182 réponses à ce sujet

[xtorma]

Final approximate scores for a gold game - Collectors hazard Giant

1 - 147000
2 - 124000
3 - 114000
4 - 81000

Did #4 pull thier weight in your opinion?

[d_nought]

It's not really that bad just from looking at it.  80k is a good score to expect from PUG randoms. Depends on whether or not you extracted and had good objectives.

Modifié par chipsandwich, 23 janvier 2013 - 09:53 .

[Catman Assuming Direct Control]

Yes they did, I just finished a gold, I jumped in during wave 3, top scorer 110k, then me with 100k, third had 60k and 4th barely got 30k

[ValorOfArms777]

yes...as long as his score didn't say something super small like 5k or 10k even 20k is iffy around 30-w/e is usually trying to pull some sorta weight

[Doctor Trick]

As long as he/she was playing the objective and not dying in the middle of woop woop, I would.

[SMBTheExile]

Perfectly acceptable imho.

[Simon_Wryly]

Scores are meaningless; there's no context.

If this were a Volus Adept recharging everyone's shields and reviving anyone who dropped, I'd say he not only pulled his weight, he probably carried the team. If this was a Vanguard of some kind, I'd wonder if maybe they were experimenting with an unfamiliar character or loadout.

There are lotsa reasons people score low, and this isn't all that low compared to the other scores. If it were 12,000 I'd say you have a point, but this doesn't bother me at all.

[Homey C-Dawg]

Looks fine to me. TBH I'm kinda surprised someone even could consider an 80k score as not pulling their weight.

[Domnuxx]

Those are some pretty big scores for a match against Collectors.

[xtorma]

Domnux wrote...

Those are some pretty big scores for a match against Collectors.

If you get 4 objectives multiple times and your team kills instead of kites the scores can add up.

[WizeMan305]

Id say its a decent score for fourth place, Id play with him again. Anything over 60k is ok in my book, and 45k if map and faction are selected.

[xtorma]

Simon_Wryly wrote...

Scores are meaningless; there's no context.

If this were a Volus Adept recharging everyone's shields and reviving anyone who dropped, I'd say he not only pulled his weight, he probably carried the team. If this was a Vanguard of some kind, I'd wonder if maybe they were experimenting with an unfamiliar character or loadout.

There are lotsa reasons people score low, and this isn't all that low compared to the other scores. If it were 12,000 I'd say you have a point, but this doesn't bother me at all.

Wasn't really trying to make a point. just asking for opinions.

[HolyAvenger]

80k is fine.

[kleichombam]

Not at all as long as he was helping with the objectives, i have seen people taking the scoreboard too seriously for my liking and taking off during hack objectives (read : not distracting) only to die out, not to use medi-gel and another idiot taking off to revive the fallen 'rambo' only sacrificing himself on a fool's errand. Don't mind people getting low scores, but do mind people coming into the game only to prove a point (scores)/to be carried. But then such is PUG life.

[xtorma]

kleichombam wrote...

Not at all as long as he was helping with the objectives, i have seen people taking the scoreboard too seriously for my liking and taking off during hack objectives (read : not distracting) only to die out, not to use medi-gel and another idiot taking off to revive the fallen 'rambo' only sacrificing himself on a fool's errand. Don't mind people getting low scores, but do mind people coming into the game only to prove a point (scores)/to be carried. But then such is PUG life.

So you think 80k is a low score for gold?

[Cyonan]

Not enough information to determine.

[CoffeeHolic93]

I'm more used to seeing 30 - 50,000 so I'd love to play with that guy again.

[Simon_Wryly]

xtorma wrote...

Simon_Wryly wrote...

Scores are meaningless; there's no context.

If this were a Volus Adept recharging everyone's shields and reviving anyone who dropped, I'd say he not only pulled his weight, he probably carried the team. If this was a Vanguard of some kind, I'd wonder if maybe they were experimenting with an unfamiliar character or loadout.

There are lotsa reasons people score low, and this isn't all that low compared to the other scores. If it were 12,000 I'd say you have a point, but this doesn't bother me at all.

Wasn't really trying to make a point. just asking for opinions.

Understood. My unintentional mistake. I didn't mean to imply that you were making any particular point, I just used unclear language. Sorry.

[xtorma]

Cyonan wrote...

Not enough information to determine.

Didn't expect this coming from you.

[Computron2000]

From the total score, this was a bad game. 450k in a collectors game is likely an extended game. Not sure who was responsible for it without more details

[Homey C-Dawg]

Cyonan wrote...

Not enough information to determine.

I'd argue it's plenty of information. You can't get 80k in a gold match without putting a lot of damage down on the enemy, even if everyone else is getting the kills.

[Zorinho20_CRO]

Homey C-Dawg wrote...

Looks fine to me. TBH I'm kinda surprised someone even could consider an 80k score as not pulling their weight.

[xtorma]

Computron2000 wrote...

From the total score, this was a bad game. 450k in a collectors game is likely an extended game. Not sure who was responsible for it without more details

Milking.

[Cyonan]

Homey C-Dawg wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

Not enough information to determine.

I'd argue it's plenty of information. You can't get 80k in a gold match without putting a lot of damage down on the enemy, even if everyone else is getting the kills.

If you were to learn he used 8 missiles on wave 11 spawns, would you still think that is a good score?

[WilliamYZFR1]

Mi-Chan wrote...

I'm more used to seeing 30 - 50,000 so I'd love to play with that guy again.

+1