714 réponses à ce sujet

[HiddenInWar]

Chris Priestly wrote...

impingu1984 wrote...

ruggly wrote...

ready for another "leak?"

God i hope that isn't true..

I much preferred the first "leak"

Also fake.

Thank god.

[The Night Mammoth]

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.

What? No we don't, we have very little idea of what people might be up to, so something that exposes on this might be something I'd enjoy. 

I don't really mind though. I was unsatisfied, so I wrote what they did.

I'm a sucker for those cheesy romantic ending types anyway. 

Begrudingly, so am I. 

Although I much prefer it when they're hard earned by lots of angst and sacrifice. 

ME3 was a little too upbeat, to me. Everything you do is successful except Thessia, and you fix that anyway. 

[Kabraxal]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.

What? No we don't, we have very little idea of what people might be up to, so something that exposes on this might be something I'd enjoy. 

I don't really mind though. I was unsatisfied, so I wrote what they did.

I'm a sucker for those cheesy romantic ending types anyway. 

Begrudingly, so am I. 

Although I much prefer it when they're hard earned by lots of angst and sacrifice. 

ME3 was a little too upbeat, to me. Everything you do is successful except Thessia, and you fix that anyway. 

I actually felt Rannoch/Tuchanka was the perfet amount of sacrifice and how it should be done for the most part.  Though I do think Rannoch needed a little more flexibility based on ME2 choices.  

I think the real issue is that we weren't given the option for a truly good ending.  It was all varying shades of horrible.  As has been brought up time and again, people were expecting an ending like Dragon Age: Origins in that you had a failry wide range of outcomes from mostly sweet bittersweet to pretty damn bitter bittersweet.  There were sacrifices and losses, but they never felt disconnected and pretty much any Warden you could RP would find a natural fit.

There is a reason the US ending in that game is celebrated and not treated like the ending to ME3.  It fit the lore, the build, and the Warden.  It made sense and still gave you that nice epilogue roll detailing what happened to everyone else.  People wanted that in ME3 and we got the furthest possible thing from it pre EC... post EC it got better in some respects, but worse in that many things get even more confusing as Bioware desperately tries to validate the logic of the ending and only continually creating more plot holes. 

[Phen0meenal]

McGrzegorz wrote...

One of the comments there:
"People, don't dismiss this. It might actually be true. Remember when OTS created an account here and leaked the retaliation description? this looks exactly the same. His name is TheTrueVivec too.

We'll see.."

I want this to be true because whenever I replay ME3 I stop at London mission. :-p

Even though Evil Chris confirmed this to be fake, i still hope for it to be true in some way. We'll see.

HiddenInWar wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

impingu1984 wrote...

ruggly wrote...

ready for another "leak?"

God i hope that isn't true..

I much preferred the first "leak"

Also fake.



[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/devil.png[/smilie]

Thank god.

What did it say?

Modifié par Phen0meenal, 24 janvier 2013 - 10:17 .

[HiddenInWar]

The Mad Hanar wrote...

My sources came through! The best non-Bioware official leak you'll find anywhere!

I aLMOST CHOKED ON MY HOTDOG

[chidingewe8036]

all i want is for shepard's crew to find him and rescue him why is that so darn (for lack of a better word or words) hard for Bioware to implement???? We go through all that and all they give us is a breath? unacceptable and completely retarded unless of course Shepard is coming back for ME4 then I wll accept it but if not it needs to either be changed, taken out completely, or expanded on nothing else is relevant.

[Mcfly616]

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

PainCakesx wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

It's seems simply knowing that Shepard is alive isn't enough for some people.(because he is indeed alive in high EMS Destroy).

They're willing to pay money for a different picture/angle of it.


Lolol

In a visual medium, showing is more important than telling. 

Definitely this. 

And it just isn't him suriviving... it's about actual satisfying closure that is built from what came before instead of a sudden theme and tonal shift that focuses on the technological singularity that hadn't been anything in the main trilogy.  I think many would have been disgruntled, but okay if Shepard died if it actually followed the story.  As it stands, Shepard became an idiot or died for no good reason simply because of some plot device to deliver an arbitrary decision that came out of nowhere.

it is about showing. And they showed him Alive. The end.


Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.


The only thing I wouldn't mind is seeing Shepard stand up out of the rubble with that creepy smirk of his. (Like ME1), then cut to credits. If not, its whatever because I know he's alive and what all of his squad is going to do now that the war is over, anyways.

Again... if Shepard stayed dead and we got that kind of epilogue, the outrage would have been muted.  But then, you are ignoring actual points against the ending as it stands to outright denegrate those of us not happily defending the plot hole laden fiasco that has dragged the series off the pinnacle of gaming.  At least try to actually discuss the points brought up.  I know I know... it's a difficult job actually trying to defend the ending with actual evidence. 

"plot hole" ?


I see, some people still don't know the definition of the word....

[CynicalShep]

dreamgazer wrote...

That's what's kinda humorous about the whole thing.

Even I'm not THAT heartless. Although gotta admit it was somewhat funny in the very beginning. Now it's just not right.

chidingewe8036 wrote...

Anything man anything for Shepard to have a chance just look at the MEHEM. Hope is all we have it is ultimately in Bioware's hands and up to them we in reality can do nothing except purchase or not purhase thats about it.

We both knows how well desperate hope works in real life(not). I am well aware of MEHEM and this is not the first time something like that was made. Truth be told, it doesn't matter. Controversy is publicity and emotions are a good game seller. No matter how pissed off everybody is most of the people on this forum will be back on the hype train at least 3 months before ME4. 

[chidingewe8036]

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

My sources came through! The best non-Bioware official leak you'll find anywhere!

I aLMOST CHOKED ON MY HOTDOG

you have a dirty mind hidden

[HiddenInWar]

chidingewe8036 wrote...

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

My sources came through! The best non-Bioware official leak you'll find anywhere!

I aLMOST CHOKED ON MY HOTDOG

you have a dirty mind hidden

oh my god  no but really I'm eating lunch 

[chidingewe8036]

CynicalShep wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

That's what's kinda humorous about the whole thing.

Even I'm not THAT heartless. Although gotta admit it was somewhat funny in the very beginning. Now it's just not right.

chidingewe8036 wrote...

Anything man anything for Shepard to have a chance just look at the MEHEM. Hope is all we have it is ultimately in Bioware's hands and up to them we in reality can do nothing except purchase or not purhase thats about it.

We both knows how well desperate hope works in real life(not). I am well aware of MEHEM and this is not the first time something like that was made. Truth be told, it doesn't matter. Controversy is publicity and emotions are a good game seller. No matter how pissed off everybody is most of the people on this forum will be back on the hype train at least 3 months before ME4. 

never.........i'll never fall to the darkside, you failed Bioware I am a Jedi like my father before me

[chidingewe8036]

HiddenInWar wrote...

chidingewe8036 wrote...

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

My sources came through! The best non-Bioware official leak you'll find anywhere!

I aLMOST CHOKED ON MY HOTDOG

you have a dirty mind hidden

oh my god  no but really I'm eating lunch 

hehe i know same here pizza actually

[Kabraxal]

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

PainCakesx wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

It's seems simply knowing that Shepard is alive isn't enough for some people.(because he is indeed alive in high EMS Destroy).

They're willing to pay money for a different picture/angle of it.


Lolol

In a visual medium, showing is more important than telling. 

Definitely this. 

And it just isn't him suriviving... it's about actual satisfying closure that is built from what came before instead of a sudden theme and tonal shift that focuses on the technological singularity that hadn't been anything in the main trilogy.  I think many would have been disgruntled, but okay if Shepard died if it actually followed the story.  As it stands, Shepard became an idiot or died for no good reason simply because of some plot device to deliver an arbitrary decision that came out of nowhere.

it is about showing. And they showed him Alive. The end.


Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.


The only thing I wouldn't mind is seeing Shepard stand up out of the rubble with that creepy smirk of his. (Like ME1), then cut to credits. If not, its whatever because I know he's alive and what all of his squad is going to do now that the war is over, anyways.

Again... if Shepard stayed dead and we got that kind of epilogue, the outrage would have been muted.  But then, you are ignoring actual points against the ending as it stands to outright denegrate those of us not happily defending the plot hole laden fiasco that has dragged the series off the pinnacle of gaming.  At least try to actually discuss the points brought up.  I know I know... it's a difficult job actually trying to defend the ending with actual evidence. 

"plot hole" ?


I see, some people still don't know the definition of the word....

Why didn't the Catalyst activate the relay in the Citadel and end this years ago?   How the hell did one little program manage to betray a species, create a Reaper that looked just like them, and not get wiped out before he had an army?  Why was the Crucible never attacked before the end mission... why was it so easy to build... why did it suddenly appear when most needed?  Why does the Catalyst and ending ignore the fact that Shepard can make peace with synthetics and may have been championing tolerance for the whole trilogy?  Why does Harbinger fly away instead of finishing Shepard... or fire on the Normany in the EC?  Why does Shepared suddenly believe control is possible two minutes after arguing that option down... and oly because the Reaper god said so?

They are plot holes because they are left unexplained and just gigantic holes of logic in the narrative left gaping.  The EC and Leviathan actually created more problems than they solved and we are left with questions that need to be answered or the narrative breaks down under any amount of scrutiny.  So yes, plot hole...guess you are one of those people you were just talking about.  Oops.

[chidingewe8036]

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

PainCakesx wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

It's seems simply knowing that Shepard is alive isn't enough for some people.(because he is indeed alive in high EMS Destroy).

They're willing to pay money for a different picture/angle of it.


Lolol

In a visual medium, showing is more important than telling. 

Definitely this. 

And it just isn't him suriviving... it's about actual satisfying closure that is built from what came before instead of a sudden theme and tonal shift that focuses on the technological singularity that hadn't been anything in the main trilogy.  I think many would have been disgruntled, but okay if Shepard died if it actually followed the story.  As it stands, Shepard became an idiot or died for no good reason simply because of some plot device to deliver an arbitrary decision that came out of nowhere.

it is about showing. And they showed him Alive. The end.


Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.


The only thing I wouldn't mind is seeing Shepard stand up out of the rubble with that creepy smirk of his. (Like ME1), then cut to credits. If not, its whatever because I know he's alive and what all of his squad is going to do now that the war is over, anyways.

Again... if Shepard stayed dead and we got that kind of epilogue, the outrage would have been muted.  But then, you are ignoring actual points against the ending as it stands to outright denegrate those of us not happily defending the plot hole laden fiasco that has dragged the series off the pinnacle of gaming.  At least try to actually discuss the points brought up.  I know I know... it's a difficult job actually trying to defend the ending with actual evidence. 

"plot hole" ?


I see, some people still don't know the definition of the word....

Why didn't the Catalyst activate the relay in the Citadel and end this years ago?   How the hell did one little program manage to betray a species, create a Reaper that looked just like them, and not get wiped out before he had an army?  Why was the Crucible never attacked before the end mission... why was it so easy to build... why did it suddenly appear when most needed?  Why does the Catalyst and ending ignore the fact that Shepard can make peace with synthetics and may have been championing tolerance for the whole trilogy?  Why does Harbinger fly away instead of finishing Shepard... or fire on the Normany in the EC?  Why does Shepared suddenly believe control is possible two minutes after arguing that option down... and oly because the Reaper god said so?

They are plot holes because they are left unexplained and just gigantic holes of logic in the narrative left gaping.  The EC and Leviathan actually created more problems than they solved and we are left with questions that need to be answered or the narrative breaks down under any amount of scrutiny.  So yes, plot hole...guess you are one of those people you were just talking about.  Oops.

MASS EFFECT 3

[chidingewe8036]

Oh and by the way back on topic...........no no DLC Teasers coming soon Bioware just..........just forget it please I beg of you my lords.

[chidingewe8036]

Bioware to fans - your minds will be ours muhahahaaa

[CynicalShep]

chidingewe8036 wrote...

never.........i'll never fall to the darkside, you failed Bioware I am a Jedi like my father before me

Argh, the light side is weak. Pathetic. I can sense the desperation threatening to overwhelm you. Let it flow through you, let it channel your hate. Yeeees. Soon your transformation will be complete and you will embrace the dark side. Soon...

*read this in Darth Sidious' voice*

Modifié par CynicalShep, 24 janvier 2013 - 11:02 .

[Twilight_Princess]

chidingewe8036 wrote...

Oh and by the way back on topic...........no no DLC Teasers coming soon Bioware just..........just forget it please I beg of you my lords.

 
You've upset the great and powerful overlords and now we shall ALL be punished! We will never get more war assets now! Precious , precious war assets.

[Mcfly616]

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

PainCakesx wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

It's seems simply knowing that Shepard is alive isn't enough for some people.(because he is indeed alive in high EMS Destroy).

They're willing to pay money for a different picture/angle of it.


Lolol

In a visual medium, showing is more important than telling. 

Definitely this. 

And it just isn't him suriviving... it's about actual satisfying closure that is built from what came before instead of a sudden theme and tonal shift that focuses on the technological singularity that hadn't been anything in the main trilogy.  I think many would have been disgruntled, but okay if Shepard died if it actually followed the story.  As it stands, Shepard became an idiot or died for no good reason simply because of some plot device to deliver an arbitrary decision that came out of nowhere.

it is about showing. And they showed him Alive. The end.


Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.


The only thing I wouldn't mind is seeing Shepard stand up out of the rubble with that creepy smirk of his. (Like ME1), then cut to credits. If not, its whatever because I know he's alive and what all of his squad is going to do now that the war is over, anyways.

Again... if Shepard stayed dead and we got that kind of epilogue, the outrage would have been muted.  But then, you are ignoring actual points against the ending as it stands to outright denegrate those of us not happily defending the plot hole laden fiasco that has dragged the series off the pinnacle of gaming.  At least try to actually discuss the points brought up.  I know I know... it's a difficult job actually trying to defend the ending with actual evidence. 

"plot hole" ?


I see, some people still don't know the definition of the word....

Why didn't the Catalyst activate the relay in the Citadel and end this years ago?   How the hell did one little program manage to betray a species, create a Reaper that looked just like them, and not get wiped out before he had an army?  Why was the Crucible never attacked before the end mission... why was it so easy to build... why did it suddenly appear when most needed?  Why does the Catalyst and ending ignore the fact that Shepard can make peace with synthetics and may have been championing tolerance for the whole trilogy?  Why does Harbinger fly away instead of finishing Shepard... or fire on the Normany in the EC?  Why does Shepared suddenly believe control is possible two minutes after arguing that option down... and oly because the Reaper god said so?

They are plot holes because they are left unexplained and just gigantic holes of logic in the narrative left gaping.  The EC and Leviathan actually created more problems than they solved and we are left with questions that need to be answered or the narrative breaks down under any amount of scrutiny.  So yes, plot hole...guess you are one of those people you were just talking about.  Oops.

lol oh the irony.


"Logic" you say? Funny how that's all that is needed to explain every last little thing you listed. And hell, some of those are explained right in the game.

Just because you can ask how or why, doesn't make it a plothole.


Why didn't it open up the Citadel Relay? Umm play ME1

How did one little program betray an entire species? Umm play Leviathan

Why didn't the Crucible get attacked? Probably because its location was secret and was being built outside of Reaper controlled space.

Why was it so easy to build? Hmm well, the past cycles that have been adding to it over millennia must've figured it would continue to get passed along to the next cycle, wouldn't they want them to be able to comprehend it?

Why did appear when most needed? Probably because the writers didn't think of it until after ME2. Story-wise though? Hmm probably because its the best kept secret in the galaxy (the Catalyst even acknowledge it thought the designs had been eradicated). And was just now discovered because of the renewed interest in Prothean research after the events of the first two games (read datapad on Mars, explains this and that they found a second Prothean archive deeper in the surface of Mars)

Why doesn't it recognize that Shepard can make peace with synthetics? The Peace won't last. Synthetics will always come into conflict with organics. It's been around for a billion years and knows this is one simple truth.

Why doesn't Harbinger finish off Shepard? Probably because he thinks he's already dead considering he had just blasted his ass and he was out cold. (Notice Shepard has to 'wake up' and stumble to the beam. And did you see him? He looks like a zombie. He looks like a walking corpse.)

Why doesn't Harbinger blast the Normandy? Hmm priorities?! Making sure that none of dozens of soldiers and Makos charging the beam make it. Because after all, making it to the Citadel is the key to docking the Crucible and defeating the Reapers. So, shall we stop our immenent destruction by making sure not a single soul makes it up there OR should I turn my attention to this ship that isn't even bothering me? You figure it out.

Why does Shepard believe Control will actually work 2 mins after arguing against it? It's called "dramatic Irony". When things aren't always as you thought they were. Happens in countless works of fiction.


Hmm as I said "plot holes?" Lol.

All I did was play the game, pay attention and use common sense. The idea that you think something is a plothole because you weren't spoon-fed every last detail with an explaination is quite telling. When each and every one can be extrapolated with a bit of common sense.



Oh....but there is an actual plothole amongst all the stuff that clearly makes sense. Anderson: "I followed you up the beam....". Ummm no you didn't bro lol

Modifié par Mcfly616, 24 janvier 2013 - 11:09 .

[HiddenInWar]

Hyrule_Gal wrote...

chidingewe8036 wrote...

Oh and by the way back on topic...........no no DLC Teasers coming soon Bioware just..........just forget it please I beg of you my lords.

 
You've upset the great and powerful overlords and now we shall ALL be punished! We will never get more war assets now! Precious , precious war assets.

Reeeeeally hope this new dlc to diverge over something besides war assets <_<

[Ghost]

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Kabraxal wrote...

PainCakesx wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

It's seems simply knowing that Shepard is alive isn't enough for some people.(because he is indeed alive in high EMS Destroy).

They're willing to pay money for a different picture/angle of it.


Lolol

In a visual medium, showing is more important than telling. 

Definitely this. 

And it just isn't him suriviving... it's about actual satisfying closure that is built from what came before instead of a sudden theme and tonal shift that focuses on the technological singularity that hadn't been anything in the main trilogy.  I think many would have been disgruntled, but okay if Shepard died if it actually followed the story.  As it stands, Shepard became an idiot or died for no good reason simply because of some plot device to deliver an arbitrary decision that came out of nowhere.

it is about showing. And they showed him Alive. The end.


Basically what your implying is that you want some long drawn out craptastic "Return of the King" epilogue, showing what each and every last squadmate is doing after the war....and show Shepard holding his L.I. in his arms. (Even though we know what each and every squadmate is going to do after the war). It doesn't get more cheesy than that.


The only thing I wouldn't mind is seeing Shepard stand up out of the rubble with that creepy smirk of his. (Like ME1), then cut to credits. If not, its whatever because I know he's alive and what all of his squad is going to do now that the war is over, anyways.

Again... if Shepard stayed dead and we got that kind of epilogue, the outrage would have been muted.  But then, you are ignoring actual points against the ending as it stands to outright denegrate those of us not happily defending the plot hole laden fiasco that has dragged the series off the pinnacle of gaming.  At least try to actually discuss the points brought up.  I know I know... it's a difficult job actually trying to defend the ending with actual evidence. 

"plot hole" ?


I see, some people still don't know the definition of the word....

Why didn't the Catalyst activate the relay in the Citadel and end this years ago?   How the hell did one little program manage to betray a species, create a Reaper that looked just like them, and not get wiped out before he had an army?  Why was the Crucible never attacked before the end mission... why was it so easy to build... why did it suddenly appear when most needed?  Why does the Catalyst and ending ignore the fact that Shepard can make peace with synthetics and may have been championing tolerance for the whole trilogy?  Why does Harbinger fly away instead of finishing Shepard... or fire on the Normany in the EC?  Why does Shepared suddenly believe control is possible two minutes after arguing that option down... and oly because the Reaper god said so?

They are plot holes because they are left unexplained and just gigantic holes of logic in the narrative left gaping.  The EC and Leviathan actually created more problems than they solved and we are left with questions that need to be answered or the narrative breaks down under any amount of scrutiny.  So yes, plot hole...guess you are one of those people you were just talking about.  Oops.

lol oh the irony.


"Logic" you say? Funny how that's all that is needed to explain every last little thing you listed. And hell, some of those are explained right in the game.

Just because you can ask how or why, doesn't make it a plothole.


Why didn't it open up the Citadel Relay? Umm play ME1

How did one little program betray an entire species? Umm play Leviathan

Why didn't the Crucible get attacked? Probably because its location was secret and was being built outside of Reaper controlled space.

Why was it so easy to build? Hmm well, the past cycles that have been adding to it over millennia must've figured it would continue to get passed along to the next cycle, wouldn't they want them to be able to comprehend it?

Why did appear when most needed? Probably because the writers didn't think of it until after ME2. Story-wise though? Hmm probably because its the best kept secret in the galaxy (the Catalyst even acknowledge it thought the designs had been eradicated). And was just now discovered because of the renewed interest in Prothean research after the events of the first two games (read datapad on Mars, explains this and that they found a second Prothean archive deeper in the surface of Mars)

why doesn't it recognize that Shepard can make peace with synthetics? The Peace won't last. Synthetics will always come into conflict with organics. It's been around for a billion years and knows this is one simple truth.

Why doesn't Harbinger finish of Shepard? Probably because he thinks he's already dead considering he had just blasted his ass and he was out cold. (Notice Shepard has to 'wake up' and stumble to the beam. And did you see him? He looks like a zombie. He looks like a walking corpse.)

Why doesn't Harbinger blast the Normandy? Hmm priorities?! Making sure that none of dozens of soldiers and Makos charging the beam make it. Because after all, making it to the Citadel is the key to docking the Crucible and defeating the Reapers. So, shall we stop our immenent destruction by making sure not a single soul makes it up there OR should I turn my attention to this ship that isn't even bothering me? You figure it out.

Why does Shepard believe Control will actually work 2 mins after arguing against it? It's called "dramatic Irony". When things aren't always as you thought they were. Happens in countless works of fiction.


Hmm as I said "plot holes?" Lol.

All I did was play the game, pay attention and use common sense. The idea that you think something is a plothole because you weren't spoon-fed every last detail with an explaination is quite telling. When each and every one can be extrapolated with a bit of common sense.



Oh....but there is an actual plothole amongst all the stuff that clearly makes sense. Anderson: "I followed you up the beam....". Ummm no you didn't bro lol

This.

[HiddenInWar]

Has anyone really noticed how big quote trees sort of look 3D?

[Vic7im]

what's with those ziggurats?

[IIEquillibriumII]

HiddenInWar wrote...

chidingewe8036 wrote...

HiddenInWar wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

My sources came through! The best non-Bioware official leak you'll find anywhere!

I aLMOST CHOKED ON MY HOTDOG

you have a dirty mind hidden

oh my god  no but really I'm eating lunch 

Ohh god why did i laugh so hard about you choke, made my day!