882 réponses à ce sujet

[saMoorai]

I'd be happy with being able to wear plate armor, and use a crossbow.

[LPPrince]

That would make sense.

[saMoorai]

I'm a simple man, with simple pleasures.

[LPPrince]

Simple tastes.

[LPPrince]

I hope arrows hit harder. I hope the sound of the string being released sounds right too.

[filetemo]

archery is warrior-ey, not roguer-ey. Because archery is not backstabby, it's "I destroy you from afar till you are close enough and then when you think you have me I switch to my two hander and slice your arms and behead you" style.

My english is winrar, I know

[LPPrince]

That makes perfect sense, with the bow being on the warrior's back and the two handed sword...being...on the warrior's...back...

Yeah its for rogues. Warriors too, but handled a bit differently.

[filetemo]

LPPrince wrote...

That makes perfect sense, with the bow being on the warrior's back and the two handed sword...being...on the warrior's...back...

Yeah its for rogues. Warriors too, but handled a bit differently.

Why not? I can have a one handed sword sheathed in my hip, a dagger in the other hip and a shield tied to my chesthair:wub:

[LPPrince]

Riiight.

I miss saM.

[Am1vf]

filetemo wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

That makes perfect sense, with the bow being on the warrior's back and the two handed sword...being...on the warrior's...back...

Yeah its for rogues. Warriors too, but handled a bit differently.

Why not? I can have a one handed sword sheathed in my hip, a dagger in the other hip and a shield tied to my chesthair

That has to hurt.

[LPPrince]

Logic.

[happy_daiz]

LPPrince wrote...

That makes perfect sense, with the bow being on the warrior's back and the two handed sword...being...on the warrior's...back...

Yeah its for rogues. Warriors too, but handled a bit differently.

In Skyrim, literally all of my characters use a bow, even my mages, so to me, it seems like any class can and should be able to use a bow. Even my Orc or Nord two-handers.

Kind of like how anyone should be able to open chests, disarm traps, or use poisons. Limiting a class's secondary weapons or tactics has always left me scratching my head.

Again, I'm jaded, biased, spoiled, swayed, fill in the blank. 

Modifié par happy_daiz, 09 août 2013 - 12:54 .

[LPPrince]

Juice.

[saMoorai]

LPPrince wrote...

Riiight.

I miss saM.

I miss me too.

[LPPrince]

Something about crossbows?

[saMoorai]

LPPrince wrote...

That makes perfect sense, with the bow being on the warrior's back and the two handed sword...being...on the warrior's...back...

Yeah its for rogues. Warriors too, but handled a bit differently.

Yeah, Archery fits for both classes rather equally. Bows fit more with a rogueish type, and Crossbows fit more with a soldier-warrior type.

[LPPrince]

I reaaaaally want to know what they're planning on that front.

[saMoorai]

Seriously, if they announce that Archery is returning for Warriors, and they can use crossbows, I will get into full on excited mode for this game.

[LPPrince]

Not quite there yet?

[saMoorai]

Thats literally the only thing keeping me from it. Granted, I'm really interested in it, but I need mah crossbow wielding warriors to get hyped.

[LPPrince]

So if everything works out but thats not in...

[saMoorai]

I will be hella Salty.

[LPPrince]

Damn.

Well, I'm hoping.

[saMoorai]

Agreed.

Also: The thought dawned on me of the possibility of playing as Crossbow wielding Kossith Warrior.

The image was beautiful.

[LPPrince]

That does sound pretty cool. Dunno if I'd do it, since I prefer long over cross.