landylan wrote...
I see it all the time when the PCers post their E-peen boosters, but they've been letting the xbox players make lame score threads recently.121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
If someone scores 250k in a 4 player game I think it's safe to say that player is a good player.
Agree. The likelihood of this happening regularly, however, is another matter altogether.
Happens regularly when I play. :innocent:
I see. In all my time playing (2500+ games and counting) I've yet to, even once, witness this.
Good player = High scoring?
#251
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:16
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
#252
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:21
121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
If someone scores 250k in a 4 player game I think it's safe to say that player is a good player.
Agree. The likelihood of this happening regularly, however, is another matter altogether.
Yep.
You've gotta play unknown/unknown for that.
Who in their right mind would be willing to risk ending up against Geth ?
#253
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:21
I actually like your guys threads. Jav stepping and all that headshotting when yall post videos. Not fond of the Mexican prostitutes on xbox though.Lord_Sirian wrote...
landylan wrote...
I see it all the time when the PCers post their E-peen boosters, but they've been letting the xbox players make lame score threads recently.121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
If someone scores 250k in a 4 player game I think it's safe to say that player is a good player.
Agree. The likelihood of this happening regularly, however, is another matter altogether.
Happens regularly when I play. :innocent:
I see. In all my time playing (2500+ games and counting) I've yet to, even once, witness this.
#254
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:22
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
#255
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:28
I'm just messing with you because I knew you'd read this bruh. Don't make me feel bad.Lord_Sirian wrote...
We don't make videos to boost e-peen though. :
#256
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:31
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
#257
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:33
Lord_Sirian wrote...
Unfounded bragusations get to us after a while you know. ;-(
consider yourself bragused:police:, you elitist PC DB.
#258
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:33
#259
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:36
If I sounded condescending, it's because I copied what you said basically...Original Stikman wrote...
landylan wrote...
Instead of proving that something is not true, you are going to "debunk" it? Your debunking statement is false. DPS is not as important on other difficulties. Powers are more effective and accuracy of weapons is actually useful for headshots.Original Stikman wrote...
Ranting?
Yes, you summed up the "claims," yet missed the grounds supporting the claim. That is key in argument. The grounds for your specific claim was that a low-dps weapon won't do as well on platinum than a high-dps weapon would.
I don't have to prove that Platinum is NOT about DPS, all i have to do is prove that your grounds don't support your claim to bunk your Claim (which is the product of your argument). If I prove that your grounds are invalid, then you have no claim as it doesn't stand on anything but a stated opinion. (Edit: This is called a "warrant")
A lesson in argument.
Again, your grounds:a low-dps weapon/kit won't do as well on platinum than a high-dps weapon/kit would.
How to debunk your grounds? state: "the same goes for any other difficulty, therefore your claim that "Platinum IS dps is proved to not bear weight soley on platinum."
This is a response to your specific grounds, not necessarily Feneckus' or Sirian's. So using "our" argument, is a bit manipulative and I won't say that my debunking of your grounds debunks theirs.
You're basically just saying,"NO, you need moar dps is everywhere. Yeah, so you're wrong. I win."
A lesson in argument.
no, that isn't what i said. i stated my point in clear language, so you have misconstrued it quite a bit.
The status quo only needs to prove that the claim does not apply to the overall point. I am arguing on the status quo side.
I don't have to prove that the claim is not true, i have to prove that the claim has no grounds. to prove something is not true is the job of those who have the burden of proof.... thats how argument works
not sure why you felt the need to be condescending
Anyways... I don't even remember what you were debating over, but in order to debate you would need to define "skilled" player.
Most of the people here see people who can land consistent headshots and control enemy spawns as a skilled player. Both of these lose value in platinum. Thus, doesn't require more skill than gold.
Also, you can say that high dps is useful on other difficulties, but the fact that it's far more important on platinum is undeniable, so you would have restricted kit choices on platinum unless you want to nerf yourself.
#260
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:40
Complications with quoting? I'm not making any bragusations though.
Modifié par landylan, 25 janvier 2013 - 06:42 .
#261
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:40
#262
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:41
#263
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:51
landylan wrote...
If I sounded condescending, it's because I copied what you said basically...Original Stikman wrote...
landylan wrote...
Instead of proving that something is not true, you are going to "debunk" it? Your debunking statement is false. DPS is not as important on other difficulties. Powers are more effective and accuracy of weapons is actually useful for headshots.Original Stikman wrote...
Ranting?
Yes, you summed up the "claims," yet missed the grounds supporting the claim. That is key in argument. The grounds for your specific claim was that a low-dps weapon won't do as well on platinum than a high-dps weapon would.
I don't have to prove that Platinum is NOT about DPS, all i have to do is prove that your grounds don't support your claim to bunk your Claim (which is the product of your argument). If I prove that your grounds are invalid, then you have no claim as it doesn't stand on anything but a stated opinion. (Edit: This is called a "warrant")
A lesson in argument.
Again, your grounds:a low-dps weapon/kit won't do as well on platinum than a high-dps weapon/kit would.
How to debunk your grounds? state: "the same goes for any other difficulty, therefore your claim that "Platinum IS dps is proved to not bear weight soley on platinum."
This is a response to your specific grounds, not necessarily Feneckus' or Sirian's. So using "our" argument, is a bit manipulative and I won't say that my debunking of your grounds debunks theirs.
You're basically just saying,"NO, you need moar dps is everywhere. Yeah, so you're wrong. I win."
A lesson in argument.
no, that isn't what i said. i stated my point in clear language, so you have misconstrued it quite a bit.
The status quo only needs to prove that the claim does not apply to the overall point. I am arguing on the status quo side.
I don't have to prove that the claim is not true, i have to prove that the claim has no grounds. to prove something is not true is the job of those who have the burden of proof.... thats how argument works
not sure why you felt the need to be condescending
Anyways... I don't even remember what you were debating over, but in order to debate you would need to define "skilled" player.
Most of the people here see people who can land consistent headshots and control enemy spawns as a skilled player. Both of these lose value in platinum. Thus, doesn't require more skill than gold.
Also, you can say that high dps is useful on other difficulties, but the fact that it's far more important on platinum is undeniable, so you would have restricted kit choices on platinum unless you want to nerf yourself.
That would be considered mocking, not just "reflecting." not sure why you felt the need to interject that way.
The definition of skill had little to do with the debate. And yes, for the most part, the last part was agreed upon.
#264
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:52
[*]Totaly agree with you on that.LordBagardo wrote...
A good player is someone who:In my opinion, anyway. Score obviously shows someone has pulled their own weight but getting top doesn't always mean they were the best player there.
- Can do well in combat, such as get headshots often and use cover/powers well
- Revives their team mates when possible
- Helps with objectives the best they can
- Pulls their own wait, but doesn't show off
- Is friendly to strangers and doesn't grief or insult them
- Has good knowledge of builds and weapon mod usage
- Doesn't abuse glitches or bugs in order to win
- Goes on mic and uses it to assist the team, rather than abuse them, play music to them or not say anything and create static for the entire game
- Knows their place - newcomers should not be attempting anything higher than bronze until they max out their starting gear and they learn how to play
#265
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 06:54
And a good player, as someone who maybe couldn't go into higher levels with lesser chars/builds/weaps but would be very comfortable doing so with their more favoured characters and consistently be in the top 2 at least. You see some quite high scores on here (I know from watching videos by Caineghis2500 and others that getting 450k on Plat is no walk in the park and is it even possible to get 300k in Bronze?)
But if you play for fun it shouldn't really bother you unless the ppl at the top were glitching or similar.
Modifié par Carlina, 25 janvier 2013 - 06:57 .
#266
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 07:04
Ive played over 1700 games and seen such players maybe 10 times or so. Im my eyes they are not just good. They are elite,they are our future,they are our sons...wait what?121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
121210Olivia wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
If someone scores 250k in a 4 player game I think it's safe to say that player is a good player.
Agree. The likelihood of this happening regularly, however, is another matter altogether.
Happens regularly when I play. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/angel.png[/smilie]
I see. In all my time playing (2500+ games and counting) I've yet to, even once, witness this.
And im not basing this on score alone. They did help with the objectives,knew exactly what they were doing but generally you only saw them on killfeed during non-objective waves lol.
80€?Necrotya wrote...
ME3 game 50€.......... DLCs 30€........ having fun with friends - priceless. Don't f cking care about the scores, as long as ppl are helping out and having fun.
I bought the key for 21€ and havent spent a cent after that. I mean the MP DLC-s are free and the store doesent force you to buy with bioware points. I often see some low N7 rank people wielding Harrier X-s and such. I always think - no way ill spend real money to get UR-s faster like they have obviously done.
#267
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 09:12
#268
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 09:35
#269
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 10:06
#270
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 10:18
#271
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 10:41
#272
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 10:44
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
_sigge_ wrote...
I'm in a game right now with some extremely high scoring gents. Problem is they are idiots. Why the hell would you run around heatshoting your Wraith when the person trying to de objectives are being run over? - Ok, mission failed at wave 3 since none of the elite wanted to revive anyone. lol@scores
If they let the match wipe on wave 3 they don't sound very elite to me.
#273
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 10:52
_sigge_ wrote...
Ok, mission failed at wave 3 since none of the elite wanted to revive anyone. lol@scores
Does not compute.
#274
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 11:05
Lord_Sirian wrote...
_sigge_ wrote...
I'm in a game right now with some extremely high scoring gents. Problem is they are idiots. Why the hell would you run around heatshoting your Wraith when the person trying to de objectives are being run over? - Ok, mission failed at wave 3 since none of the elite wanted to revive anyone. lol@scores
If they let the match wipe on wave 3 they don't sound very elite to me.
i think _sigge_ was being sarcastic lol
#275
Posté 25 janvier 2013 - 11:20
Who was the better player?





Retour en haut







