51 réponses à ce sujet

[esper]

Keriana wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...
The player is the Inquisitor.

Hey, Elite, nothing has been announced yet, and some of us are still hoping not to be an inquisitor. 

Yeah.

It still think it is a terrible title. Horrible real world associations which (wherever true or not) does not bring up something I want indetified with.

Horrible inworld association, and as Lob said. Why name and organisation that, when there is templar running free from the chantry. People are going to assume you are a radical group of them, because of the history of the word in Thedas. (at least the mages and templars are because they were likely educated in in the history of the Circle. Certainly seemed that way in origins.)

All in all, I fail to see a good reason for calling your group that.

[LolaLei]

esper wrote...

Keriana wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...
The player is the Inquisitor.

Hey, Elite, nothing has been announced yet, and some of us are still hoping not to be an inquisitor. 

Yeah.

It still think it is a terrible title. Horrible real world associations which (wherever true or not) does not bring up something I want indetified with.

Horrible inworld association, and as Lob said. Why name and organisation that, when there is templar running free from the chantry. People are going to assume you are a radical group of them, because of the history of the word in Thedas. (at least the mages and templars are because they were likely educated in in the history of the Circle. Certainly seemed that way in origins.)

All in all, I fail to see a good reason for calling your group that.

Yeah, it does seem rather strange, especially if we aren't forced to be Chantry affliated. Unless we aren't part of the Inquisition at all? 

It's one of the main things that I'm hoping will be clarified when they start giving us proper info.