NO
Player won't know any detail about Mass Effect Trilogy especially aliens if it's just a MP. However, it'll give us more awesome experience (better) than other FPS games, COD Black Ops, BF3, MOHWF which I don't really like.
Would anyone else be interested in ME3MP becoming its own game?
Débuté par
Silvair
, janv. 13 2013 12:25
Retour en haut
#102
Posté 03 février 2013 - 10:22
PaperAlien
-
- Members
- 2 454 messages
Consoles would explode so no. ME3 vs BF3 (where one team uses mass effect characters and the other battlefield player characters) would be fun, listening to BF3 players complaining about overpowered biotics would be amusing.
#104
Posté 03 février 2013 - 06:21
Kushiel42
-
- Members
- 425 messages
Silvair wrote...
and COMPLETELY broken since the mass effect powers would have to be overhauled to the point they don't even resemble the originals anymore to be otherwise lol.
There really aren't that many powers that would need massive overhauls to work in a PvP environment.
Sungularity
Lash (maybe)
Stasis
Submission Net
Pull
Lift Grenade (maybe)
That's it.
Modifié par Kushiel42, 03 février 2013 - 06:21 .
#106
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:14
DJ Airsurfer
-
- Members
- 2 548 messages
lfc19titles wrote...
ME can become like call of duty if they do the next game very well, they can really make it a yearly or 2 year game at a time imo
You deserve to die for that comment. Do you know how ****ing ****ty it makes games if you **** a new one out every year? Do you want that to happen to ME? Become the same recycled bull**** every year? Because I don't.
Now pls go away.
#107
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:16
A4RiZ0812
-
- Members
- 678 messages
I like op's thinking, I'd be up for it. Perhaps the mp could be a download only? the normal game on disc and a discount if you purchase both.
Only problem is the ea servers, could they handle it?????
Only problem is the ea servers, could they handle it?????
#108
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:17
k1ngl1ves
-
- Members
- 6 659 messages
I would buy ME4 MP if it was a stand alone game. In fact, I'm hoping it is. I'm only interested in the mp now anyways. I haven't bought any sp dlc since the free extended ending debacle. SP has run it's course for me.
#109
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:18
Solmanian
-
- Members
- 1 744 messages
ME3MP is "all the fun of mass effect, without that pesky plot!". Mass effect 1-3 are OK shooters. Not great shooters. The MP removes the most importent part of the game. The only reason I play is because I can play as other races; some thing that I was dissapointed wasn't in the SP game. If it were only human charecters I wouldn't have played it.
#110
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:26
N7Kopper
-
- Members
- 4 386 messages
Someone seems butthurt that a game series that they personally don't like is popular...DJ Airsurfer wrote...
You deserve to die for that comment. Do you know how ****ing ****ty it makes games if you **** a new one out every year? Do you want that to happen to ME? Become the same recycled bull**** every year? Because I don't.
Now pls go away.
I'd rather do it with Gears of War 3. Both games use the same engine, after all.PaperAlien wrote...
ME3 vs BF3 (where one team uses mass effect characters and the other battlefield player characters) would be fun, listening to BF3 players complaining about overpowered biotics would be amusing.
Oh, how utterly hilarious it would be to bust in on a Ranked match with, hmm... the Phoenix adept, I'll pick. With a Kroguard buddy. Oh, you're wallbouncing toward me to get me with your Gnasher? HOMING LASH! KROGAN BIOTIC CHARGE! Wham, BAM, the Locust team is all dead. No dodging. And then for the COGs - I might trap half of them in a Singularity, and then hit them with a light melee shock stick or headbutt to down them (you have 300 HP in Gears) and just run around taunting them until they get up - then just headshot them. How's that for overpowered?
#111
Posté 04 février 2013 - 01:56
GreatBlueHeron
-
- Members
- 1 490 messages
Yes, I'd pay 60 on a pve stand alone...I've spent over 200 on packs for me3 mp. I just don't get what's so fun about pvp. The one one who has the best loadout wins? Meh. More co op with more maps of various sizes, environments (water, zero g, earthquakes, strong winds, etc.), enemy modes and objectives.SSuicideKKing666 wrote...
The only game I can think of that is all PvE is borderlands, and that game is built on dynamic hunts. PvP is the biggest selling feature of most games and is the most effective way to gain funding and playerbase (more funding)
And would you pay $60 for just horde mode PvE content?
#112
Posté 04 février 2013 - 02:39
DJ Airsurfer
-
- Members
- 2 548 messages
N7Kopper wrote...
Someone seems butthurt that a game series that they personally don't like is popular...DJ Airsurfer wrote...
You deserve to die for that comment. Do you know how ****ing ****ty it makes games if you **** a new one out every year? Do you want that to happen to ME? Become the same recycled bull**** every year? Because I don't.
Now pls go away.
Naw, someone knows the word butthurt. How cute.
And no, I'm not butthurt. I just don't want ME to be some piece of ass game series that releases the same recycled games (and same overpriced DLCs to those games) each and every year.
Oh, I don't like CoD because it's popular? Wrong. I don't care jack sh!t if it's popular or not. I don't like it because it has always been, is and always will be sh!t. (The community is sh!t as well.)
