Aller au contenu

Photo

Why wasn't Shepard Indoctrinated?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
335 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

Aaleel wrote...

I wonder if the Catalyst had never walked out and everyone had just fought through the Citadel to the council chamber and pressed a button to destroy the reapers would you hear anything about an IT, or ME3 being Shepard's fight against indoctrination.  NOPE.

Probably wouldn't see as many threads about conventional victory either.


Of course we wouldn't, because if that were the ending, then the ending wouldn't be indoctrination :pinched:


Fun fact: Still not indoctrination.

Core conflict. Scope of the Narrative. Revelation. Bookends. Four good reasons IT is not true. If you ask, I'll elaborate.

#102
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages
IT has all of those.

#103
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

IT has all of those.


Perhaps, but ME3 has different ones.

#104
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

Indy_S wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

IT has all of those.


Perhaps, but ME3 has different ones.


IT is just ME3 through a different lens. Or for some people, the default way to view it.

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 16 janvier 2013 - 01:31 .


#105
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages
Apparently a kaleidoscope because anything that produces a coherent image causes a 'meh' or worse reaction. What you're taking from the narrative is remarkably optimistic in the face that ending.

#106
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

Indy_S wrote...

Apparently a kaleidoscope because anything that produces a coherent image causes a 'meh' or worse reaction. What you're taking from the narrative is remarkably optimistic in the face that ending.


That's the thing though, the way I see it there is no bad writing and never was any bad writing, it's not "in the face of that ending".

What you call IT, I call ME3. That's what I saw the first time I played, without any outside information.


Mass Effect 3 is a steak, but some people expected a hamburger. Some people realise it's a steak, while others think it's just a crappy hamburger. They complain there's no bun or condiments without realising that those shouldn't be there and aren't needed.

EC was created by Bioware throwing a bun and ketchup on a steak. While it's still a steak, it's now harder to tell, but it's not much less crappy as a hamburger than it was before.

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 16 janvier 2013 - 01:44 .


#107
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages
But if IT was true, wouldn't you're signature be false? The fate of the Reapers isn't in doubt in IT, they live regardless of your choice. Apparently, the game wasn't about the conflict of the Galaxy versus the Reapers. The game was about Shepard versus Indoctrination. So your sig would be:

Shep dies / Shep dies / Shep lives sometimes / Shep dies

Some people think it's crumbs, others delude themselves it's a loaf.

The EC was just more crumbs.

Modifié par Indy_S, 16 janvier 2013 - 01:44 .


#108
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

Indy_S wrote...

But if IT was true, wouldn't you're signature be false? The fate of the Reapers isn't in doubt in IT, they live regardless of your choice. Apparently, the game wasn't about the conflict of the Galaxy versus the Reapers. The game was about Shepard versus Indoctrination. So your sig would be:

Shep dies / Shep dies / Shep lives sometimes / Shep dies


My sig is more a reminder to Shepard when he's in the decision chamber, Shepard doesn't know he's not in reality.

#109
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages
Sorry for the late response. 'Had to walk the doggy.

Eryri wrote...

HYR 2.0 wrote...

Two days and a week are not exactly close.

That's
to say nothing of the fact Shepard thwarts the Reapers' attempted
sabotage of The Project, and that Shepard's involvement in the events of
Arrival is not canon in a new ME3 game.

Bioware can't make it take any less than 1 day without greviously contradicting established lore.


I
don't think it would be too much of a problem for them. The established
lore is vague, perheps deliberately so. They left themselves plenty of
wiggle room. If we knew that indoctrination took exactly this much time at exactly this much distance from a reaper, it would rob it of its mystery and make it far less frightening.


It isn't exact, but even so, there's a general guideline of ~ days-to-weeks. It's there. It has been for all three games.

And then there's the fact it didn't happen. Otherwise, Shepard wouldn't have destroyed the Alpha Relay.



As
has been said before, Shepard has been clocking up little bits of
exposure all over the place. The very fact that the process takes time,
strongly suggests that it is cumulative, even if it doesn't outright
prove it and there is nothing in the lore to directly prove that it is
not, so it seems a safe assumption.


Apologies, but I do not find that assumption to be safe.

Rana's
example shows that once a latent indoctrination has taken root it is
self sustaining, and can manifest years later - it is almost like a
cancer in that regard. One cigarette won't kill you, but smoke enough
over the years... While other people can smoke like chimneys and end up
dying of something completely unrelated.


Again, I do not believe indoctrination "builds up." If Rana was indoctrinated, IMO, it means she was indoctrinated on Virmire.


Leviathan
itself asserts that Indoctrination is a refined and perfected version
of enthrallment. As to why they were able to knock a Sovereign class
reaper out of the sky, I'll admit that strained my credulity (how on
Earth did the Catalyst defeat them if they were able to do things like
that?) 
However, while disabling the reaper, they were using their
orbs as ampilfiers. Perhaps they have been doing their own research into
enhancing their natural abilities during their long exile from power.


Again, I find it hard to draw any parallels between their control techniques, given how little we know of Leviathan's.

Also
Harbinger is capable of directly manipulating the collectors even from
outside the galaxy - which seems very similar to enthrallment.


The Collectors are loaded with synthetic implants.


Eryri wrote...

Shepard isn't really kneeling down. He's still sitting in the Atlas. Leviathan deliberately put him in that position in the illusion to symbolically express his dominance over Shepard.


My interpretation is a bit different.

I think Shepard -- in that medium -- is in the position he would be in if he were standing, not seated inside the mech.


That's not even the most obvious similarity. "Your memories give voice to our words". Leviathan uses the images of people Shepard knows; Bryson, Garneau etc. He even uses props - an representation of a microscope.

The catalyst also borrows images from Shepard's mind - the boy from Vancouver. This is true even in the literal interpretation, but taken with the added context of Leviathan it becomes more significant.


Again, I have a different interpretation.

The catalyst, like Vigil, changes his output to something the user can readily make sense of. The audio output is English, the visual output is *something* on Shepard's mind.

The kid is symbolism for everyone Shepard couldn't save. The Crucible is not firing before Shepard passes out.

#110
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

Maybe it is so because these are the cases where they needed to show Shepard weak and down?


That's what I go with, personally.

#111
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages
The worst part is that when he wakes up, Shepard gets to talk to TIM again. Apparently, even the minor antagonist hasn't been dealt with. No resolution to that conflict, either. I suppose Anderson is also alive, though, so that's something. I'm really looking forward to the next game where Shepard picks himself up, dusts himself off and gets shot by a Reaper.

I really like how the "Take Earth back" is played off in the final scene. With IT, you only take back two blocks and then there's rubble. Absolutely stunning how well that goes.

Modifié par Indy_S, 16 janvier 2013 - 01:55 .


#112
Aaleel

Aaleel
  • Members
  • 4 427 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

Aaleel wrote...

I wonder if the Catalyst had never walked out and everyone had just fought through the Citadel to the council chamber and pressed a button to destroy the reapers would you hear anything about an IT, or ME3 being Shepard's fight against indoctrination.  NOPE.

Probably wouldn't see as many threads about conventional victory either.


Of course we wouldn't, because if that were the ending, then the ending wouldn't be indoctrination :pinched:


It people are saying the theme of the game is Shepard's fight against indoctrination, wouldn't that still be the theme whether or not the final scene involved the Catalyst?  Unless we're saying this whole premise is validated by the showing up of the Catalyst,

#113
Aaleel

Aaleel
  • Members
  • 4 427 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

One of the comics references Shepard doing Arrival. Arrival is canon and doing a playthrough without it is non-canon.

 

So something outside the game supersedes something that happens in the actual game for the purposes of the games story?  I'm sorry, just no.  If Bioware wanted it to be canon they would have made it cannon, just like Liara becoming the shadow broker, or TIM getting his hands on stuff from the collector base.

bioware wrote an entirely different set of circumstances into the game or Hackett sending space Marines to do the deed.  Arrival happening in canon, Shepard doing the relay destruction however is not.  

#114
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

HYR 2.0 wrote...

As
has been said before, Shepard has been clocking up little bits of
exposure all over the place. The very fact that the process takes time,
strongly suggests that it is cumulative, even if it doesn't outright
prove it and there is nothing in the lore to directly prove that it is
not, so it seems a safe assumption.


Apologies, but I do not find that assumption to be safe.

Rana's
example shows that once a latent indoctrination has taken root it is
self sustaining, and can manifest years later - it is almost like a
cancer in that regard. One cigarette won't kill you, but smoke enough
over the years... While other people can smoke like chimneys and end up
dying of something completely unrelated.


Again, I do not believe indoctrination "builds up." If Rana was indoctrinated, IMO, it means she was indoctrinated on Virmire.


Fair enough. 'twould be a dull world if we all thought the same.

Re the indoctrination "cumulative build up" argument, I suppose I think of it in that way because indoctrination is a physical process. It's caused by infrasound and electromagnetic radiation, and possibly more exotic effects like quantum entanglement, directly influencing and altering an organic brain. As such I compare it to broadly similar phenomena in the real world. One's cancer risk is affected by one's cumulative exposure to radiation or carginogens, hence why nuclear technicians wear those patches that measure their radiation dose over time, and have to be relieved if it exceeds safe limits.

For the record I also believe Rana received all her exposure on Virmire - but it remained completely dormant and beneath her awareness until ME3. She seemed broadly the same in ME2 as she was in ME1, certainly not insane at any rate. This would imply that a relatively short exposure could plant a self sustaining "seed" which could grow into indoctrination over time.

You on the other hand are of the opinion that exposure has to be in one contiguous period exceeding a certain minimum length before indoctrination sets in. I don't see it that way, but hey, different strokes...

Looks like we'll both be keeping our different interpretations, but it's been an enjoyable conversation nonetheless. Cheers. :)

Modifié par Eryri, 16 janvier 2013 - 02:32 .


#115
Ithurael

Ithurael
  • Members
  • 3 188 messages

Indy_S wrote...

The worst part is that when he wakes up, Shepard gets to talk to TIM again. Apparently, even the minor antagonist hasn't been dealt with. No resolution to that conflict, either. I suppose Anderson is also alive, though, so that's something. I'm really looking forward to the next game where Shepard picks himself up, dusts himself off and gets shot by a Reaper.

I really like how the "Take Earth back" is played off in the final scene. With IT, you only take back two blocks and then there's rubble. Absolutely stunning how well that goes.


IT is a way to view the ending.

You can go literal interpretation or IT interpretation. Either way, the ending is the ending.

#116
dorktainian

dorktainian
  • Members
  • 4 419 messages

Ithurael wrote...

Indy_S wrote...

The worst part is that when he wakes up, Shepard gets to talk to TIM again. Apparently, even the minor antagonist hasn't been dealt with. No resolution to that conflict, either. I suppose Anderson is also alive, though, so that's something. I'm really looking forward to the next game where Shepard picks himself up, dusts himself off and gets shot by a Reaper.

I really like how the "Take Earth back" is played off in the final scene. With IT, you only take back two blocks and then there's rubble. Absolutely stunning how well that goes.


IT is a way to view the ending.

You can go literal interpretation or IT interpretation. Either way, the ending is the ending.

and both are equally as valid.

#117
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages

Ithurael wrote...

Indy_S wrote...

The worst part is that when he wakes up, Shepard gets to talk to TIM again. Apparently, even the minor antagonist hasn't been dealt with. No resolution to that conflict, either. I suppose Anderson is also alive, though, so that's something. I'm really looking forward to the next game where Shepard picks himself up, dusts himself off and gets shot by a Reaper.

I really like how the "Take Earth back" is played off in the final scene. With IT, you only take back two blocks and then there's rubble. Absolutely stunning how well that goes.


IT is a way to view the ending.

You can go literal interpretation or IT interpretation. Either way, the ending is the ending.


Well no, because if IT is true, the Reapers are still there, and the war isn't over.

So either IT is true, and the story continues, or Plotholes Galore is true, and it's truly the ending.

And that's the point. People can't accept that the story isn't over. That's why people don't believe.

Inb4 "Bioware says it's over111!!1"

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 16 janvier 2013 - 02:59 .


#118
dorktainian

dorktainian
  • Members
  • 4 419 messages
damn you hindsight

if you want to stick your head in a cannon and go lalalalalala the end is the end then fine.

I dont......   :wizard:

Modifié par dorktainian, 16 janvier 2013 - 03:05 .


#119
MegaIllusiveMan

MegaIllusiveMan
  • Members
  • 4 440 messages
About Object Rho: It's not a cannon event, so Shepard couldn't be Indocrinated. He could simply skip Arrival. Then the Alliance send Marines

#120
IMNOTCRAZYiminsane

IMNOTCRAZYiminsane
  • Members
  • 450 messages
Because Shepard is the Messiah and the Messiah can block out temptations the devil sees the Messiah as a threat

Book of Lazarus
Book of Leviathan
Book of Effect

#121
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages
There is cannon and there is canon.

And if you want to discuss the possibility of indoctrination, join the IT group or go directly to this forum.
Sadly Evil Chris has stated that he does not want to see any IT discussions on the board anymore.

#122
mackan__s

mackan__s
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
Some of you really need to see The Indoctrination Theory Documentary..

#123
dorktainian

dorktainian
  • Members
  • 4 419 messages

IMNOTCRAZYiminsane wrote...

Because Shepard is the Messiah and the Messiah can block out temptations the devil sees the Messiah as a threat

Book of Lazarus
Book of Leviathan
Book of Effect

 

taken from Indian Jones Wiki** 

The Omega Book * was a legendary book that contained a record of every person's life and fate. It was hidden in a secret chamber underneath the Pyramids. This chamber could only be entered through the Sphinx's paws. 

Indiana Jones discovered the book, and revealed the fate of both Mishima Sokai and Kaspar Maskelyne. Discovering he was to die there and then, Sokai tried to force Jones to alter it it, but Sokai caught fire was burned to death.

#124
draconian139

draconian139
  • Members
  • 391 messages

MegaIllusiveMan wrote...

About Object Rho: It's not a cannon event, so Shepard couldn't be Indocrinated. He could simply skip Arrival. Then the Alliance send Marines


Arrival is unnecessary for indoctrination.  My Shepard never did Arrival either, he was still around far more reaper tech over the course of the series than many that were indoctrinated.

#125
MacroSpamMK

MacroSpamMK
  • Members
  • 272 messages

mackan__s wrote...

Some of you really need to see The Indoctrination Theory Documentary..


I have, and whilst it has many interesting points that did seem valid and make me reconsider, there is one major flaw that many others in this thread have pointed out.
If the IT is true, then we are not getting a conclusion to the Reaper conflict.