Master Che wrote...
Dark_Caduceus wrote...
Well I'm not surprised you can't follow logic.
I'll try to distill my points.
1. You claim that Harbinger could hear Shepard (this is a supposition, there's no evidence that Reapers can or cannot hear infantry on the ground).
2. If one is to grant you this supposition as true, then you can't really expect Harbinger to not be able to aim his laser correctly, remember he missed Shepard with the beam).
3. He recognized that the Normandy wasn't a thrat, but by the same token, why was he attacking the gunships, even before they got close to him?
I'll ignore your insults and address your points.
1) How did Shepard have a conversation with Reapers if they cannot hear?
2) What in my supposition states anything about aim? What does hearing have to do with sight? No where did I say anything about "aim" or "sight". Are you recalling some other post? That's why I cannot follow you.
3) You mean the gunships that were flying at him and shooting their cannons at him?
When did Shepard have a conversation with Reapers? He spoke to Sovereign in Mass Effect 1, sort of, but that's a moot point because: A. Mass Effect 1 is so far detached from Mass Effect 3 as to make to difference and B. He was speaking to a holographic projection, presumably from a console designed for such communication. He wasn't in a huge chatoic battle where his words were just picked up by "reaper ears".
You're supposing that Harbinger can "hear" Shepard, there's no basis for believing this. But if you're going to assume, for no reason, that Harbinger can hear Shepard in a chaotic battle, then I'm going to assume, without reason, that Harbinger's targetting system is good enough to actually hit Shepard (which it weasn;t because Harbinger missed).
Harbinger couldn't have been concerned about the gunships shgooting at him, because it invalidates your point about the Normandy not being a threat. First you claimed that the soldiers running for the conduit are the threat that Harbinger is trying to end. If this were the case why fire at the gunships? If Harbinger feared they were an actual risk to him, then why did he ignore the Normandy? Remember, the Normandy is a state of the art frigate, designed for ship-to-ship combat, which has likely been upgraded even behyond normal frigates, but he directs his fire at gunships, designed for shooting infantry and small vehicles? What? I thought Harbinger was 100% logic, all the time.
Edit: I wasn't attempting to insult you when I said i'm unsurprised you don;t follow logic. I was jsut being honest, given what you've posted thus far I'm literally unsurprised that you have difficulty following a rational stream of thought. I apologize.
Modifié par Dark_Caduceus, 16 janvier 2013 - 05:50 .
Retour en haut
