I say:

If you are content playing horde mode over and over again, I'm not really sure whether your opinion on a story driven RPG is relevent.

I like both. MP was a surprise success and has give ME3 massive replayability. I still think the SP experience was excellent.

Everyones opinion is always relevant if they played the game through.
I did. I experienced the whole trilogy for the story.
The combat in ME3 hooked me and I was disappointed in what the SP side can provide in terms of difficulty.
MP fixed this.
The only reason why I haven't played the SP side more is pretty much because I lost most of my ME2 saves and haven't bothered going back to 1 or 2 because the combat isn't as hooking as 3.
Story driven or not, ME3 has a huge emphasis on combat.

Plus many people thought that the story wasn't even that good because of the pay off.

[Amusingthree93]

Until I watched the ending, SP was better than MP.
After I watched the ending, MP became better.

Seriously the ending was unfulfilling enough that I felt the only way to get my money's worth was to play MP.

[palmof40sorrows]

tagamaynila wrote...

Yep. Just from the amount of fun I've had, SP simply does not measure up to MP.

Never thought I'd play a MP game, never thought I'd buy a headset, never thought I'd be into a MP experience. Now it's my favorite thing. I even think that hour wise I've now put more time into MP than I did in SP, even considering 7 play throughs total.

[Alisira]

R0binME wrote...

the SP really pulled a U-turn in ME3. Great SP in both ME1 and ME2, both gameplay, difficulty and roleplaying. ME3 was worse in all three categories, not to mention the ending.
MP really saved the game from being a complete fiasco.