KnightofPhoenix wrote...
I admit the prospect of an orgy with Letho, Radovid, Emhyr and Philippa did cross my mind several dozens of times.
It would be a political cluster ****. The good kind.
Meh, I just want to see the rest of Iorveth's tattoo.:innocent:
Corto81 wrote...
Females aside...
How would rate Geralt's path buddies?
Yaehvinn vs Sigfried
- I only ever played neutral and Scoiatel paths in TW1, I really can't stand religious fanatics.
And I realize Sigfried has much more to his character, but I couldn't get past it.
Yaehvinn was more of a fit for me, though Scoiatel in general went too far (killing children in Murky Waters).
In the end, Yaehvinn feels similar to Iorveth.
Siding with Sigfried felt off to me, and Sigfried himself seemed naive and too zealous for my liking.
I did the same as you. Scoia'tael on my first run, neutral on the second, but found myself still siding with the Scoia'tael in the bank, simply because it prevents more slaughter of humanoids. I thought the encounter with Yaehvinn in the bank when you try to negotiate is pretty funny as well.
Yaehvinn: *philosophical question, rant rant*
Geralt: "Yaehvinn...."
Yaehvinn: *continues rant*
LOL, I don't know, I just found the impatience in Geralt's voice amusing.
To experience all sides in TW1 I should side with the Orderin a third game, but find it hard to justify that choice for Geralt. I suppose it could work when you take the protecting humans from monsters literally and consider every threat to humans as something you need to eliminate. Still doesn't really appeal to me.

Roche vs Iorveth
- I did about 10-12 TW2 playthroughs so far- mostly with Roche, but some with Iorveth.
I find Geralt siding with Roche makes much more sense, as Roche helps Geralt out and just feels slightly more balanced than Iorveth (though Roche obviously has issues of his own).
For a Geralt who cares even a little about Triss and/or is driven to go after Letho directly, going with Iorveth seems to make the most sense, imo. Roche wants to drag Geralt into political business and more or less use him to kill humans, which Geralt supposedly doesn't do.
I realize a LOT of it goes down to personal preferences and all the choices are very grey, but would you still prefer factions like that in TW3?
It's probably inevitable that you have to form alliances with certain people/factions, even if they're temporary. Getting to Yennefer and/or the Wild Hunt would be very difficult, or even impossible otherwise.
As for the Triss vs. Shani choice: the first time I told Dandelion to take Alvin to Triss without any hesitation. Alvin is clearly a powerful Source and therefore needs guidance from a mage. Shani doesn't know a thing about magic, so she can't give Alvin the help he needs. Her harsh words about Triss being infertile and simply wanting her paws on the boy so that she could have a child for herself turned me off of Shani as well. I thought that reaction was uncalled for, and she was more thinking about herself and Geralt than what was best for Alvin.
On my second playthrough I did chose Shani and tried her romance, but still it didn't feel completely "right" (I thought Triss' romance felt rather forced as well, so that's probably not entirely Shani's fault). It only increased my respect for Triss, because despite the fact that she was hurt and angry, she did continue to help Geralt with his memory and Salamandra, whereas Shani simply refuses to speak to you at all until you meet again in Old Vizima, where she yells at you some more.
Ah well, personal preferences I suppose.