swjobson wrote...
Bessy067 wrote...
swjobson wrote...
RoundedPlanet88 wrote...
swjobson wrote...
buthane22 wrote...
Male quarian soldier with full passive and TS specced correcly has a better damage output.
And for Argus, Stability and piercing is pretty much mandatory imo.
But you're right about it being better than the harrier, tough Harrier is full auto, which is great.
MQS lacks improved RoF and accuracy. Full auto makes Harrier less accurate, not to mention the low amount of spare ammo.
Marksman? you heard of that ability?
GI, you know, with the giant Damage boost from tac cloak, and the RoF and accuracy boosts from hunter mode, AND the passives?
Did you actually crunch the numbers with anythingelse to prove yourself right, or did you just crunch the numbers for your current build?
Numbers without comparison numbers really don`t mean anything.
The lag between using Scan and Marksman and between waiting for Marksman to expire/cooldown and another Scan interfers with attacking. It's a terrible kit. The Geth Inf only gets a Cloak bonus that would benefit the first two or three Argus bursts, ruining sustained damage.
With proxy mine and hunter mode I'm pretty sure GI does more damage than destroyer anyways.
No. I've tried all of these things. The worst part is when you miss with the mine (including enemy evading your placement), or time spent getting closer to improve your mine accuracy. The Destroyer just shoots the gun; simple and effective.
DM + destroyer passive = 57.5% damage buff, max 35% bigger magazine, max 25% accuracy bonus, max 25% RoF bonus. Hunter mode, proxy mine an geth passive gives 60% bonus damage (70 if using a geth weapon), 15% bonus accuracy, 15% faster RoF and 10% faster movement speed, as well as the ability to see enemies through walls/smoke. That doesn't include the extra 80% damage from cloak. GI does more damage, and seeing as you can't get all those bonuses out of DM anyways I'd say GI is the better weapons platform even before cloak.
Retour en haut
[Violation of Rule #6 removed]
