Lord_Sirian wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Can someone give me a synopsis of anything interesting in this thread past the first page? I don't really feel like reading through 12 pages of Gallows complaining about RCing. Thanks.
GP acts like a moron
L_S calls him out on it in trademark acerbic fashion
Everyone else joins in
GP finally backpedals far enough that his post makes some kind of sense, and also says "lol i trol u guise from da start,trolololoolo"
I don't enjoy seeing the mentally handicapped get pummeled.darkpassenger2342 wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Can someone give me a synopsis of anything interesting in this thread past the first page? I don't really feel like reading through 12 pages of Gallows complaining about RCing. Thanks.
oh, but its so worth a read.
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
Gpole juggles many arguments at
once hoping people will forget all the dumb stuff he says by diluting
it with more dumb stuff.
Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 30 janvier 2013 - 01:59 .
megabeast37215 wrote...
GallowsPole wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
Gallows: Have you been up drinking all night? You sound like someone whose been on a binge.
Nope, When you ordered me to stop being lame and to stahp. I did. I woke up to see new posts!
....and you just couldn't resist could you?
You are aware that none of this is a big deal right?
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
ah yes, the cliche "it was all a joke" ending, followed by "im on drugs so im not responsible for my opinions"
i mentioned that earlier, with this:
GallowsPole wrote...
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
ah yes, the cliche "it was all a joke" ending, followed by "im on drugs so im not responsible for my opinions"
i mentioned that earlier, with this:
That hurts guys. It really hurts.
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
Dont forget you called us all steroid using baseball players not eligible for the hall of fame...
that hurts more.
Ok.GallowsPole wrote...
Now youre catching on.
I have no idea when animation canceling came to be or for what reasons.Animation cancelling developed because of PvP and one in which I would be ok with from a mechanic perspective. This way everyone is equal and the loser will fall to the quicker reloader. This is acceptable.
Rather than trying to argue whether it is a poor gameplay design or not, I think animation canceling is worth having, utility-wise, even in PvE. I probably wouldn't use the Claymore or the Widow without it. I'd rather not watch the long animation every single time, and I'm just glad there is a way out of it.In PvE, like this game, it does nothing to reward anything except score or effectiveness if you want to call it that. This is just a motivator, IMO, of poor gameplay and e-peen crap which I don't particularly care for and why I don't play PvP games anymore. There really isn't any valid reason to have it in this type of gameplay. IMO of course.
megabeast37215 wrote...
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
Dont forget you called us all steroid using baseball players not eligible for the hall of fame...
that hurts more.
You're a Red Sox fan... your team is a bunch of drunks
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
Dont forget you called us all steroid using baseball players not eligible for the hall of fame...
that hurts more.
You're a Red Sox fan... your team is a bunch of drunks
fried chicken + beer = missing the playoffs and firing your manager to hire bobby valentine.
GallowsPole wrote...
Since someone finally pointed out the Derek Hollan link, you guys may continue.
)
Modifié par Charaxan, 30 janvier 2013 - 02:42 .
Charaxan wrote...
You can call that "disabeled-solidarity", but my opinion is near the one of GP, except maybe the insults and trolls. (Yes, he said other things too
I think about RC : it should be removed (easy : include the thermoclips at the end of the animation) AND the animation time reduced. Why ? My opinion is : there is no need of a reloading time if it can be tricked. A great weapon have often great setbacks, and realoading time is one of those in the balance. (with weight, thermoclips capacity, etc).
OR, if you really want to keep the RC, all weapons should be standardized : the fast reload (like avenger, Harrier, and such) and the slow reload (Black widdow and such). Maybe a "very fast" if you want (for some smg) but that's all. No nuance. No more "Harrier is slower than avenger because Harrier is better". All the same, balance found elswere, and no more problem abour RC.
BUT, RC should never give advantage of great weapon against a bad. The great weapon is great, it doesn't need more than a bad weapon.
Sorry, that's not a joke but I am under drugs, does that count ?
Blitzkrieg_33 wrote...
You may have your own opinion, no one will fault you for that. But it doesn't change the fact that the Game Developers disagree with you. And considering that they are the ones making the product I'm using, I will stick to caring about their opinion, and not so much about yours.
We're cool though, we're cool.
Charaxan wrote...
No we are not ! You don't like disabeled persons, do you ?
Seriously, a lot of modifications of gameplay has been made because BSN asked for it or advanced serious arguments.
Plus, they often gave an "official" statement and then changed it so it could be more consistant with their new changes.
As I respect their opinion, official statements and all that, I can't but deplore the lack of logic behind the concept of RC AND balances, as those two opposes themselves for now.
And, as I said, my opinion is one think, but I thought about other possibilities, against my opinion but that I find adaptables to compensate the disbalance.
), the more enjoyable you're experience will be.
Blitzkrieg_33 wrote...
Some things BSN asks for end up biting them in the ass.
Respec cards, for example.
RC has been, and always will be, a part of the ME3 MP experience. The sooner you learn to deal with it (
Aight? we cool, we cool.
BlackDahlia424 wrote...
GallowsPole wrote...
Distilled Poison wrote...
@GallowsPole- Feel free to make a thread crying about it.
You guys save me time by opening threads about it. Besides, I don't cry. If cheating, excuse me, exploiting the defects of the game strokes your e-peen, that's cool.
I look at you guys like the baseball steroid users who didn't make it into the Hall of Fame with big asterisks next to their stats. They bent the rules too.I should be allowed to post my opposing opinion along with these threads. It's America. As long as The Constitution isn't burned, it's my right.
Your opinion doesn't hold water when the devs explicted stated it's a game mechanic. So you can have your opinion, but you're just wrong.
Beerfish wrote...
BlackDahlia424 wrote...
GallowsPole wrote...
Distilled Poison wrote...
@GallowsPole- Feel free to make a thread crying about it.
You guys save me time by opening threads about it. Besides, I don't cry. If cheating, excuse me, exploiting the defects of the game strokes your e-peen, that's cool.
I look at you guys like the baseball steroid users who didn't make it into the Hall of Fame with big asterisks next to their stats. They bent the rules too.
Your opinion doesn't hold water when the devs explicted stated it's a game mechanic. So you can have your opinion, but you're just wrong.
One has to ask why is it a game mechanic, probably becasue the problem would be too tough to fix. If they do not want relaods then speed up the animations or remove them. I think the old it's a game mechanic is a cop out statement.
Feneckus wrote...
That's one of the many reasons i like the Claymore.
You can hide the reload wih pretty much every single power in the game.
And that's why the Wraith is massively overrated.
Modifié par Dream-Maker, 30 janvier 2013 - 03:41 .
Logic in a game with space ninjas?Charaxan wrote...
Blitzkrieg_33 wrote...
You may have your own opinion, no one will fault you for that. But it doesn't change the fact that the Game Developers disagree with you. And considering that they are the ones making the product I'm using, I will stick to caring about their opinion, and not so much about yours.
We're cool though, we're cool.
No we are not ! You don't like disabeled persons, do you ?
Seriously, a lot of modifications of gameplay has been made because BSN asked for it or advanced serious arguments.
Plus, they often gave an "official" statement and then changed it so it could be more consistant with their new changes.
As I respect their opinion, official statements and all that, I can't but deplore the lack of logic behind the concept of RC AND balances, as those two opposes themselves for now.
And, as I said, my opinion is one think, but I thought about other possibilities, against my opinion but that I find adaptables to compensate the disbalance.
Retour en haut
