Renmiri1 wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
I for one hope the writers continue to not worry much about possessive feelings players may develop towards fictional romance interests, and certainly not worry about it at the expense of drama.
Wish Fulfillment: The Game already exists. We don't need BioWare games to be that too.
Is not the same at all. Sims 3 is pretty much all headcannon, there is no story. Role playing on Second Life is also mentioned as an alternative but again, no story. And no point, since there are no quests or bosses to defeat. It is even more "loose" than Skyrim.
The whole idea that people who like romances in a game are some kind of dateless teens or deviant sexual fetishists (as stated in another thread here) is offensive and bogus. People don't play Bioware games for "dating" or for "pr0n" because both of those can be done a lot further on other games.
Second Life does have the pixel pr0n factor and I gotta tell you, it goes many miles beyond what you see in Bioware games. Hentai also goes a lot further. And then there's internet pr0n. There are plenty of sites to see more than a couple in their underwar, fading to black.
If playing a game that has this teenage level romance scenes embarasses you among your friends, I suggest that you need to either grow up or get new friends.
A host of people are misinterpreting what I felt was a plainly obvious criticism. So I will spell it out for everyone who replied as if I was saying something else:
The keyword in my post is
possessive.
To which posters and complaints am I referring then? Those that concern themselves with the "fidelity" of their chosen romance option, often while stretching their definition of what would constitute loyal or fair behavior outside the constraints of the game or reason itself.
That isn't to say that players cannot play characters that would feel betrayed by their chosen love interest for whatever reason is befitting that character. But that is almost never how these posts approach the issue. It is always a personal betrayal by either the character in question or - worse - by the writers, having led such a precious and cherished thing down an unexpected and unwanted path. You know, because of the "story" or whatever.
So whenever I see a poster angry about Alistair or Fenris' alleged cheating (the latter is especially insane, given that players claim his sleeping with Isabela in
games they are not romancing him constitutes unacceptable infidelity to the extent some
sociopaths immature people sell her to the Arishok rather than put up with it), I roll my eyes. But I
don't always post. To each their own, of course. Going around telling people how to feel is a pointless and futile exercise. That said...
When do I post? When this kind of opinion is promoted to "the writers shouldn't do [this/that]" levels of rhetoric. Then I'm going to be as loud, or louder, voicing my disagreement on principle.
"I want the [romances/friendships] to [play out exactly how I want] and not make me feel [list of unwanted emotions]" argument is something I will continue to disagree with. Because the romances need not exercises in wish fulfillment, and when they are, they are likely to suffer for it.
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 30 janvier 2013 - 12:13 .