. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
So... the COUNCIL fired the first shot in the Krogan Rebellions?
#176
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:19
#177
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:20
. So you don't have any proof?JBPBRC wrote...
Of course I can't, since the game never goes into explicit detail.
--However, that doesn't magically override my previous points. They still stand.
#178
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:20
The Night Mammoth wrote...
xsdob wrote...
How is it that in a thread asking for who fired the first shot on the asari colony, that the fact of which side fired the first shot is regarded as irrelevant, despite it being the entire reason for this threads existence?
I do believe this argument has gained a life of it's own. I can only hope it does not gain self-awareness and enslave us all.
The thread isn't just asking which side fired first, it's a discussion on who started the conflict in general.
Also, just because that's the point of the thread, doesn't mean the initial argument can't still be irrelevant.
Yeah it kinda does, because a thread starts with a premise and builds on it, not disregards the premise in order to have a seperate arguement entierly. Than it just becomes a derailed thread.
Anyway, I'm just kicking back, doing my homework, and eating some fresh musubi's while watching this thread. It's pretty good fun to see.
#179
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:21
Steelcan wrote...
. 1 Krogan female can have 1,000 children in a single clutch of eggs. They'd overcome them in matter of decades.The Night Mammoth wrote...
There are 2 billion asari on Lusia at the time of the Reaper war.
There were probably similar numbers at the time of the Rebellions, so I think the possibility that the Krogan were going to overcome the asari using numbers is extremely unlikely, given that the asari didn't want them there in the first place.
They'd have to land hundreds of millions to have a chance.
Can, and that doesn't mean they all survive.
How are the krogan going to find the resources to support that many, given that the asari are already established on the planet?
Take them from the asari.
How do they do that?
By force.
#180
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:21
Steelcan wrote...
. So you don't have any proof?JBPBRC wrote...
Of course I can't, since the game never goes into explicit detail.
--However, that doesn't magically override my previous points. They still stand.
I've got (slightly) more proof than you. Krogans are an aggressive race taking worlds the Council told them to stop taking. Odds are in my favor that the Krogan were violent before the Council was.
#181
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:22
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
#182
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:23
. You did the same thingThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
#183
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:24
. Probably, but there is zero evidence of direct aggression by the Krogan against the council until after the council attacked Krogan on Lusia.JBPBRC wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. So you don't have any proof?JBPBRC wrote...
Of course I can't, since the game never goes into explicit detail.
--However, that doesn't magically override my previous points. They still stand.
I've got (slightly) more proof than you. Krogans are an aggressive race taking worlds the Council told them to stop taking. Odds are in my favor that the Krogan were violent before the Council was.
#184
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:27
xsdob wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
xsdob wrote...
How is it that in a thread asking for who fired the first shot on the asari colony, that the fact of which side fired the first shot is regarded as irrelevant, despite it being the entire reason for this threads existence?
I do believe this argument has gained a life of it's own. I can only hope it does not gain self-awareness and enslave us all.
The thread isn't just asking which side fired first, it's a discussion on who started the conflict in general.
Also, just because that's the point of the thread, doesn't mean the initial argument can't still be irrelevant.
Yeah it kinda does, because a thread starts with a premise and builds on it, not disregards the premise in order to have a seperate arguement entierly. Than it just becomes a derailed thread.
The OP asked for 'thoughts', pretty general.
That the idea that who fired first doesn't matter is a thought.
Threads don't always have to stick exactly to the original discussion. Forum would be completely boring otherwise.
Anyway, I'm just kicking back, doing my homework, and eating some fresh musubi's while watching this thread. It's pretty good fun to see.
An acceptible use of spam.
#185
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:27
Steelcan wrote...
. Probably, but there is zero evidence of direct aggression by the Krogan against the council until after the council attacked Krogan on Lusia.JBPBRC wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. So you don't have any proof?JBPBRC wrote...
Of course I can't, since the game never goes into explicit detail.
--However, that doesn't magically override my previous points. They still stand.
I've got (slightly) more proof than you. Krogans are an aggressive race taking worlds the Council told them to stop taking. Odds are in my favor that the Krogan were violent before the Council was.
Zero aggression? The Krogan warlord whats-his-face (one of Grunt's greatgreatgranddads) did everything but literally spit in the Council's faces, basically saying that Lusia now belonged to him, irrelevant of the native Asari there, and dared the Council to take it back.
In fact, I'd wager that sounds like a declaration of war.
Modifié par JBPBRC, 24 janvier 2013 - 08:29 .
#186
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:27
#187
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:29
Darth_Trethon wrote...
Oh yeah.....how dare they try to save a colony of innocents from the mindless murdering krogan. I wouldn't have used the genophage.....I would have used a complete 100% sterility virus on the Krogan and then I would have blown up their planet.....just as they destroyed many planets by driving asteroids into them just to see how they'd like it. After that I would have deployed all available council military forces across the galaxy under orders to find and eliminate all remaining Krogan.
Do us a favor. Don't run for any political office, anywhere, ever.
#188
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:29
Steelcan wrote...
. You did the same thingThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
Not really. The idea that the krogan use their rate of reproduction, a long, difficult, and fragile method to gain dominance in an area, as opposed to brute force which they're good at and use all the time, and is far quicker, has no evidence.
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 24 janvier 2013 - 08:30 .
#189
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:29
The Night Mammoth wrote...
xsdob wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
xsdob wrote...
How is it that in a thread asking for who fired the first shot on the asari colony, that the fact of which side fired the first shot is regarded as irrelevant, despite it being the entire reason for this threads existence?
I do believe this argument has gained a life of it's own. I can only hope it does not gain self-awareness and enslave us all.
The thread isn't just asking which side fired first, it's a discussion on who started the conflict in general.
Also, just because that's the point of the thread, doesn't mean the initial argument can't still be irrelevant.
Yeah it kinda does, because a thread starts with a premise and builds on it, not disregards the premise in order to have a seperate arguement entierly. Than it just becomes a derailed thread.
The OP asked for 'thoughts', pretty general.
That the idea that who fired first doesn't matter is a thought.
Threads don't always have to stick exactly to the original discussion. Forum would be completely boring otherwise.Anyway, I'm just kicking back, doing my homework, and eating some fresh musubi's while watching this thread. It's pretty good fun to see.
An acceptible use of spam.
You know it.
#190
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:30
Darth_Trethon wrote...
Oh yeah.....how dare they try to save a colony of innocents from the mindless murdering krogan. I wouldn't have used the genophage.....I would have used a complete 100% sterility virus on the Krogan and then I would have blown up their planet.....just as they destroyed many planets by driving asteroids into them just to see how they'd like it. After that I would have deployed all available council military forces across the galaxy under orders to find and eliminate all remaining Krogan.
Sorry, but your renegade attempt is too primitive for a mind the likes of Javik.
He would've detonated a planet-destroying bomb (and probably more than just one) the DAY the Krogan overstepped their bounds. Primitive.
Modifié par JBPBRC, 24 janvier 2013 - 08:30 .
#191
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:31
. Except common sense. If you can use a world and populate it without having to go to war all th better. War is expensive.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. You did the same thingThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
Not really. The idea that the krogan use their rate of reproduction, a long, difficult, and fragile method to gain dominance in an area, as opposed to brute force, which they're good at, and use all the time, and is quicker, has no evidence.
#192
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:31
Steelcan wrote...
. Except common sense. If you can use a world and populate it without having to go to war all th better. War is expensive.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. You did the same thingThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
Not really. The idea that the krogan use their rate of reproduction, a long, difficult, and fragile method to gain dominance in an area, as opposed to brute force, which they're good at, and use all the time, and is quicker, has no evidence.
Except Krogan always think about war. When they're not frustrated with their inability to make children that is.
#193
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:31
. Please be trolling.Darth_Trethon wrote...
Oh yeah.....how dare they try to save a colony of innocents from the mindless murdering krogan. I wouldn't have used the genophage.....I would have used a complete 100% sterility virus on the Krogan and then I would have blown up their planet.....just as they destroyed many planets by driving asteroids into them just to see how they'd like it. After that I would have deployed all available council military forces across the galaxy under orders to find and eliminate all remaining Krogan.
besides I doubt asteroids would make any impact on Tuchunka.
#194
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:34
. Yes but that was after the attack took place.JBPBRC wrote...
Zero aggression? The Krogan warlord whats-his-face (one of Grunt's greatgreatgranddads) did everything but literally spit in the Council's faces, basically saying that Lusia now belonged to him, irrelevant of the native Asari there, and dared the Council to take it back.
In fact, I'd wager that sounds like a declaration of war.
#195
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:36
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes but that was after the attack took place.JBPBRC wrote...
Zero aggression? The Krogan warlord whats-his-face (one of Grunt's greatgreatgranddads) did everything but literally spit in the Council's faces, basically saying that Lusia now belonged to him, irrelevant of the native Asari there, and dared the Council to take it back.
In fact, I'd wager that sounds like a declaration of war.
No it wasn't. That was right before. It couldn't have happened after the attacks, since the Krogan on Lusia had all surrendered after that point.
Modifié par JBPBRC, 24 janvier 2013 - 08:36 .
#196
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:36
Krogans started the war.
#197
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:37
Steelcan wrote...
. Except common sense. If you can use a world and populate it without having to go to war all th better. War is expensive.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. You did the same thingThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes they do, and you don't either.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The krogan don't reproduce that quickly, and you have literally no evidence for that.
Just spent a whole thread showing it to you, but ignore that.
Not really. The idea that the krogan use their rate of reproduction, a long, difficult, and fragile method to gain dominance in an area, as opposed to brute force, which they're good at, and use all the time, and is quicker, has no evidence.
We're talking about the krogan here, they like war, they thrive on conflict, they don't have the organization or the foresight to care about the cost.
I think the krogan are far more likely to choose the quick, fun, and direct method of getting what they want, as opposed to the slow, boring, and complicated one.
#198
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:37
. He can't dare the council to take the world back before populating it. Or am I missing something?JBPBRC wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
. Yes but that was after the attack took place.JBPBRC wrote...
Zero aggression? The Krogan warlord whats-his-face (one of Grunt's greatgreatgranddads) did everything but literally spit in the Council's faces, basically saying that Lusia now belonged to him, irrelevant of the native Asari there, and dared the Council to take it back.
In fact, I'd wager that sounds like a declaration of war.
No it wasn't. That was right before. It couldn't have happened after the attacks, since the Krogan had all surrendered after that point.
#199
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:38
. If that's the case why didnt they immediately attack the council after the Rachni wars?The Night Mammoth wrote...
We're talking about the krogan here, they like war, they thrive on conflict, they don't have the organization or the foresight to care about the cost.
I think the krogan are far more likely to choose the quick, fun, and direct method of getting what they want, as opposed to the slow, boring, and complicated one.
#200
Posté 24 janvier 2013 - 08:39
. You must have missed the examples of non-violent annexations. The Krogan established the groundwork for the war, but the council fired first.Dark_Caduceus wrote...
Annex: to take or appropriate, especially without permission.
Krogans started the war.





Retour en haut







