iakus wrote...
You agreed to one of the Catalyst's new "solutions" and committed genocide on your own allies in teh process. Or at the very least, betrayed a squadmate and effectively shot her in the back "for the greater good"
Right and I was forced to work with Cerberus, a terrorist organization, and I was forced to blow up a Batarian system just to delay the Reapers.
My "principles" were already compromised. At least the Geth and EDI died knowing the risk. Maybe they didn't know that the Crucible would wipe them out, but they knew that striking the Reapers head on was basically a Suicide Mission. It was partly because of their efforts that we were even able to defeat the Reapers.
My Shepard takes responsibility, but they died as heros and their sacrifice did not go in vein. Comparing me to Saren is a pretty ridiculous analogy, especially when Saren did what he did because he wanted to avoid major casualities. Your argument is fundamentally flawed because the "ends justifies the means" isn't exclusively embraced by bad guys.
And it wasn't the Catalyst's solution. The Crucible was created and activated on our terms. The Catalyst is bound by the choices, not the other way around.
Modifié par MegaSovereign, 19 janvier 2013 - 08:59 .