106 réponses à ce sujet

[Ghost]

MrDizaztar wrote...

Star Fox Assault for the GCN.

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Ridwan]

Hyperglide wrote...

M25105 wrote...

Hyperglide wrote...

About 99% of people posting in this thread don't know what 'score low' means.

Well aren't you the life of the party.

I'll be DJing for tonight.  No Rihanna.  

Also I did participate, not hatin'.  Go see my orignal post.  But how are games scored in the 70's and 80's not a great game?  Usually anything in the 90's or above is considered a classic.  

Again I ask what is considered a low score?  Didn't get a sufficient answer to my query.  This thread has no direction.  Are we talking a game that scored lower than you think it deserved or a game that is scored as a truly bad game and is not?

I got no clue what any of these games that the others posted scored, I trust their judgement however. In regards to my own post, Serious Sam 3 scored 6/10 on gamespot. That's a score given to mediocre games. I found that completely idiotic, especially after I watched/read the review on the site.
A game that's hardcore nonstop action, with old school playstyle is scored lower than what it actually deserves. People read such BS and trust the site and thinks it's true. Watch how the reviewer on gamespot plays it, it's fairly obvious that A: He has no clue, and B: Considering how fast the enemy dies and how little damage he takes, he's playing probably on Easy or Tourist.

I invite anyone to try out Serious Sam 3 if you're sick and tired of modern military shooters that tries to feed you with some bull**** nonsense story that's suppose to make us care about war (I can ask my father or turn on the news or read Chomsky for that), that's on rails (it's a freaking QTE in some cases), regens HP, forced scripted events, constant cutscenes, two weapon carry limit, then Serious Sam 3 is just the game for you.

What's funny is that crap like the Modern Warfare singleplayer is called "the thinking mans" fps. Yeah, there's much thinking when all you have to do is press for "Awesome stuff exploding".

[Fiery Phoenix]

Don't know if it has been mentioned, but definitely Mirror's Edge. I think it averaged ~75% but it was an amazing experience through and through.

Probably a few more titles that aren't occurring to me right now as well. I'd say DA2 was better than most made it out to be, but it certainly wasn't "great".

[Naughty Bear]

Fiery Phoenix wrote...

Don't know if it has been mentioned, but definitely Mirror's Edge. I think it averaged ~75% but it was an amazing experience through and through.

Probably a few more titles that aren't occurring to me right now as well. I'd say DA2 was better than most made it out to be, but it certainly wasn't "great".

I thought Mirror's Edge got a higher socre than that.

Mirror's Edge is an amazing experience. I want a sequel but I really don't want EA doing it.

[Fiery Phoenix]

I think it just averaged around that; its individual scores were a bit all over the place from what I remember. The same thing seems to be happening with Dead Space 3 at the moment, funnily enough.

[Sajuro]

Wet