Aller au contenu

Photo

Honest question to Chris Priestly


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
288 réponses à ce sujet

#1
draconian139

draconian139
  • Members
  • 391 messages
Are we allowed to discuss thread topics from an indoctrination perspective as long as its restrained to that particular topic? 

If not, you're really going against that whole IT is a valid interpretation line that we've been told for months...if it was never considered a valid interpretation this shouldn't have been said.

Note:If you had PMs open I'd simply PM you but you don't so this is the only way I could think to ask.

#2
Ithurael

Ithurael
  • Members
  • 3 181 messages
Can you not PM him?

#3
InfinitaMortem

InfinitaMortem
  • Members
  • 8 messages
I don't think so, it seems they want indoctrination (and everything related to it) out of the forums, pal.

#4
The Geth Spectre

The Geth Spectre
  • Members
  • 155 messages
Your suppose to make groups for it.

#5
Liamv2

Liamv2
  • Members
  • 19 033 messages
He said to make a group because the IT thread had too many pages

#6
Gixxer6Rdr

Gixxer6Rdr
  • Members
  • 297 messages
Quick answer...

LOCKDOWN!!

#7
TheRealJayDee

TheRealJayDee
  • Members
  • 2 950 messages

Ithurael wrote...

Can you not PM him?


Nope.

#8
IC-07

IC-07
  • Members
  • 628 messages
Lockdown imminent

#9
TheRealJayDee

TheRealJayDee
  • Members
  • 2 950 messages

IC-07 wrote...

Lockdown imminent


I'd say deletion. It's more thorough.

#10
Ithurael

Ithurael
  • Members
  • 3 181 messages
the group idea seems like a better thought, it is just that the mechanics of the group discussions are aweful...

#11
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 806 messages

Ithurael wrote...

Can you not PM him?


Actually no, you cant.

#12
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages
We should demand better group mechanics then...

#13
Priss Blackburne

Priss Blackburne
  • Members
  • 590 messages
The IT thread has been less and less about IT theory and more about just chating with each other. Everything has been analyzed and discussed to death allready.

It's basically like it's own group anyways at the moment as it feels more like a chatroom then a discussion about IT.

edit: I'm not necessarly agreeing with it but I can understand the reasoning behind it

Modifié par Priss Blackburne, 07 janvier 2013 - 09:24 .


#14
clennon8

clennon8
  • Members
  • 2 163 messages

byne wrote...

Ithurael wrote...

Can you not PM him?


Actually no, you cant.

Yeah, I tried to PM him earlier.  Can't do it.

#15
Femlob

Femlob
  • Members
  • 1 643 messages

Are we allowed to discuss thread topics from an indoctrination perspective as long as its restrained to that particular topic?


The better question would be what we are allowed to discuss down here; that list grows shorter by the day.

#16
KneeTheCap

KneeTheCap
  • Members
  • 580 messages

Priss Blackburne wrote...

The IT thread has been less and less about IT theory and more about just chating with each other. Everything has been analyzed and discussed to death allready.

It's basically like it's own group anyways at the moment as it feels more like a chatroom then a discussion about IT.

 

Well yes, but how does that not allow the creation of a new one? Surely there are things to discuss with that theory?

#17
draconian139

draconian139
  • Members
  • 391 messages

Priss Blackburne wrote...

The IT thread has been less and less about IT theory and more about just chating with each other. Everything has been analyzed and discussed to death allready.

It's basically like it's own group anyways at the moment as it feels more like a chatroom then a discussion about IT.


Yes, hence my question about whether we can discuss the specific topic in a thread from an IT perspective.  This really is unclear to me at the moment.

#18
clennon8

clennon8
  • Members
  • 2 163 messages
I mentioned indoctrination in my religious symbolism thread. No lockdown. Take what you will from that.

#19
Rosstoration

Rosstoration
  • Members
  • 351 messages
Lived reckless so long
Justice system bust me wrong
Future's stretched out like a rubber check
Don't be jeffin' out the side of yo neck
Dealin' from the bottom of the deck
Might make it home to the projects
Don't point no finger at me like you do
Know three of them is pointing back at you
Locked down, locked down!
Ah, ah, ah, ah
Ah, ah, ah, ah

Modifié par Rosstoration, 07 janvier 2013 - 09:26 .


#20
PanzerGr3nadier

PanzerGr3nadier
  • Members
  • 403 messages

Ithurael wrote...

Can you not PM him?


 I tried that about 1h ago.... no response

Because

The Geth Spectre wrote...

Your suppose to make groups for it.



#21
clarkusdarkus

clarkusdarkus
  • Members
  • 2 460 messages
The best 4 threads as of late have all been lockdowned

1. Boss's are too videogamey
2. IT theory mark 3
3. Losing trust in bioware
4. Dragon age dev about bsn

Seems they're cherry picking, as alot of good feedback was in those threads but typical
Bioware and focus on the negative aspect of the fanbase......i see synthesis threads remain as it caters to there agenda....

#22
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 779 messages

Femlob wrote...

Are we allowed to discuss thread topics from an indoctrination perspective as long as its restrained to that particular topic?


The better question would be what we are allowed to discuss down here; that list grows shorter by the day.


here is a list

"what you love about ME3“

that is all

#23
Kesak12

Kesak12
  • Members
  • 600 messages

Restrider wrote...

We should demand better group mechanics then...



#24
InfinitaMortem

InfinitaMortem
  • Members
  • 8 messages
Hey Panzer, your thread "Moderation on BSN" got locked down right? I can't get in.

#25
KneeTheCap

KneeTheCap
  • Members
  • 580 messages
Really, tell me it's a good thing totally outlaw a subject that is closely tied to the game and its lore? I mean threads get deleted left and right because of the mere mention of the word. It's not a political debate, it's not a religious argument. It's a theme in this game, yet it's forbidden to discuss.

Does not compute.