Hm, could be possible. First hint that something's amiss are the collectors. After their defeat Saren and the geth step up.
I do think the time frame is too short. It should have been more than just 3 years. At least 10. and there shuld have been some pressure, like AI on the rise or something (if they really wanted to go with the organics vs. synthetics stuff).
Is the trilogy better off without ME2?
Débuté par
justafan
, janv. 21 2013 10:05
Retour en haut
#427
Posté 28 janvier 2013 - 04:53
The Heretic of Time
-
- Members
- 5 612 messages
klarabella wrote...
Hm, could be possible. First hint that something's amiss are the collectors. After their defeat Saren and the geth step up.
I do think the time frame is too short. It should have been more than just 3 years. At least 10. and there shuld have been some pressure, like AI on the rise or something (if they really wanted to go with the organics vs. synthetics stuff).
Yeah, the geth should just have been uncontrollable rogue AIs, instead of all that apologetic bullcrap that we got in ME2 and ME3. The geth in ME1 were much more interesting. They should have stayed like that through the entire trilogy.
Also, another reason why ME2 being the first game would have made more sense is the fact that you assemble a team in that game. It would make more sense to assemble your dream team in the first game, and then use that team for the 2nd and 3rd game (with perhaps a few casualties here and there, and a few new recruits as well).
